Utilisation of the National Student Financial Aid Scheme's Learning Material Allowance for Higher Education Students: A Perspective of a South African University

IF 2.8 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Mfundo Mandla Masuku, Victor H. Mlambo, Nduduzo C. Ndebele
{"title":"Utilisation of the National Student Financial Aid Scheme's Learning Material Allowance for Higher Education Students: A Perspective of a South African University","authors":"Mfundo Mandla Masuku,&nbsp;Victor H. Mlambo,&nbsp;Nduduzo C. Ndebele","doi":"10.1111/hequ.70042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Public higher education institutions in developing countries have faced a steady increase in student enrolment, driven by historical factors such as the expansion of access to education following the end of apartheid in South Africa and other policies aimed at addressing socio-economic inequalities. This increase, however, has led to challenges in adequately meeting the growing demand for resources and services, often resulting in institutions operating at or beyond their ideal capacity. Coupled with a reduction in state funding, these conditions have uncertained the future of higher education financing. This study examines how university students in South Africa use the book allowance provided by the National Student Financial Aid Scheme (NSFAS). The study employed a survey strategy to collect data from 358 randomly selected university students using a structured questionnaire. The findings revealed that only 19.3% of students used their book allowance to purchase academic textbooks. The study highlighted that external financial pressures, such as family obligations and living expenses, led to the diversion of funds away from textbooks. Additionally, many students opted to purchase information and communication technology (ICT) devices, reflecting a shift from traditional print media to digital learning materials. All demographic groups, including gender, age and academic faculty, observed this trend. However, the study found that students from lower socio-economic backgrounds were more likely to reallocate their allowances due to greater financial pressures. On the basis of these findings, the study recommends implementing more differentiated funding mechanisms that account for varying poverty levels among students, increasing support for affordable online academic resources, providing targeted financial literacy programmes and improving accountability in using financial aid.</p>","PeriodicalId":51607,"journal":{"name":"HIGHER EDUCATION QUARTERLY","volume":"79 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hequ.70042","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HIGHER EDUCATION QUARTERLY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hequ.70042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Public higher education institutions in developing countries have faced a steady increase in student enrolment, driven by historical factors such as the expansion of access to education following the end of apartheid in South Africa and other policies aimed at addressing socio-economic inequalities. This increase, however, has led to challenges in adequately meeting the growing demand for resources and services, often resulting in institutions operating at or beyond their ideal capacity. Coupled with a reduction in state funding, these conditions have uncertained the future of higher education financing. This study examines how university students in South Africa use the book allowance provided by the National Student Financial Aid Scheme (NSFAS). The study employed a survey strategy to collect data from 358 randomly selected university students using a structured questionnaire. The findings revealed that only 19.3% of students used their book allowance to purchase academic textbooks. The study highlighted that external financial pressures, such as family obligations and living expenses, led to the diversion of funds away from textbooks. Additionally, many students opted to purchase information and communication technology (ICT) devices, reflecting a shift from traditional print media to digital learning materials. All demographic groups, including gender, age and academic faculty, observed this trend. However, the study found that students from lower socio-economic backgrounds were more likely to reallocate their allowances due to greater financial pressures. On the basis of these findings, the study recommends implementing more differentiated funding mechanisms that account for varying poverty levels among students, increasing support for affordable online academic resources, providing targeted financial literacy programmes and improving accountability in using financial aid.

Abstract Image

高等教育学生国家学生经济援助计划学习材料津贴的利用:一所南非大学的视角
发展中国家的公立高等教育机构的学生入学人数稳步增加,这是由于历史因素的推动,例如南非种族隔离结束后受教育机会的扩大以及旨在解决社会经济不平等问题的其他政策。然而,这种增加在充分满足对资源和服务日益增长的需求方面带来了挑战,往往导致各机构的运作达到或超出其理想能力。再加上国家资助的减少,这些情况使高等教育融资的未来变得不确定。本研究考察了南非大学生如何使用国家学生财政援助计划(NSFAS)提供的图书津贴。本研究采用调查策略,随机选取358名大学生,采用结构化问卷收集数据。调查结果显示,只有19.3%的学生使用图书津贴购买学术教科书。该研究强调,外部财政压力,如家庭义务和生活费用,导致资金从教科书转移。此外,许多学生选择购买信息和通信技术(ICT)设备,反映了从传统印刷媒体到数字学习材料的转变。所有人口群体,包括性别、年龄和学术人员,都观察到这一趋势。然而,研究发现,由于经济压力更大,社会经济背景较低的学生更有可能重新分配他们的零花钱。在这些发现的基础上,该研究建议实施更加差异化的资助机制,考虑到学生的不同贫困水平,增加对可负担的在线学术资源的支持,提供有针对性的金融扫盲计划,并改善使用财政援助的问责制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
HIGHER EDUCATION QUARTERLY
HIGHER EDUCATION QUARTERLY EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
9.10%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: Higher Education Quarterly publishes articles concerned with policy, strategic management and ideas in higher education. A substantial part of its contents is concerned with reporting research findings in ways that bring out their relevance to senior managers and policy makers at institutional and national levels, and to academics who are not necessarily specialists in the academic study of higher education. Higher Education Quarterly also publishes papers that are not based on empirical research but give thoughtful academic analyses of significant policy, management or academic issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信