Exploring Bacterial Endophytes as Potential Biocontrol Agents Against Aspergillus parasiticus Colonisation and Aflatoxin Contamination in Maize

IF 1.1 4区 农林科学 Q3 PLANT SCIENCES
Ganapathy Sivakaame, Theerthagiri Anand, Vaikuntavasan Paranidharan, Govindasamy Senthilraja, Chinnapaiyan Vanitha
{"title":"Exploring Bacterial Endophytes as Potential Biocontrol Agents Against Aspergillus parasiticus Colonisation and Aflatoxin Contamination in Maize","authors":"Ganapathy Sivakaame,&nbsp;Theerthagiri Anand,&nbsp;Vaikuntavasan Paranidharan,&nbsp;Govindasamy Senthilraja,&nbsp;Chinnapaiyan Vanitha","doi":"10.1111/jph.70119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Aflatoxin is one of the most deleterious types of mycotoxins commonly found in maize. Using native endophytic bacteria to control phytopathogens can be a successful strategy for managing plant diseases. A total of 26 endophytic bacterial strains were isolated from different parts of maize plants and their efficacy tested against the mycelial growth of highly toxigenic <i>Aspergillus parasiticus</i> Asp23. Among the endophytic isolates, EPL2 and EPL3 showed the highest inhibition (51.1% inhibition over control after 7 days of co-culture) followed by EPR2, EPR4 and EPC1. All effective bacterial isolates were tentatively identified by 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis and homology analysis with the NCBI nucleotide database using BLAST search. A detoxification assay indicated that endophytic bacterial isolates EPR2, EPL2 and EPL3 were superior in detoxifying both aflatoxin B1 and B2. Furthermore, we demonstrated the antifungal mechanisms of endophytic bacteria, such as the production of extracellular lytic enzymes, antifungal volatiles and siderophores. Finally, the effect of endophytic bacterial isolates EPL3, EPR2 and EPC2 was tested against <i>A. parasiticus</i> and aflatoxin contamination in maize grains in vivo. The results revealed that there was a significant reduction in colonisation of <i>A. parasiticus</i> and the lowest population was recorded in EPL3-treated maize grains, followed by EPR2. Similarly, the endophyte EPL3 showed the highest reduction in aflatoxin levels of 94.8% (to 23.05 ppb), followed by EPR2 (94.4% reduction to 24.71 ppb), whereas in the untreated control the aflatoxin level was 445.37 ppb. This study demonstrated that endophytic bacteria isolated from maize could be a successful biocontrol source to suppress <i>Aspergillus</i> growth and reduce aflatoxin contamination in maize grains.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16843,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Phytopathology","volume":"173 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Phytopathology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jph.70119","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aflatoxin is one of the most deleterious types of mycotoxins commonly found in maize. Using native endophytic bacteria to control phytopathogens can be a successful strategy for managing plant diseases. A total of 26 endophytic bacterial strains were isolated from different parts of maize plants and their efficacy tested against the mycelial growth of highly toxigenic Aspergillus parasiticus Asp23. Among the endophytic isolates, EPL2 and EPL3 showed the highest inhibition (51.1% inhibition over control after 7 days of co-culture) followed by EPR2, EPR4 and EPC1. All effective bacterial isolates were tentatively identified by 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis and homology analysis with the NCBI nucleotide database using BLAST search. A detoxification assay indicated that endophytic bacterial isolates EPR2, EPL2 and EPL3 were superior in detoxifying both aflatoxin B1 and B2. Furthermore, we demonstrated the antifungal mechanisms of endophytic bacteria, such as the production of extracellular lytic enzymes, antifungal volatiles and siderophores. Finally, the effect of endophytic bacterial isolates EPL3, EPR2 and EPC2 was tested against A. parasiticus and aflatoxin contamination in maize grains in vivo. The results revealed that there was a significant reduction in colonisation of A. parasiticus and the lowest population was recorded in EPL3-treated maize grains, followed by EPR2. Similarly, the endophyte EPL3 showed the highest reduction in aflatoxin levels of 94.8% (to 23.05 ppb), followed by EPR2 (94.4% reduction to 24.71 ppb), whereas in the untreated control the aflatoxin level was 445.37 ppb. This study demonstrated that endophytic bacteria isolated from maize could be a successful biocontrol source to suppress Aspergillus growth and reduce aflatoxin contamination in maize grains.

细菌内生菌作为玉米曲霉寄生定殖和黄曲霉毒素污染潜在生物防治剂的探索
黄曲霉毒素是玉米中常见的最有害的真菌毒素之一。利用原生内生细菌控制植物病原菌是控制植物病害的一种成功策略。从玉米植株不同部位分离到26株内生细菌,并对其对高毒曲霉寄生Asp23菌丝生长的抑制作用进行了试验。在内生菌株中,EPL2和EPL3的抑制率最高(共培养7 d后比对照抑制率为51.1%),其次是EPR2、EPR4和EPC1。所有有效菌株采用BLAST检索,通过16S rRNA基因序列分析和NCBI核苷酸数据库同源性分析初步鉴定。解毒实验表明,内生菌株EPR2、EPL2和EPL3对黄曲霉毒素B1和B2的解毒能力均较强。此外,我们还证明了内生细菌的抗真菌机制,如细胞外裂解酶、抗真菌挥发物和铁载体的产生。最后,对内生细菌分离株EPL3、EPR2和EPC2在体内对玉米籽粒中的寄生和黄曲霉毒素污染进行了检测。结果表明,经epl3处理的玉米籽粒中,寄生蜂的定殖量显著减少,最低,EPR2次之。同样,内生菌EPL3显示黄曲霉毒素水平降低最高,为94.8%(至23.05 ppb),其次是EPR2(降低94.4%,至24.71 ppb),而未经处理的对照黄曲霉毒素水平为445.37 ppb。本研究表明,从玉米中分离的内生细菌可以作为一种成功的生物防治源,抑制玉米籽粒中曲霉的生长,减少黄曲霉毒素污染。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Phytopathology
Journal of Phytopathology 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
88
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Phytopathology publishes original and review articles on all scientific aspects of applied phytopathology in agricultural and horticultural crops. Preference is given to contributions improving our understanding of the biotic and abiotic determinants of plant diseases, including epidemics and damage potential, as a basis for innovative disease management, modelling and forecasting. This includes practical aspects and the development of methods for disease diagnosis as well as infection bioassays. Studies at the population, organism, physiological, biochemical and molecular genetic level are welcome. The journal scope comprises the pathology and epidemiology of plant diseases caused by microbial pathogens, viruses and nematodes. Accepted papers should advance our conceptual knowledge of plant diseases, rather than presenting descriptive or screening data unrelated to phytopathological mechanisms or functions. Results from unrepeated experimental conditions or data with no or inappropriate statistical processing will not be considered. Authors are encouraged to look at past issues to ensure adherence to the standards of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信