Inside the Black Box: Tracing Interactions Between Stratified Reintegration Trajectories and Street-Level Implementation of Reintegration Assistance

IF 2.1 3区 社会学 Q2 DEMOGRAPHY
Ruth Vollmer, Clara Schmitz-Pranghe
{"title":"Inside the Black Box: Tracing Interactions Between Stratified Reintegration Trajectories and Street-Level Implementation of Reintegration Assistance","authors":"Ruth Vollmer,&nbsp;Clara Schmitz-Pranghe","doi":"10.1111/imig.70061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article analyses the interactions between inequalities and reintegration assistance, looking at the examples of Serbia and Kosovo. It proposes an approach for examining the reintegration assistance practices of frontline providers by (a) viewing them through the lens of street-level bureaucracy acting mainly on behalf of the returning state and (b) as locally situated agents within the networks of their own distributive relations and embodying their own social positioning. Street-level implementers play an active role in shaping outreach, effectiveness, and sustainability of reintegration assistance, not always in the intended ways. This article traces their navigation of institutional, organisational, and relational contexts, internalised social norms, and perceptions of social divisions, as well as the micro-dynamics of asymmetrical interactions during service delivery. It finds that strategies applied by street-level assistance providers have ambivalent but rather minor effects on pre-existing inequalities. Even though they often naturalise prevalent social divisions, the interactions and allocation of assistance are determined more by their practical experiences, availability and type of support, as well as general programme design and working conditions. The inability to bridge the mismatch between available support and needs can even endorse inequality-normalising perceptions.</p>","PeriodicalId":48011,"journal":{"name":"International Migration","volume":"63 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/imig.70061","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Migration","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/imig.70061","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article analyses the interactions between inequalities and reintegration assistance, looking at the examples of Serbia and Kosovo. It proposes an approach for examining the reintegration assistance practices of frontline providers by (a) viewing them through the lens of street-level bureaucracy acting mainly on behalf of the returning state and (b) as locally situated agents within the networks of their own distributive relations and embodying their own social positioning. Street-level implementers play an active role in shaping outreach, effectiveness, and sustainability of reintegration assistance, not always in the intended ways. This article traces their navigation of institutional, organisational, and relational contexts, internalised social norms, and perceptions of social divisions, as well as the micro-dynamics of asymmetrical interactions during service delivery. It finds that strategies applied by street-level assistance providers have ambivalent but rather minor effects on pre-existing inequalities. Even though they often naturalise prevalent social divisions, the interactions and allocation of assistance are determined more by their practical experiences, availability and type of support, as well as general programme design and working conditions. The inability to bridge the mismatch between available support and needs can even endorse inequality-normalising perceptions.

黑箱内部:追踪分层重返社会轨迹与街道层面实施重返社会援助之间的相互作用
本文以塞尔维亚和科索沃为例,分析了不平等与重返社会援助之间的相互作用。它提出了一种方法,通过(a)通过主要代表回归国家的街头官僚机构的视角来审视前线提供者的重返社会援助实践,以及(b)在他们自己的分配关系网络中作为当地的代理人,体现他们自己的社会定位。街道一级的执行者在塑造重返社会援助的外联、有效性和可持续性方面发挥积极作用,但并不总是按照预期的方式。本文追溯了他们在制度、组织和关系背景、内化的社会规范、对社会分化的看法以及服务提供过程中不对称互动的微观动力学方面的导航。它发现,街头援助提供者所采用的策略对先前存在的不平等产生了矛盾但相当小的影响。尽管它们往往使普遍存在的社会分歧归化,但相互作用和援助的分配更多地取决于它们的实际经验、可获得性和支助类型,以及总体方案设计和工作条件。无法弥合现有支持和需求之间的不匹配,甚至可能支持不平等正常化的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
10.50%
发文量
130
期刊介绍: International Migration is a refereed, policy oriented journal on migration issues as analysed by demographers, economists, sociologists, political scientists and other social scientists from all parts of the world. It covers the entire field of policy relevance in international migration, giving attention not only to a breadth of topics reflective of policy concerns, but also attention to coverage of all regions of the world and to comparative policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信