Eric Njuki, Michée A. Lachaud, Boris E. Bravo-Ureta, Nigel Key
{"title":"Ethnic and gender disparities in U.S. agriculture: An analysis of technology and technical efficiency differentials","authors":"Eric Njuki, Michée A. Lachaud, Boris E. Bravo-Ureta, Nigel Key","doi":"10.1111/ajae.12539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We explore ethnic and gender disparities in U.S. agriculture by comparing productivity gaps between male- and female-headed family farms, and between non-Hispanic White and minority-headed family farms. Using Agricultural Resource Management Survey data from 2017 to 2020, propensity score matching techniques are applied to obtain comparable samples based on observable covariates. Statistical tests reveal structural differences in production technologies between male- and female-headed farms, and between non-Hispanic White and minority-headed farms, thus requiring the estimation of separate production technologies for each group. Accordingly, a stochastic metafrontier framework is used to envelop the group frontiers and assess technology gaps. The results indicate that female and minority-principal operators not only use different production technologies but are also less proficient at combining inputs to maximize farm output. The results also reveal within-group gender and ethnic differences—ceteris paribus, among non-Hispanic White and minority-led farms, female producers generated substantially less output compared to their male counterparts. Similarly, among male principal operators, Hispanic producers generated more output compared to their non-Hispanic White and non-Hispanic non-White counterparts.</p>","PeriodicalId":55537,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","volume":"107 4","pages":"993-1015"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajae.12539","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We explore ethnic and gender disparities in U.S. agriculture by comparing productivity gaps between male- and female-headed family farms, and between non-Hispanic White and minority-headed family farms. Using Agricultural Resource Management Survey data from 2017 to 2020, propensity score matching techniques are applied to obtain comparable samples based on observable covariates. Statistical tests reveal structural differences in production technologies between male- and female-headed farms, and between non-Hispanic White and minority-headed farms, thus requiring the estimation of separate production technologies for each group. Accordingly, a stochastic metafrontier framework is used to envelop the group frontiers and assess technology gaps. The results indicate that female and minority-principal operators not only use different production technologies but are also less proficient at combining inputs to maximize farm output. The results also reveal within-group gender and ethnic differences—ceteris paribus, among non-Hispanic White and minority-led farms, female producers generated substantially less output compared to their male counterparts. Similarly, among male principal operators, Hispanic producers generated more output compared to their non-Hispanic White and non-Hispanic non-White counterparts.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Agricultural Economics provides a forum for creative and scholarly work on the economics of agriculture and food, natural resources and the environment, and rural and community development throughout the world. Papers should relate to one of these areas, should have a problem orientation, and should demonstrate originality and innovation in analysis, methods, or application. Analyses of problems pertinent to research, extension, and teaching are equally encouraged, as is interdisciplinary research with a significant economic component. Review articles that offer a comprehensive and insightful survey of a relevant subject, consistent with the scope of the Journal as discussed above, will also be considered. All articles published, regardless of their nature, will be held to the same set of scholarly standards.