Dementia Education and Training for the Multidisciplinary Student Healthcare Workforce: A Systematic Review

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Malvika Muralidhar, Saskia Delray, Claudia Cooper, Sedigheh Zabihi, Sube Banerjee, Clarissa Giebel, Karen Harrison Dening, Yvonne Birks, Charlotte Kenten, Madeleine Walpert
{"title":"Dementia Education and Training for the Multidisciplinary Student Healthcare Workforce: A Systematic Review","authors":"Malvika Muralidhar,&nbsp;Saskia Delray,&nbsp;Claudia Cooper,&nbsp;Sedigheh Zabihi,&nbsp;Sube Banerjee,&nbsp;Clarissa Giebel,&nbsp;Karen Harrison Dening,&nbsp;Yvonne Birks,&nbsp;Charlotte Kenten,&nbsp;Madeleine Walpert","doi":"10.1002/gps.70119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To systematically review research evidence on the effectiveness of dementia education and training for health and social care students.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We searched electronic databases for primary research studies (published between 2015 and 2024), evaluating dementia training for health and social care students. We assessed risk of bias using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool, prioritising studies scoring 4+ (higher quality) that reported significant findings on primary outcomes from controlled intervention trials. We reported outcomes using Kirkpatrick's framework. We consulted professional stakeholders in a focus group regarding how findings might inform practice.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>17/35 included studies were rated 4+ on the MMAT; only one met our criteria for priority evidence. An experiential programme for medical students, ‘Time for Dementia’, which combined skill-learning and reflective sessions with visits to people with dementia, was found to improve Kirkpatrick Level 2 (learning) outcomes, attitudes and knowledge over 2 years of participation; this was supported from findings from qualitative studies. Asynchronous, self-directed learning did not improve learning outcomes, relative to standard training. Though almost all training programmes incorporated lived experience, no patient reported outcomes were used to evaluate the impact of training. Nine focus group attendees agreed that the evidence reflected their experiences that consistent support, combined with skills-based and reflective sessions, optimised student learning from initial patient-focused encounters.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Effective interventions increased confidence and enjoyment of dementia care encounters, and increased interest in careers in dementia specialities. Mandating evidence-based dementia skills programmes across specialities could ensure that students learn the skills and competencies required to be part of an effective future workforce and drive important improvements in care quality. Evidence based approaches to enhancing dementia education in training could include experiential learning modules in early years of medical school training and allied health and care professional training, using evidence-based approaches to teach communication skills and other essential dementia care skills within clinical placements, and providing dedicated supervision to support their implementation. Future research could usefully consider patient perspectives in determining the impact of educational programmes.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14060,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry","volume":"40 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/gps.70119","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/gps.70119","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To systematically review research evidence on the effectiveness of dementia education and training for health and social care students.

Methods

We searched electronic databases for primary research studies (published between 2015 and 2024), evaluating dementia training for health and social care students. We assessed risk of bias using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool, prioritising studies scoring 4+ (higher quality) that reported significant findings on primary outcomes from controlled intervention trials. We reported outcomes using Kirkpatrick's framework. We consulted professional stakeholders in a focus group regarding how findings might inform practice.

Results

17/35 included studies were rated 4+ on the MMAT; only one met our criteria for priority evidence. An experiential programme for medical students, ‘Time for Dementia’, which combined skill-learning and reflective sessions with visits to people with dementia, was found to improve Kirkpatrick Level 2 (learning) outcomes, attitudes and knowledge over 2 years of participation; this was supported from findings from qualitative studies. Asynchronous, self-directed learning did not improve learning outcomes, relative to standard training. Though almost all training programmes incorporated lived experience, no patient reported outcomes were used to evaluate the impact of training. Nine focus group attendees agreed that the evidence reflected their experiences that consistent support, combined with skills-based and reflective sessions, optimised student learning from initial patient-focused encounters.

Conclusions

Effective interventions increased confidence and enjoyment of dementia care encounters, and increased interest in careers in dementia specialities. Mandating evidence-based dementia skills programmes across specialities could ensure that students learn the skills and competencies required to be part of an effective future workforce and drive important improvements in care quality. Evidence based approaches to enhancing dementia education in training could include experiential learning modules in early years of medical school training and allied health and care professional training, using evidence-based approaches to teach communication skills and other essential dementia care skills within clinical placements, and providing dedicated supervision to support their implementation. Future research could usefully consider patient perspectives in determining the impact of educational programmes.

Abstract Image

痴呆教育和培训的多学科学生医疗保健工作人员:一个系统的回顾
目的系统回顾对健康与社会关怀学生进行痴呆教育与培训有效性的研究证据。方法:我们检索了电子数据库中发表于2015年至2024年间的主要研究,评估了对健康和社会护理学生的痴呆症培训。我们使用混合方法评估工具评估偏倚风险,优先考虑评分为4+(质量较高)的研究,这些研究报告了对照干预试验中主要结果的显著发现。我们使用Kirkpatrick的框架报告结果。我们在一个焦点小组中咨询了专业利益相关者,了解调查结果如何为实践提供信息。结果纳入的研究中有17/35在MMAT上被评为4+;只有一个符合我们优先证据的标准。一项针对医科学生的体验方案“治疗痴呆症的时间”,将技能学习和反思会议与探访痴呆症患者结合起来,发现在两年的参与中改善了柯克帕特里克2级(学习)成果、态度和知识;这得到了定性研究结果的支持。与标准训练相比,异步、自主学习并没有提高学习效果。尽管几乎所有的培训项目都纳入了生活经验,但没有患者报告的结果被用来评估培训的影响。9位焦点小组的与会者一致认为,证据反映了他们的经验,即持续的支持,结合基于技能和反思的会议,优化了学生从最初以患者为中心的接触中学习的过程。结论:有效的干预措施增加了痴呆症护理接触的信心和乐趣,并增加了对痴呆症专业职业的兴趣。在各专业强制实施以证据为基础的痴呆症技能课程,可以确保学生学习成为未来有效劳动力所需的技能和能力,并推动护理质量的重大改进。在培训中加强痴呆症教育的循证方法可包括在医学院培训的早期阶段和联合保健和护理专业培训中采用体验式学习模块,在临床实习中使用循证方法教授沟通技巧和其他必要的痴呆症护理技能,并提供专门的监督以支持其实施。未来的研究在确定教育方案的影响时可以有效地考虑病人的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.50%
发文量
168
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The rapidly increasing world population of aged people has led to a growing need to focus attention on the problems of mental disorder in late life. The aim of the Journal is to communicate the results of original research in the causes, treatment and care of all forms of mental disorder which affect the elderly. The Journal is of interest to psychiatrists, psychologists, social scientists, nurses and others engaged in therapeutic professions, together with general neurobiological researchers. The Journal provides an international perspective on the important issue of geriatric psychiatry, and contributions are published from countries throughout the world. Topics covered include epidemiology of mental disorders in old age, clinical aetiological research, post-mortem pathological and neurochemical studies, treatment trials and evaluation of geriatric psychiatry services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信