Impact of inputs, information, and financial services on the adoption of a biofortified crop by women farmers in Uganda

IF 4.2 2区 经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY
Niklas Buehren, Shyamal Chowdhury, Sreelakshmi Papineni, Munshi Sulaiman
{"title":"Impact of inputs, information, and financial services on the adoption of a biofortified crop by women farmers in Uganda","authors":"Niklas Buehren,&nbsp;Shyamal Chowdhury,&nbsp;Sreelakshmi Papineni,&nbsp;Munshi Sulaiman","doi":"10.1111/ajae.12540","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Smallholder farmers in low- and middle-income countries face several constraints to technology adoption. We test the relative efficacy of interventions designed to incentivize the production and consumption of a biofortified orange-fleshed sweet potato crop by female farmers in Uganda. Through a clustered randomized controlled trial involving more than 8000 female farmers across 210 communities, we track the impact of the interventions on adoption, consumption, and health outcomes, both in the short term and long term. Our findings suggest that the provision of inputs and agricultural extension is an effective approach to adoption, leading over 60% of households to cultivate and 50% to consume the crop. Nutrition training emphasizing the crop's health benefits has limited impact on cultivation, but it leads 20% of households to consume the biofortified crop. Combining the two approaches with supplementary credit and insurance products has limited marginal effects on adoption. We also observe improvements in dietary diversity resulting from the tested interventions, along with spillover effects through social networks in neighboring communities. We find little evidence of treatment effects on higher-order outcomes such as visual acuity, child health and nutrition, or income.</p>","PeriodicalId":55537,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","volume":"107 4","pages":"1117-1151"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajae.12540","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Smallholder farmers in low- and middle-income countries face several constraints to technology adoption. We test the relative efficacy of interventions designed to incentivize the production and consumption of a biofortified orange-fleshed sweet potato crop by female farmers in Uganda. Through a clustered randomized controlled trial involving more than 8000 female farmers across 210 communities, we track the impact of the interventions on adoption, consumption, and health outcomes, both in the short term and long term. Our findings suggest that the provision of inputs and agricultural extension is an effective approach to adoption, leading over 60% of households to cultivate and 50% to consume the crop. Nutrition training emphasizing the crop's health benefits has limited impact on cultivation, but it leads 20% of households to consume the biofortified crop. Combining the two approaches with supplementary credit and insurance products has limited marginal effects on adoption. We also observe improvements in dietary diversity resulting from the tested interventions, along with spillover effects through social networks in neighboring communities. We find little evidence of treatment effects on higher-order outcomes such as visual acuity, child health and nutrition, or income.

投入物、信息和金融服务对乌干达女农民采用生物强化作物的影响
低收入和中等收入国家的小农在采用技术方面面临若干限制。我们测试了旨在激励乌干达女性农民生产和消费生物强化橙肉甘薯作物的干预措施的相对功效。通过一项涉及210个社区8000多名女性农民的聚类随机对照试验,我们跟踪了干预措施对短期和长期采用、消费和健康结果的影响。我们的研究结果表明,提供投入和农业推广是一种有效的采用方法,导致超过60%的家庭种植作物,50%的家庭消费作物。强调作物健康益处的营养培训对种植的影响有限,但它使20%的家庭消费生物强化作物。将这两种方法与补充信贷和保险产品相结合,对采用的边际效应有限。我们还观察到,经过测试的干预措施改善了饮食多样性,并通过邻近社区的社会网络产生了溢出效应。我们发现很少有证据表明治疗对高阶结果(如视力、儿童健康和营养或收入)有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Agricultural Economics
American Journal of Agricultural Economics 管理科学-农业经济与政策
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
4.80%
发文量
77
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Agricultural Economics provides a forum for creative and scholarly work on the economics of agriculture and food, natural resources and the environment, and rural and community development throughout the world. Papers should relate to one of these areas, should have a problem orientation, and should demonstrate originality and innovation in analysis, methods, or application. Analyses of problems pertinent to research, extension, and teaching are equally encouraged, as is interdisciplinary research with a significant economic component. Review articles that offer a comprehensive and insightful survey of a relevant subject, consistent with the scope of the Journal as discussed above, will also be considered. All articles published, regardless of their nature, will be held to the same set of scholarly standards.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信