‘We're All (Cauliflower) Ears’: A Delphi Study Including Staff and Players to Co-Construct Sports Science and Medicine (Performance and Wellbeing) Research Priorities for Premiership Rugby

IF 3
Ben Jones, Omar Heyward, Matt Cross, Keith Stokes, Neil McCarthy, Simon Kemp, Emily Sheppy, Lottie Greenlees, Marc Beggs, Richard Bryan, Jamie Fulton, Rhys Griffiths, Joshua Harris, Rhys Hughes, Sharief Hendricks, Mark Lambert, Karen Jones, Mike Lancaster, Matt Lee, Adam Roberts, Nav Sandhu, Tom Sherriff, Mark Twiggs, Gregory Roe
{"title":"‘We're All (Cauliflower) Ears’: A Delphi Study Including Staff and Players to Co-Construct Sports Science and Medicine (Performance and Wellbeing) Research Priorities for Premiership Rugby","authors":"Ben Jones,&nbsp;Omar Heyward,&nbsp;Matt Cross,&nbsp;Keith Stokes,&nbsp;Neil McCarthy,&nbsp;Simon Kemp,&nbsp;Emily Sheppy,&nbsp;Lottie Greenlees,&nbsp;Marc Beggs,&nbsp;Richard Bryan,&nbsp;Jamie Fulton,&nbsp;Rhys Griffiths,&nbsp;Joshua Harris,&nbsp;Rhys Hughes,&nbsp;Sharief Hendricks,&nbsp;Mark Lambert,&nbsp;Karen Jones,&nbsp;Mike Lancaster,&nbsp;Matt Lee,&nbsp;Adam Roberts,&nbsp;Nav Sandhu,&nbsp;Tom Sherriff,&nbsp;Mark Twiggs,&nbsp;Gregory Roe","doi":"10.1002/ejsc.70007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Sports invest in research to optimise performance and enhance athlete wellbeing. Involving stakeholders allows research priorities to be determined, maximising the adoption and relevance of research findings. A three-round modified Delphi process was used to establish wellbeing and performance research priorities for Premiership Rugby (Professional men's rugby union competition in England). Up to 10 research priorities were provided during Round 1 (grouped into higher-order categories and themes via content analysis). In Rounds 2 and 3, participants ranked higher-order categories on a one to five Likert scale. Consensus was defined as ≥ 70% agreement. Sixty-five participants responded in Round 1 (41 and 32 in Rounds 2 and 3). Staff and player experience of working or playing in the Premiership was 11.0 (4.5–16.5) and 7.0 (6.0–8.5) years. Following Round 1, 393 research priorities were provided and 53 higher-order research priorities and 26 categories were identified, within three themes: performance, wellbeing and injury. Following Round 3, 21 research priorities reached consensus within performance (<i>n</i> = 7), wellbeing (<i>n</i> = 6) and injury (<i>n</i> = 8). Research priorities for a professional sports league, were established by the application of a pragmatic research lens, to ensure priorities were practically minded and also developed with minimal resource requirements, minimal burden for participants and in a short amount of time, which can be applied in other leagues. Research priorities deemed feasible and lacking a relevant evidence base can be addressed in future studies to maximise impact and compliment the ongoing research programmes already established by the professional league and governing body.</p>","PeriodicalId":93999,"journal":{"name":"European journal of sport science","volume":"25 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ejsc.70007","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of sport science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejsc.70007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sports invest in research to optimise performance and enhance athlete wellbeing. Involving stakeholders allows research priorities to be determined, maximising the adoption and relevance of research findings. A three-round modified Delphi process was used to establish wellbeing and performance research priorities for Premiership Rugby (Professional men's rugby union competition in England). Up to 10 research priorities were provided during Round 1 (grouped into higher-order categories and themes via content analysis). In Rounds 2 and 3, participants ranked higher-order categories on a one to five Likert scale. Consensus was defined as ≥ 70% agreement. Sixty-five participants responded in Round 1 (41 and 32 in Rounds 2 and 3). Staff and player experience of working or playing in the Premiership was 11.0 (4.5–16.5) and 7.0 (6.0–8.5) years. Following Round 1, 393 research priorities were provided and 53 higher-order research priorities and 26 categories were identified, within three themes: performance, wellbeing and injury. Following Round 3, 21 research priorities reached consensus within performance (n = 7), wellbeing (n = 6) and injury (n = 8). Research priorities for a professional sports league, were established by the application of a pragmatic research lens, to ensure priorities were practically minded and also developed with minimal resource requirements, minimal burden for participants and in a short amount of time, which can be applied in other leagues. Research priorities deemed feasible and lacking a relevant evidence base can be addressed in future studies to maximise impact and compliment the ongoing research programmes already established by the professional league and governing body.

“我们都是(花椰菜)耳朵”:一项德尔福研究,包括工作人员和球员共同构建超级橄榄球运动科学和医学(表现和健康)研究重点
体育投资于研究,以优化表现和提高运动员的健康。让利益相关者参与进来,可以确定研究重点,最大限度地提高研究成果的采用率和相关性。采用三轮改进的德尔菲过程来确定超级橄榄球(英国职业男子橄榄球联盟比赛)的健康和表现研究优先级。在第一轮中提供了多达10个研究重点(通过内容分析分为高阶类别和主题)。在第二轮和第三轮中,参与者按照1到5的李克特量表对高阶类别进行排名。共识定义为≥70%的同意。65名参与者在第一轮做出了回应(第2轮和第3轮分别为41名和32名)。工作人员和球员在英超工作或比赛的经验分别为11.0(4.5-16.5)和7.0(6.0-8.5)年。在第1393轮之后,提供了研究优先事项,并确定了53个高级研究优先事项和26个类别,分为三个主题:表现,健康和伤害。在第3轮之后,21个研究重点在表现(n = 7)、健康(n = 6)和伤害(n = 8)方面达成了共识。职业体育联盟的研究重点是通过应用务实的研究视角来确定的,以确保优先事项的实际考虑,并且在最短的时间内以最小的资源需求,最小的参与者负担进行开发,这可以应用于其他联盟。被认为是可行的、缺乏相关证据基础的研究优先事项可以在未来的研究中加以解决,以最大限度地发挥影响,并对职业联盟和管理机构已经建立的正在进行的研究项目进行补充。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信