CLUBB Reduces Low-Cloud Dependency on Shallow Convective Mixing in the Community Atmosphere Model: Insight From Stable Water Isotopes

IF 3.4 2区 地球科学 Q2 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
Michelle Frazer, Adriana Bailey, Jesse Nusbaumer, Jun Hu, Kyle Niezgoda, Sylvia Dee
{"title":"CLUBB Reduces Low-Cloud Dependency on Shallow Convective Mixing in the Community Atmosphere Model: Insight From Stable Water Isotopes","authors":"Michelle Frazer,&nbsp;Adriana Bailey,&nbsp;Jesse Nusbaumer,&nbsp;Jun Hu,&nbsp;Kyle Niezgoda,&nbsp;Sylvia Dee","doi":"10.1029/2024JD042053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Modeling experiments and field campaigns have evaluated shallow convective mixing as a potential constraint on the low-cloud climate feedback, which is critical for establishing climate sensitivity. Yet the apparent relationship between low-cloud fraction and shallow convective mixing differs substantially among general circulation models (GCMs), large eddy simulations, and both remote sensing and in situ observations. Here, we consider how changes in GCMs' representations of subgrid-scale vertical moist fluxes can alter the cloud-mixing relationship. Using vertical profiles of water vapor isotope ratios (<i>δD</i>) to characterize the strength of shallow convective mixing in a manner that can be compared directly to satellite observations, we evaluate the cloud-mixing relationship produced in tiered experiments with the Community Atmosphere Model (CAM). From versions 5 to 6 of CAM, the most notable physics change is CLUBB, a scheme that unifies the representation of shallow convection and boundary layer turbulence through a joint probability density function (PDF) for subgrid velocity and moisture. CLUBB reduces the covariance between low-cloud fraction and shallow convective mixing, producing a bivariate distribution that is more similar in character to monthly averaged satellite observations. Using parameter sensitivity experiments, we argue that CLUBB's ability to simulate skewness in the distribution of vertical velocity produces more isolated but stronger moist updrafts, which reduce the grid-mean low-cloud fraction while maintaining efficient hydrological connectivity between the boundary layer and the free troposphere. These results suggest that mixing is not an effective predictor of low-cloud feedback in GCMs with PDF closure schemes.</p>","PeriodicalId":15986,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres","volume":"130 13","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024JD042053","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JD042053","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Modeling experiments and field campaigns have evaluated shallow convective mixing as a potential constraint on the low-cloud climate feedback, which is critical for establishing climate sensitivity. Yet the apparent relationship between low-cloud fraction and shallow convective mixing differs substantially among general circulation models (GCMs), large eddy simulations, and both remote sensing and in situ observations. Here, we consider how changes in GCMs' representations of subgrid-scale vertical moist fluxes can alter the cloud-mixing relationship. Using vertical profiles of water vapor isotope ratios (δD) to characterize the strength of shallow convective mixing in a manner that can be compared directly to satellite observations, we evaluate the cloud-mixing relationship produced in tiered experiments with the Community Atmosphere Model (CAM). From versions 5 to 6 of CAM, the most notable physics change is CLUBB, a scheme that unifies the representation of shallow convection and boundary layer turbulence through a joint probability density function (PDF) for subgrid velocity and moisture. CLUBB reduces the covariance between low-cloud fraction and shallow convective mixing, producing a bivariate distribution that is more similar in character to monthly averaged satellite observations. Using parameter sensitivity experiments, we argue that CLUBB's ability to simulate skewness in the distribution of vertical velocity produces more isolated but stronger moist updrafts, which reduce the grid-mean low-cloud fraction while maintaining efficient hydrological connectivity between the boundary layer and the free troposphere. These results suggest that mixing is not an effective predictor of low-cloud feedback in GCMs with PDF closure schemes.

Abstract Image

CLUBB减少了群落大气模式中低云对浅对流混合的依赖:来自稳定水同位素的见解
模拟实验和野外活动评估了浅对流混合对低云气候反馈的潜在约束,这对建立气候敏感性至关重要。然而,在一般环流模式(GCMs)、大涡模拟以及遥感和现场观测中,低云分数和浅对流混合之间的明显关系存在很大差异。在这里,我们考虑了gcm对亚网格尺度垂直湿通量的表示变化如何改变云混合关系。我们利用水汽同位素比值(δD)的垂直剖面来表征浅层对流混合的强度,这种方式可以直接与卫星观测相比较,并利用群落大气模式(CAM)评估分层实验中产生的云混合关系。从CAM的第5版到第6版,最显著的物理变化是CLUBB方案,该方案通过子网格速度和湿度的联合概率密度函数(PDF)统一了浅层对流和边界层湍流的表示。CLUBB减少了低云分数和浅对流混合之间的协方差,产生了与月平均卫星观测更相似的二元分布。通过参数敏感性实验,我们认为CLUBB模拟垂直速度分布偏度的能力产生了更孤立但更强的湿润上升气流,这减少了网格平均低云部分,同时保持了边界层和自由对流层之间有效的水文连通性。这些结果表明,混合并不是具有PDF关闭方案的gcm中低云反馈的有效预测因子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres Earth and Planetary Sciences-Geophysics
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
11.40%
发文量
684
期刊介绍: JGR: Atmospheres publishes articles that advance and improve understanding of atmospheric properties and processes, including the interaction of the atmosphere with other components of the Earth system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信