Development and validation of a predictive model for in-hospital mortality in patients with coronary heart disease and renal insufficiency

IF 2.1 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Yahui Li , Hongsen Cai , Wei Zheng , Meijie Wang , Man Huang , Luyun Wang , Daowen Wang , Chunxia Zhao , Wenguang Hou , Hu Ding , Yan Wang , Hongling Zhu
{"title":"Development and validation of a predictive model for in-hospital mortality in patients with coronary heart disease and renal insufficiency","authors":"Yahui Li ,&nbsp;Hongsen Cai ,&nbsp;Wei Zheng ,&nbsp;Meijie Wang ,&nbsp;Man Huang ,&nbsp;Luyun Wang ,&nbsp;Daowen Wang ,&nbsp;Chunxia Zhao ,&nbsp;Wenguang Hou ,&nbsp;Hu Ding ,&nbsp;Yan Wang ,&nbsp;Hongling Zhu","doi":"10.1016/j.ijcrp.2025.200463","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Coronary Heart Disease (CHD) with renal insufficiency is a significant global health issue. This study aimed to develop and validate a predictive model for in-hospital mortality to enable early risk identification in these patients.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We analyzed data from 11,830 CHD patients with renal insufficiency treated at Tongji Hospital, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei Province, China (1994–2023). Among 113 clinical variables, five key features—age, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), creatine kinase (CK), and blood urea—were selected using Recursive Feature Elimination. Six machine learning models (Random Forest, XGBoost, Decision Tree, Neural Network, Logistic Regression, and Support Vector Machine) were developed and assessed for discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility. Temporal validation was performed using data from May 16, 2023 to October 31, 2024. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) were used for model interpretation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 11,830 patients, 694 (5.9 %) died during hospitalization. Among the six models, XGBoost showed the best overall performance in the test set, achieving the highest AUC (0.926), lowest Brier score (0.034), highest accuracy (0.957), and balanced sensitivity (0.381) and F1 score (0.512). Decision curve analysis confirmed its superior clinical utility. In a temporally independent validation cohort of 5983 patients, XGBoost maintained strong predictive performance (AUC = 0.901), demonstrating excellent robustness and generalizability.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The XGBoost-based model accurately predicts in-hospital mortality in CHD patients with renal insufficiency, supporting early risk stratification and clinical decision-making.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":29726,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Cardiology Cardiovascular Risk and Prevention","volume":"26 ","pages":"Article 200463"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Cardiology Cardiovascular Risk and Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772487525001011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Coronary Heart Disease (CHD) with renal insufficiency is a significant global health issue. This study aimed to develop and validate a predictive model for in-hospital mortality to enable early risk identification in these patients.

Methods

We analyzed data from 11,830 CHD patients with renal insufficiency treated at Tongji Hospital, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei Province, China (1994–2023). Among 113 clinical variables, five key features—age, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), creatine kinase (CK), and blood urea—were selected using Recursive Feature Elimination. Six machine learning models (Random Forest, XGBoost, Decision Tree, Neural Network, Logistic Regression, and Support Vector Machine) were developed and assessed for discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility. Temporal validation was performed using data from May 16, 2023 to October 31, 2024. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) were used for model interpretation.

Results

Of the 11,830 patients, 694 (5.9 %) died during hospitalization. Among the six models, XGBoost showed the best overall performance in the test set, achieving the highest AUC (0.926), lowest Brier score (0.034), highest accuracy (0.957), and balanced sensitivity (0.381) and F1 score (0.512). Decision curve analysis confirmed its superior clinical utility. In a temporally independent validation cohort of 5983 patients, XGBoost maintained strong predictive performance (AUC = 0.901), demonstrating excellent robustness and generalizability.

Conclusions

The XGBoost-based model accurately predicts in-hospital mortality in CHD patients with renal insufficiency, supporting early risk stratification and clinical decision-making.
冠心病合并肾功能不全患者住院死亡率预测模型的建立与验证
冠心病合并肾功能不全是一个重要的全球性健康问题。本研究旨在开发和验证院内死亡率的预测模型,以便对这些患者进行早期风险识别。方法分析1994-2023年在华中科技大学同济医院就诊的11,830例冠心病肾功能不全患者的资料。在113个临床变量中,5个关键特征——年龄、高敏c反应蛋白(hs-CRP)、估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)、肌酸激酶(CK)和血尿素——采用递归特征消除法进行筛选。研究人员开发了六种机器学习模型(随机森林、XGBoost、决策树、神经网络、逻辑回归和支持向量机),并对其鉴别、校准和临床应用进行了评估。使用2023年5月16日至2024年10月31日的数据进行时间验证。采用SHapley加性解释(SHAP)进行模型解释。结果11,830例患者中,694例(5.9%)在住院期间死亡。在6个模型中,XGBoost在测试集中的综合性能最好,AUC最高(0.926),Brier评分最低(0.034),准确率最高(0.957),平衡灵敏度0.381,F1评分0.512。决策曲线分析证实了其优越的临床应用价值。在5983例患者的时间独立验证队列中,XGBoost保持了较强的预测性能(AUC = 0.901),显示出出色的稳健性和泛化性。结论基于xgboost的模型能准确预测冠心病肾功能不全患者的住院死亡率,支持早期风险分层和临床决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
72 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信