Gender and socio-economic determinants of rural household adoption of clean energy practices in Uganda: Implications for energy transition pathways

IF 4.4 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Stella Tereka , Jon Geir Pétursson , Patrick Byakagaba , Auður H. Ingólfsdóttir
{"title":"Gender and socio-economic determinants of rural household adoption of clean energy practices in Uganda: Implications for energy transition pathways","authors":"Stella Tereka ,&nbsp;Jon Geir Pétursson ,&nbsp;Patrick Byakagaba ,&nbsp;Auður H. Ingólfsdóttir","doi":"10.1016/j.esd.2025.101780","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study explores how gender, socio-economic factors, and cultural norms shape rural household energy transitions in Uganda—an area underexamined in sub-national, gender-informed energy research. Using a mixed-methods approach, the study draws on data from 675 household surveys and 24 focus group discussions across six districts. Analytical methods included ordinal logistic regression using the Adjacent Categories Model (ACM) and thematic coding of qualitative data. The study draws on the Sustainable Livelihood Framework (SLF), Feminist Political Ecology (FPE), and energy ladder and stacking models.</div><div>Results show that 98 % of households continue to rely on biomass fuels, with energy stacking driven by affordability and supply constraints rather than deliberate progression toward cleaner options. Poverty, limited infrastructure, cultural preferences, and gendered divisions of labour and decision-making constrain the adoption of clean energy technologies. While women and girls predominantly collect firewood, male participation increased in certain districts (e.g., Adjumani and Luweero), reflecting localised shifts in labour roles. Income diversification, participation in savings groups (VSLAs), and knowledge of environmental issues significantly improve the likelihood of cleaner energy adoption.</div><div>The study contributes to the energy social science research by combining gender and context-specific analysis with mixed methods and a multi-theoretical framework. It underscores the need for integrated, locally grounded policy interventions that address structural and socio-cultural barriers to energy transition.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49209,"journal":{"name":"Energy for Sustainable Development","volume":"88 ","pages":"Article 101780"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy for Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0973082625001309","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explores how gender, socio-economic factors, and cultural norms shape rural household energy transitions in Uganda—an area underexamined in sub-national, gender-informed energy research. Using a mixed-methods approach, the study draws on data from 675 household surveys and 24 focus group discussions across six districts. Analytical methods included ordinal logistic regression using the Adjacent Categories Model (ACM) and thematic coding of qualitative data. The study draws on the Sustainable Livelihood Framework (SLF), Feminist Political Ecology (FPE), and energy ladder and stacking models.
Results show that 98 % of households continue to rely on biomass fuels, with energy stacking driven by affordability and supply constraints rather than deliberate progression toward cleaner options. Poverty, limited infrastructure, cultural preferences, and gendered divisions of labour and decision-making constrain the adoption of clean energy technologies. While women and girls predominantly collect firewood, male participation increased in certain districts (e.g., Adjumani and Luweero), reflecting localised shifts in labour roles. Income diversification, participation in savings groups (VSLAs), and knowledge of environmental issues significantly improve the likelihood of cleaner energy adoption.
The study contributes to the energy social science research by combining gender and context-specific analysis with mixed methods and a multi-theoretical framework. It underscores the need for integrated, locally grounded policy interventions that address structural and socio-cultural barriers to energy transition.
乌干达农村家庭采用清洁能源做法的性别和社会经济决定因素:对能源转型途径的影响
本研究探讨了性别、社会经济因素和文化规范如何影响乌干达农村家庭能源转型——这一领域在次国家级、性别信息丰富的能源研究中未得到充分研究。该研究采用混合方法,从六个地区的675个家庭调查和24个焦点小组讨论中获取数据。分析方法包括使用相邻类别模型(ACM)的有序逻辑回归和定性数据的主题编码。该研究借鉴了可持续生计框架(SLF)、女权主义政治生态学(FPE)、能量阶梯和堆叠模型。结果显示,98%的家庭继续依赖生物质燃料,能源堆积是由可负担性和供应限制驱动的,而不是刻意向更清洁的选择发展。贫困、有限的基础设施、文化偏好以及劳动和决策的性别分工限制了清洁能源技术的采用。虽然妇女和女孩主要收集柴火,但在某些地区(例如,亚祖玛尼和卢韦罗),男性的参与有所增加,这反映了劳动角色在当地的转变。收入多样化、参加储蓄团体以及对环境问题的了解大大提高了采用清洁能源的可能性。该研究采用混合方法和多理论框架,将性别与情境分析相结合,为能源社会科学研究做出了贡献。它强调需要采取综合的、立足当地的政策干预措施,解决能源转型的结构性和社会文化障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy for Sustainable Development
Energy for Sustainable Development ENERGY & FUELS-ENERGY & FUELS
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
187
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the International Energy Initiative, Energy for Sustainable Development is the journal for decision makers, managers, consultants, policy makers, planners and researchers in both government and non-government organizations. It publishes original research and reviews about energy in developing countries, sustainable development, energy resources, technologies, policies and interactions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信