Environmental regulation policy, firm endogenous capability, and green technological innovation: Evidence from a multi-period DID study in heavily polluting industries

IF 8.4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Shun Li
{"title":"Environmental regulation policy, firm endogenous capability, and green technological innovation: Evidence from a multi-period DID study in heavily polluting industries","authors":"Shun Li","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.126436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Although the global shift toward sustainable development is gaining momentum, there remains a lack of systematic empirical evidence on whether and how differences in firm endogenous capability moderate the effectiveness of environmental regulation policy (ERP) in promoting green technological innovation (GTI). This research analyses 1434 A-share listed companies in China's highly polluting industries utilizing panel data from 2013 to 2023 and applying a multi-period DID model to assess the effect of ERP on corporate GTI. To ensure robustness, the analysis incorporates parallel trend assessments, placebo tests, and a range of stability checks. The findings disclose three principal conclusions: (1) ERP significantly enhances GTI in heavily polluting firms, particularly in state-owned enterprises (SOEs) and those located in eastern China, although the effect wanes over time. (2) Certification in environmental management systems (EMS) enhances the policy's efficacy, highlighting the significance of differences in environmental governance capabilities related to firm-specific competencies; (3) The study reveals that digital transformation markedly enhances the influence of ERP on GTI for the entire sample; however, this moderating effect in heavily polluting firms is only evident with a two-period lag and is insignificant at other intervals. This indicates a gradual and deferred integration of digitalization and green transformation, highlighting the necessity of timely policy support for high-pollution sectors. This study enhances the micro-level comprehension of the impact of regulation on innovation, underscores the moderating influence of a firm's endogenous capabilities, and provides empirical insights for refining policy formulation and green transition strategies in pollution-intensive industries.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":356,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"391 ","pages":"Article 126436"},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479725024120","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although the global shift toward sustainable development is gaining momentum, there remains a lack of systematic empirical evidence on whether and how differences in firm endogenous capability moderate the effectiveness of environmental regulation policy (ERP) in promoting green technological innovation (GTI). This research analyses 1434 A-share listed companies in China's highly polluting industries utilizing panel data from 2013 to 2023 and applying a multi-period DID model to assess the effect of ERP on corporate GTI. To ensure robustness, the analysis incorporates parallel trend assessments, placebo tests, and a range of stability checks. The findings disclose three principal conclusions: (1) ERP significantly enhances GTI in heavily polluting firms, particularly in state-owned enterprises (SOEs) and those located in eastern China, although the effect wanes over time. (2) Certification in environmental management systems (EMS) enhances the policy's efficacy, highlighting the significance of differences in environmental governance capabilities related to firm-specific competencies; (3) The study reveals that digital transformation markedly enhances the influence of ERP on GTI for the entire sample; however, this moderating effect in heavily polluting firms is only evident with a two-period lag and is insignificant at other intervals. This indicates a gradual and deferred integration of digitalization and green transformation, highlighting the necessity of timely policy support for high-pollution sectors. This study enhances the micro-level comprehension of the impact of regulation on innovation, underscores the moderating influence of a firm's endogenous capabilities, and provides empirical insights for refining policy formulation and green transition strategies in pollution-intensive industries.
环境规制政策、企业内生能力与绿色技术创新——来自重污染行业多时期DID研究的证据
尽管全球向可持续发展的转变正在加速,但关于企业内生能力的差异是否以及如何调节环境监管政策(ERP)在促进绿色技术创新(GTI)方面的有效性,仍然缺乏系统的实证证据。本研究利用2013 - 2023年面板数据,运用多期DID模型,对1434家中国高污染行业a股上市公司进行分析,评估ERP对企业GTI的影响。为了确保稳健性,分析纳入了平行趋势评估、安慰剂测试和一系列稳定性检查。研究结果揭示了三个主要结论:(1)ERP显著提高了重污染企业的GTI,尤其是国有企业和位于中国东部的企业,尽管这种效应随着时间的推移而减弱。(2)环境管理体系(EMS)认证增强了政策的有效性,突出了与企业特定能力相关的环境治理能力差异的重要性;(3)研究发现,数字化转型显著增强了ERP对整个样本GTI的影响;然而,在重污染企业中,这种调节作用仅在两个周期滞后时才明显,而在其他时间段则不显著。这表明数字化与绿色转型的逐步和延迟融合,突出了对高污染行业及时提供政策支持的必要性。本研究增强了对监管对创新影响的微观理解,强调了企业内生能力的调节作用,为完善污染密集型产业的政策制定和绿色转型战略提供了实证见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Environmental Management
Journal of Environmental Management 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
5.70%
发文量
2477
审稿时长
84 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Management is a journal for the publication of peer reviewed, original research for all aspects of management and the managed use of the environment, both natural and man-made.Critical review articles are also welcome; submission of these is strongly encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信