ASSESSING TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY OF JSW MEASUREMENTS FOR THE MOST4 KNEE RADIOGRAPH POSITIONING PROTOCOL

N.A. Segal , N.H. Degala , T.D. Turmezei , J.A. Lynch
{"title":"ASSESSING TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY OF JSW MEASUREMENTS FOR THE MOST4 KNEE RADIOGRAPH POSITIONING PROTOCOL","authors":"N.A. Segal ,&nbsp;N.H. Degala ,&nbsp;T.D. Turmezei ,&nbsp;J.A. Lynch","doi":"10.1016/j.ostima.2025.100317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>INTRODUCTION</h3><div>Despite challenges, joint space width (JSW) on weight-bearing radiographs has remained the most common structural outcome for Phase III trials approved by either the FDA or the EMA. The JSW is the distance between the projected femur and tibia margins on radiographic images. Superimposition of the posterior and anterior edges of the tibial plateau is required to accurately measure radiographic JSW. Knees must be positioned correctly at both baseline and follow-up to maximize reliability of measures of JSW and reliability metrics are useful to calculate sample sizes for studies that depend on JSW measurements.</div></div><div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><div>To establish the test-retest reliability of knee joint 2D imaging protocols used by the Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study (MOST4) at the 20-year visit.</div></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><div>This cross-sectional, observational study compared joint space width (JSW) measurements between baseline and 2-week follow-up on PA radiographs acquired using an XFI scanner (Planmed Oy, Helsinki, Finland), using the same protocol used for the MOST4-V1 (20-year) visit. Participants were age ≥50 years, Kellgren-Lawrence grade 0-4, met MOST4 inclusion criteria, and could safely undergo WBCT (i.e. body mass&lt; 230kg, able to stand for 5 minutes with support). Participants were positioned using a customized Perspex frame which could be tilted in the sagittal plane (5°, 10° or 15°) to make the tibial plateaus coplanar with the x-ray beam for a PA radiograph of both knees. Shrout-Fleiss intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC 2.1) and limits of agreement (mm) were calculated for joint space width (JSW) measurements on radiographs acquired at baseline and 2-week follow-up. For the medial compartment, JSW was measured at 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, and 90% of the distance from the medial tibial spine (0%) to the outer margin of the medial tibial plateau (MTP; 100%). For the lateral compartment, JSW was measured at 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, and 90% of the distance from the lateral tibial spine (0%) to the outer margin of the lateral tibial plateau (100%). JSW could not be measured in one knee due to poor alignment of the MTP and some knees could not be measured at JSW 90% due to the relative position of the femur on the tibia.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><div>A total of 28 knees for 14 participants (demographics in Table 1) were imaged. ICC for JSW at each position in the medial and lateral compartments at JSW 50% to 90% are presented in Table 2 and limits of agreement are presented in Table 3. ICC for JSW measurements in the medial compartment were all ≥ 0.92 and ICC for JSW measurements in the lateral compartment were all ≥ 0.76.</div></div><div><h3>CONCLUSION</h3><div>These data support that the MOST4 knee radiograph acquisition protocol using the XFI has acceptable test-retest reliability for measurement of JSW at locations within the medial and lateral compartments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74378,"journal":{"name":"Osteoarthritis imaging","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100317"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Osteoarthritis imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772654125000571","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Despite challenges, joint space width (JSW) on weight-bearing radiographs has remained the most common structural outcome for Phase III trials approved by either the FDA or the EMA. The JSW is the distance between the projected femur and tibia margins on radiographic images. Superimposition of the posterior and anterior edges of the tibial plateau is required to accurately measure radiographic JSW. Knees must be positioned correctly at both baseline and follow-up to maximize reliability of measures of JSW and reliability metrics are useful to calculate sample sizes for studies that depend on JSW measurements.

OBJECTIVE

To establish the test-retest reliability of knee joint 2D imaging protocols used by the Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study (MOST4) at the 20-year visit.

METHODS

This cross-sectional, observational study compared joint space width (JSW) measurements between baseline and 2-week follow-up on PA radiographs acquired using an XFI scanner (Planmed Oy, Helsinki, Finland), using the same protocol used for the MOST4-V1 (20-year) visit. Participants were age ≥50 years, Kellgren-Lawrence grade 0-4, met MOST4 inclusion criteria, and could safely undergo WBCT (i.e. body mass< 230kg, able to stand for 5 minutes with support). Participants were positioned using a customized Perspex frame which could be tilted in the sagittal plane (5°, 10° or 15°) to make the tibial plateaus coplanar with the x-ray beam for a PA radiograph of both knees. Shrout-Fleiss intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC 2.1) and limits of agreement (mm) were calculated for joint space width (JSW) measurements on radiographs acquired at baseline and 2-week follow-up. For the medial compartment, JSW was measured at 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, and 90% of the distance from the medial tibial spine (0%) to the outer margin of the medial tibial plateau (MTP; 100%). For the lateral compartment, JSW was measured at 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, and 90% of the distance from the lateral tibial spine (0%) to the outer margin of the lateral tibial plateau (100%). JSW could not be measured in one knee due to poor alignment of the MTP and some knees could not be measured at JSW 90% due to the relative position of the femur on the tibia.

RESULTS

A total of 28 knees for 14 participants (demographics in Table 1) were imaged. ICC for JSW at each position in the medial and lateral compartments at JSW 50% to 90% are presented in Table 2 and limits of agreement are presented in Table 3. ICC for JSW measurements in the medial compartment were all ≥ 0.92 and ICC for JSW measurements in the lateral compartment were all ≥ 0.76.

CONCLUSION

These data support that the MOST4 knee radiograph acquisition protocol using the XFI has acceptable test-retest reliability for measurement of JSW at locations within the medial and lateral compartments.
评估JSW测量对大多数膝关节x线片定位方案的重测可靠性
尽管存在挑战,负重x线片上的关节间隙宽度(JSW)仍然是FDA或EMA批准的III期试验中最常见的结构结果。JSW是放射图像上投射的股骨和胫骨边缘之间的距离。胫骨平台前后边缘的叠加是精确测量x线摄影JSW的必要条件。膝关节必须在基线和随访时正确定位,以最大限度地提高JSW测量的可靠性,可靠性度量对于计算依赖于JSW测量的研究的样本量是有用的。目的建立多中心骨关节炎研究(MOST4)在20年随访中使用的膝关节二维成像方案的测试-重测可靠性。方法:这项横断面观察性研究比较了基线和2周随访期间的关节间隙宽度(JSW)测量,采用XFI扫描仪(Planmed Oy,芬兰赫尔辛基)获得的PA x线片,使用与MOST4-V1(20年)访问相同的方案。参与者年龄≥50岁,Kellgren-Lawrence评分0-4级,符合MOST4纳入标准,可以安全地接受WBCT(即身体质量<;230kg,可支撑站立5分钟)。参与者使用定制的有机玻璃框架定位,该框架可以在矢状面倾斜(5°,10°或15°),使胫骨平台与双膝PA x线片的x射线共面。计算基线和2周随访时获得的x线片关节间隙宽度(JSW)测量的shroutt - fleiss类内相关系数(ICC 2.1)和一致限(mm)。对于内侧腔室,在胫骨内侧脊柱(0%)到胫骨内侧平台外缘(MTP)距离的50%、60%、70%、80%和90%处测量JSW;100%)。对于外侧腔室,在胫骨外侧脊柱(0%)到胫骨外侧平台外缘(100%)距离的50%、60%、70%、80%和90%处测量JSW。由于MTP对齐不良,单膝无法测量JSW,由于股骨在胫骨上的相对位置,有些膝盖无法测量JSW 90%。结果14名受试者共28个膝关节(统计数据见表1)进行了tsa成像。表2列出了JSW内侧和外侧隔室每个位置的ICC值为50%至90%,表3列出了一致性的限制。内侧室JSW测量的ICC均≥0.92,外侧室JSW测量的ICC均≥0.76。结论:这些数据支持使用XFI的MOST4膝关节x线片获取方案在测量内侧和外侧隔室位置的JSW方面具有可接受的测试-重测可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Osteoarthritis imaging
Osteoarthritis imaging Radiology and Imaging
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信