Environmental risk assessment of sludge spreading in agriculture using toxicological thresholds representative of soil biological communities

Fulvio Onorati , Andrea Tornambé , Micol Bellucci , Andrea Paina , Chiara Maggi
{"title":"Environmental risk assessment of sludge spreading in agriculture using toxicological thresholds representative of soil biological communities","authors":"Fulvio Onorati ,&nbsp;Andrea Tornambé ,&nbsp;Micol Bellucci ,&nbsp;Andrea Paina ,&nbsp;Chiara Maggi","doi":"10.1016/j.scenv.2025.100267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The reuse of sludge for agricultural purposes is one of the strategies used worldwide to reduce landfill disposal whilst restoring the fertility of the soil, in a circular economy approach. This agricultural practice in Italy is regulated by the Italian Legislative Decree (LD) No. 99 of January 27, 1992, which provides chemical limits for some substances and the maximum admissible quantities of sludge that could be spread. In the present work, a synthetic index for estimating the environmental risk associated with sludge spreading is developed and experimentally applied, simulating the spreading of five different sludges. Environmental Risk Index (ERI) was estimated by taking into account the legal limits and the Predicted No Effect Concentrations (PNECs), which were specifically derived to Italian soils in this study, considering toxicological data referred to biotic communities living in Italy. Spreading simulations showed a “possible” hazard with respect to limits under LD No. 99/1992, and a “moderate” hazard level with respect to PNECs, mainly due to Dioxins and Furans, and Ni respectively (within the parameters considered by law). Whereas further studies are needed to estimate PNECs for other substances such as Plant Production Products (PPPs) and pharmaceuticals in order to preserve the structure and the functions of the soil ecosystem, the application of ERI showed a discrepancy between the list of parameters laid down in the regulation and the list of the most important environmental parameters for which soil-specific PNECs were inferred, with respect to the biological communities present in Italy. Given that, the list of substances of interest to be searched for in sludge and soil should be the same, giving priority to those that show the greatest ecotoxicological risks, such as PFAS. The weighted and integrated approach used in this study goes beyond the classic tabular approach of simple legal chemical limits providing with a more realistic framework for an integrated environmental risk assessment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101196,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Chemistry for the Environment","volume":"11 ","pages":"Article 100267"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Chemistry for the Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949839225000628","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The reuse of sludge for agricultural purposes is one of the strategies used worldwide to reduce landfill disposal whilst restoring the fertility of the soil, in a circular economy approach. This agricultural practice in Italy is regulated by the Italian Legislative Decree (LD) No. 99 of January 27, 1992, which provides chemical limits for some substances and the maximum admissible quantities of sludge that could be spread. In the present work, a synthetic index for estimating the environmental risk associated with sludge spreading is developed and experimentally applied, simulating the spreading of five different sludges. Environmental Risk Index (ERI) was estimated by taking into account the legal limits and the Predicted No Effect Concentrations (PNECs), which were specifically derived to Italian soils in this study, considering toxicological data referred to biotic communities living in Italy. Spreading simulations showed a “possible” hazard with respect to limits under LD No. 99/1992, and a “moderate” hazard level with respect to PNECs, mainly due to Dioxins and Furans, and Ni respectively (within the parameters considered by law). Whereas further studies are needed to estimate PNECs for other substances such as Plant Production Products (PPPs) and pharmaceuticals in order to preserve the structure and the functions of the soil ecosystem, the application of ERI showed a discrepancy between the list of parameters laid down in the regulation and the list of the most important environmental parameters for which soil-specific PNECs were inferred, with respect to the biological communities present in Italy. Given that, the list of substances of interest to be searched for in sludge and soil should be the same, giving priority to those that show the greatest ecotoxicological risks, such as PFAS. The weighted and integrated approach used in this study goes beyond the classic tabular approach of simple legal chemical limits providing with a more realistic framework for an integrated environmental risk assessment.
利用土壤生物群落毒理学阈值评价农业污泥扩散的环境风险
将污泥重新用于农业用途是世界范围内使用的战略之一,以循环经济的方式减少垃圾填埋场的处置,同时恢复土壤的肥力。意大利的这种农业做法受1992年1月27日第99号意大利法令的管制,该法令规定了某些物质的化学限量和可扩散污泥的最大允许数量。本文提出了一种评价污泥扩散相关环境风险的综合指标,并对五种不同污泥的扩散进行了模拟实验。环境风险指数(ERI)是通过考虑法律限制和预测无影响浓度(PNECs)来估计的,PNECs在本研究中专门针对意大利土壤,考虑了涉及意大利生物群落的毒理学数据。扩散模拟显示,相对于第99/1992号LD规定的限度,PNECs存在“可能”危害,相对于PNECs存在“中等”危害水平,主要是由于二恶英、呋喃和镍(在法律考虑的参数范围内)。为了保护土壤生态系统的结构和功能,还需要进一步的研究来估计其他物质(如植物生产产品(PPPs)和药品)的PNECs, ERI的应用表明,就意大利现有的生物群落而言,法规中规定的参数列表与推断土壤特异性PNECs的最重要环境参数列表之间存在差异。考虑到这一点,在污泥和土壤中搜索的感兴趣物质清单应该是相同的,优先考虑那些显示出最大生态毒理学风险的物质,如PFAS。本研究中使用的加权综合方法超越了简单的法定化学品限量的经典表格方法,为综合环境风险评估提供了更现实的框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信