How does teaching pedagogy affect students’ non-cognitive skills

IF 2.9 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Liping Liao , Jia Wu , Xiang Zhou
{"title":"How does teaching pedagogy affect students’ non-cognitive skills","authors":"Liping Liao ,&nbsp;Jia Wu ,&nbsp;Xiang Zhou","doi":"10.1016/j.asieco.2025.101986","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As an emerging teaching approach, group discussion is considered a strategy to promote students’ active involvement in the study. However, less is known about whether it is helpful for student skill formation. Using data on secondary school students and their teachers, we examine the effects of two pedagogies, namely, teaching in lectures and discussing in groups on students’ non-cognitive skills. We find that exposure to a high frequency of discussion in group pedagogy significantly lowers students’ psychological status, social skills, and adaptability, whereas the traditional teaching in the lecture approach has no effect. We show that the above negative effect is driven by students with low-educated parents, who are less likely to spend time with children, tutor children’s learning, and supervise children’s activities at home. Our results highlight that discussion in group pedagogy is not suitable for all students; its effect highly depends on parental inputs and parenting style.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47583,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Asian Economics","volume":"100 ","pages":"Article 101986"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Asian Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1049007825001101","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As an emerging teaching approach, group discussion is considered a strategy to promote students’ active involvement in the study. However, less is known about whether it is helpful for student skill formation. Using data on secondary school students and their teachers, we examine the effects of two pedagogies, namely, teaching in lectures and discussing in groups on students’ non-cognitive skills. We find that exposure to a high frequency of discussion in group pedagogy significantly lowers students’ psychological status, social skills, and adaptability, whereas the traditional teaching in the lecture approach has no effect. We show that the above negative effect is driven by students with low-educated parents, who are less likely to spend time with children, tutor children’s learning, and supervise children’s activities at home. Our results highlight that discussion in group pedagogy is not suitable for all students; its effect highly depends on parental inputs and parenting style.
教学方法如何影响学生的非认知技能
小组讨论作为一种新兴的教学方式,被认为是促进学生积极参与学习的一种策略。然而,人们对它是否有助于学生技能的形成知之甚少。利用中学生及其教师的数据,我们研究了两种教学法,即讲座教学和小组讨论对学生非认知技能的影响。我们发现,在小组教学法中接触高频率的讨论会显著降低学生的心理状态、社交技能和适应能力,而传统的课堂教学则没有效果。我们发现,上述负面影响是由父母受教育程度低的学生造成的,他们不太可能花时间和孩子在一起,辅导孩子的学习,并在家里监督孩子的活动。我们的研究结果表明,小组讨论教学法并不适合所有学生;其影响在很大程度上取决于父母的投入和父母的教养方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.40%
发文量
90
期刊介绍: The Journal of Asian Economics provides a forum for publication of increasingly growing research in Asian economic studies and a unique forum for continental Asian economic studies with focus on (i) special studies in adaptive innovation paradigms in Asian economic regimes, (ii) studies relative to unique dimensions of Asian economic development paradigm, as they are investigated by researchers, (iii) comparative studies of development paradigms in other developing continents, Latin America and Africa, (iv) the emerging new pattern of comparative advantages between Asian countries and the United States and North America.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信