The German Act on Corporate Due Diligence Obligations in supply chains: An empirical assessment of the agri-food supply chain based on experts’ perspectives

IF 6.9 Q1 OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
Abdulaziz Mardenli , Katharina Friederike Sträter , Christoph Herrmann , Dirk Sackmann
{"title":"The German Act on Corporate Due Diligence Obligations in supply chains: An empirical assessment of the agri-food supply chain based on experts’ perspectives","authors":"Abdulaziz Mardenli ,&nbsp;Katharina Friederike Sträter ,&nbsp;Christoph Herrmann ,&nbsp;Dirk Sackmann","doi":"10.1016/j.clscn.2025.100239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The consideration of social and environmental sustainability (in the following: sustainability) in supply chains (SCs) has gained importance in recent years. Consequently, the view that globally-acting companies should bear responsibility for their entire supply chain has become more and more established. Germany, to codify this responsibility, adopted the Act on Corporate Due Diligence Obligations in Supply Chains (LkSG) in 2021, which came into effect in 2023. The LkSG holds companies accountable for protecting human rights and complying with environmental standards. It requires them to monitor risks along their SCs and to identify and mitigate respective problems. Focusing on the agri-food supply chain, which is frequently the core of discussions regarding a lack of sustainability, and based on 17 semi-structured interviews with experts, this study exemplarily assesses companies’ perceptions of the LkSG’s requirements. It, therefore, aims to bridge the gap between the legal framework and practical implementation, thus, contributing to the understanding of the LkSG’s effectiveness in promoting sustainability. The findings reveal a dichotomous picture: large, established companies are perceived to be less affected due to their existing transparency and compliance infrastructure. On the contrary, smaller and less established companies are expected to face significant challenges, particularly in terms of administrative burden and resource allocation. Although the motivation behind the LkSG is generally seen as well-founded, its complexity and compliance costs are perceived as substantial, highlighting the tension between sustainability and profit, which is also reflected in the interviewees’ importance rating of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100253,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Logistics and Supply Chain","volume":"16 ","pages":"Article 100239"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner Logistics and Supply Chain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772390925000381","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The consideration of social and environmental sustainability (in the following: sustainability) in supply chains (SCs) has gained importance in recent years. Consequently, the view that globally-acting companies should bear responsibility for their entire supply chain has become more and more established. Germany, to codify this responsibility, adopted the Act on Corporate Due Diligence Obligations in Supply Chains (LkSG) in 2021, which came into effect in 2023. The LkSG holds companies accountable for protecting human rights and complying with environmental standards. It requires them to monitor risks along their SCs and to identify and mitigate respective problems. Focusing on the agri-food supply chain, which is frequently the core of discussions regarding a lack of sustainability, and based on 17 semi-structured interviews with experts, this study exemplarily assesses companies’ perceptions of the LkSG’s requirements. It, therefore, aims to bridge the gap between the legal framework and practical implementation, thus, contributing to the understanding of the LkSG’s effectiveness in promoting sustainability. The findings reveal a dichotomous picture: large, established companies are perceived to be less affected due to their existing transparency and compliance infrastructure. On the contrary, smaller and less established companies are expected to face significant challenges, particularly in terms of administrative burden and resource allocation. Although the motivation behind the LkSG is generally seen as well-founded, its complexity and compliance costs are perceived as substantial, highlighting the tension between sustainability and profit, which is also reflected in the interviewees’ importance rating of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs).
德国供应链企业尽职调查义务法:基于专家视角的农业食品供应链实证评估
近年来,供应链(SCs)中对社会和环境可持续性(以下简称可持续性)的考虑越来越重要。因此,全球企业应该对其整个供应链负责的观点越来越确立。为了将这一责任纳入法律,德国于2021年通过了《供应链企业尽职调查义务法》(LkSG),并于2023年生效。LkSG要求公司对保护人权和遵守环境标准负责。它要求它们监控自身安全体系的风险,识别并缓解各自的问题。聚焦于农业食品供应链,这通常是关于缺乏可持续性的讨论的核心,并基于对专家的17次半结构化访谈,本研究举例评估了公司对LkSG要求的看法。因此,它旨在弥合法律框架与实际执行之间的差距,从而有助于了解可持续发展小组在促进可持续发展方面的有效性。调查结果揭示了一个矛盾的局面:由于现有的透明度和合规基础设施,大型老牌公司被认为受到的影响较小。相反,规模较小和不太成熟的公司预计将面临重大挑战,特别是在行政负担和资源分配方面。虽然LkSG背后的动机通常被认为是有根据的,但其复杂性和合规成本被认为是巨大的,突出了可持续性和利润之间的紧张关系,这也反映在受访者对关键绩效指标(kpi)的重要性评级中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信