Visual representation of machine learning for low-contrast pay logging identification using 2D formation water resistivity variables

IF 3.6 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Jingzhe Guo , Yuxia Wang , Ya Li , Pan Zhang , Lifa Zhou
{"title":"Visual representation of machine learning for low-contrast pay logging identification using 2D formation water resistivity variables","authors":"Jingzhe Guo ,&nbsp;Yuxia Wang ,&nbsp;Ya Li ,&nbsp;Pan Zhang ,&nbsp;Lifa Zhou","doi":"10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2025.107518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Owing to their similar resistivity to water layers, low-contrast pay (LCP) zones may be misinterpreted. While machine learning (ML) methods offer advantages in identifying LCP zones over conventional approaches, their interpretability remains a challenge. This study employs novel approaches to construct sensitive parameters and develop visual representation models, aiming to achieve accurate identification and enhanced model interpretability of Jurassic LCPs in the southwestern Ordos Basin. The key points can be summarized as follows: 1) True and apparent formation water resistivities (FWRs) were calculated from conventional parameters. Based on FWR spectra, the innovative 2D FWR variables were constructed, thereby enhancing distinctions among production-layer types. 2) Nine models were trained using three base learners—support vector machine (SVM), decision tree (DT), and artificial neural network (ANN)—with three sets of input features: conventional parameters, true and apparent FWRs, and 2D FWR variables. The ANN model performed best with an F<sub>1</sub>-score of 95.55 % on the testing set when using 2D FWR variables. 3) Cross-plots of 2D FWR variables visually represent model performance. The ANN model's superior performance is attributed to its hidden layer neurons generating four demarcation lines that finely divide the cross-plot into nine zones for classification. In contrast, the SVM model divides the cross-plot into three zones using two demarcation lines, and the DT model's stepped demarcation lines lead to overfitting. The novelties can be summarized as follows: 1) During domain-specific feature transformation, the introduction of 2D FWR variables integrates both morphological information from logging curves and the differences between true and apparent FWRs. 2) Application of 2D FWR variables provides visual insights into ML model principles and performances, thereby facilitating a clearer understanding.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18189,"journal":{"name":"Marine and Petroleum Geology","volume":"181 ","pages":"Article 107518"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marine and Petroleum Geology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264817225002351","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Owing to their similar resistivity to water layers, low-contrast pay (LCP) zones may be misinterpreted. While machine learning (ML) methods offer advantages in identifying LCP zones over conventional approaches, their interpretability remains a challenge. This study employs novel approaches to construct sensitive parameters and develop visual representation models, aiming to achieve accurate identification and enhanced model interpretability of Jurassic LCPs in the southwestern Ordos Basin. The key points can be summarized as follows: 1) True and apparent formation water resistivities (FWRs) were calculated from conventional parameters. Based on FWR spectra, the innovative 2D FWR variables were constructed, thereby enhancing distinctions among production-layer types. 2) Nine models were trained using three base learners—support vector machine (SVM), decision tree (DT), and artificial neural network (ANN)—with three sets of input features: conventional parameters, true and apparent FWRs, and 2D FWR variables. The ANN model performed best with an F1-score of 95.55 % on the testing set when using 2D FWR variables. 3) Cross-plots of 2D FWR variables visually represent model performance. The ANN model's superior performance is attributed to its hidden layer neurons generating four demarcation lines that finely divide the cross-plot into nine zones for classification. In contrast, the SVM model divides the cross-plot into three zones using two demarcation lines, and the DT model's stepped demarcation lines lead to overfitting. The novelties can be summarized as follows: 1) During domain-specific feature transformation, the introduction of 2D FWR variables integrates both morphological information from logging curves and the differences between true and apparent FWRs. 2) Application of 2D FWR variables provides visual insights into ML model principles and performances, thereby facilitating a clearer understanding.
利用二维地层水电阻率变量进行低对比度储层测井识别的机器学习可视化表示
由于其电阻率与水层相似,低对比产层(LCP)可能会被误解。虽然机器学习(ML)方法在识别LCP区域方面比传统方法具有优势,但它们的可解释性仍然是一个挑战。本文采用新颖的方法构建敏感参数,建立可视化表征模型,以实现鄂尔多斯盆地西南部侏罗系lcp的准确识别和模型可解释性的提高。重点总结如下:1)根据常规参数计算地层水电阻率(FWRs)和地层水电阻率。基于FWR谱,构建了创新的二维FWR变量,从而增强了生产层类型的区分。2)使用支持向量机(SVM)、决策树(DT)和人工神经网络(ANN)三种基础学习器训练9个模型,并使用三组输入特征:常规参数、真实和表观FWR以及二维FWR变量。当使用二维FWR变量时,ANN模型在测试集上的f1得分为95.55%,表现最佳。3)二维FWR变量的交叉图直观地表示了模型的性能。人工神经网络模型的优异性能归功于其隐藏层神经元生成四条分界线,将交叉图精细划分为九个区域进行分类。相比之下,SVM模型使用两条分界线将交叉图划分为三个区域,DT模型的阶梯式分界线导致过拟合。其创新之处可概括为:1)在特定领域的特征转换过程中,引入二维FWR变量,将测井曲线的形态信息与真FWR和视FWR的差异结合起来。2)二维FWR变量的应用提供了对ML模型原理和性能的直观洞察,从而有助于更清晰的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Marine and Petroleum Geology
Marine and Petroleum Geology 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
475
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Marine and Petroleum Geology is the pre-eminent international forum for the exchange of multidisciplinary concepts, interpretations and techniques for all concerned with marine and petroleum geology in industry, government and academia. Rapid bimonthly publication allows early communications of papers or short communications to the geoscience community. Marine and Petroleum Geology is essential reading for geologists, geophysicists and explorationists in industry, government and academia working in the following areas: marine geology; basin analysis and evaluation; organic geochemistry; reserve/resource estimation; seismic stratigraphy; thermal models of basic evolution; sedimentary geology; continental margins; geophysical interpretation; structural geology/tectonics; formation evaluation techniques; well logging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信