Reducing fertilizer overuse via mechanized fertilization in China: Is outsourcing more effective?

IF 5.2 1区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Rong Cai , Hairan Zhao , Jie Ma
{"title":"Reducing fertilizer overuse via mechanized fertilization in China: Is outsourcing more effective?","authors":"Rong Cai ,&nbsp;Hairan Zhao ,&nbsp;Jie Ma","doi":"10.1016/j.chieco.2025.102491","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines the impact of different mechanized fertilization models- specifically, outsourcing fertilization services versus purchasing fertilization machinery- on fertilizer use intensity, using survey data from rice scale farms in East China. To address potential selection bias, we employ a treatment effect model to examine the average (homogeneous) impact of outsourcing and use an unconditional quantile regression model combined with a two-stage predictor substitution approach to explore the impact at different levels of fertilizer use intensity. Additionally, we construct a stochastic meta-frontier input distance function to evaluate fertilizer use efficiency and the fertilization technology gap ratio among farmers using different mechanized fertilization models. To further elucidate the mechanisms through which outsourcing influences fertilizer use intensity, we apply a fractional regression model. Empirical results reveal that outsourcing fertilization services significantly reduces fertilizer use intensity compared to the use of self-owned fertilization machinery, with an average decrease of 7.93 % per mu and 7.88 % per 100 kg of rice yield. Notably, the reduction is more pronounced among farmers with initially higher levels of fertilizer use intensity. While farmers using outsourcing achieve similar fertilizer use efficiency relative to their frontiers as those using self-owned fertilization machinery, they differ significantly in the fertilization technology gap ratio. Outsourcing significantly improves the technology gap ratio, suggesting that its advantage in reducing fertilizer use intensity primarily due to improved fertilization techniques.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48285,"journal":{"name":"中国经济评论","volume":"93 ","pages":"Article 102491"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国经济评论","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1043951X2500149X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines the impact of different mechanized fertilization models- specifically, outsourcing fertilization services versus purchasing fertilization machinery- on fertilizer use intensity, using survey data from rice scale farms in East China. To address potential selection bias, we employ a treatment effect model to examine the average (homogeneous) impact of outsourcing and use an unconditional quantile regression model combined with a two-stage predictor substitution approach to explore the impact at different levels of fertilizer use intensity. Additionally, we construct a stochastic meta-frontier input distance function to evaluate fertilizer use efficiency and the fertilization technology gap ratio among farmers using different mechanized fertilization models. To further elucidate the mechanisms through which outsourcing influences fertilizer use intensity, we apply a fractional regression model. Empirical results reveal that outsourcing fertilization services significantly reduces fertilizer use intensity compared to the use of self-owned fertilization machinery, with an average decrease of 7.93 % per mu and 7.88 % per 100 kg of rice yield. Notably, the reduction is more pronounced among farmers with initially higher levels of fertilizer use intensity. While farmers using outsourcing achieve similar fertilizer use efficiency relative to their frontiers as those using self-owned fertilization machinery, they differ significantly in the fertilization technology gap ratio. Outsourcing significantly improves the technology gap ratio, suggesting that its advantage in reducing fertilizer use intensity primarily due to improved fertilization techniques.
中国通过机械化施肥减少化肥过度使用:外包是否更有效?
本研究利用华东地区水稻规模农场的调查数据,考察了不同机械化施肥模式(特别是外包施肥服务与购买施肥机械)对肥料使用强度的影响。为了解决潜在的选择偏差,我们采用处理效应模型来检验外包的平均(同质)影响,并使用无条件分位数回归模型结合两阶段预测替代方法来探索不同肥料使用强度水平的影响。此外,构建随机元前沿投入距离函数,评价不同机械化施肥模式下农户的肥料利用效率和施肥技术差距比。为了进一步阐明外包影响肥料使用强度的机制,我们采用了分数回归模型。实证结果显示,与使用自有施肥机械相比,外包施肥服务显著降低了肥料使用强度,平均亩产减少7.93%,每百公斤水稻产量减少7.88%。值得注意的是,这种减少在最初肥料使用强度较高的农民中更为明显。使用外包的农户与使用自有施肥机械的农户相比,其在边境的肥料利用效率相似,但在施肥技术差距比上存在显著差异。外包显著提高了技术差距比,表明其在降低肥料使用强度方面的优势主要来自于施肥技术的改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
中国经济评论
中国经济评论 ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
4.40%
发文量
380
期刊介绍: The China Economic Review publishes original works of scholarship which add to the knowledge of the economy of China and to economies as a discipline. We seek, in particular, papers dealing with policy, performance and institutional change. Empirical papers normally use a formal model, a data set, and standard statistical techniques. Submissions are subjected to double-blind peer review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信