Fishing for insights: Tailoring a relevant choice experiment to explore low-literate community preferences in the design of marine protected areas

IF 4.8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 OCEANOGRAPHY
Laura Enthoven , Chloé Salmon , Steven Van Passel
{"title":"Fishing for insights: Tailoring a relevant choice experiment to explore low-literate community preferences in the design of marine protected areas","authors":"Laura Enthoven ,&nbsp;Chloé Salmon ,&nbsp;Steven Van Passel","doi":"10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2025.107840","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Discrete choice experiments (DCEs) can help explore stakeholders' preferences in the design of policy interventions, including nature conservation efforts. For a DCE to yield relevant and valid results, the careful selection of attributes and attribute levels is crucial. In this study, we offer a systematic mixed-methods approach to tailor highly pertinent DCEs conducted within low-literate communities, involving the use of a novel pictorial-based scoring tool. We illustrate our approach with a case study, describing how attributes and attribute levels were selected for a future DCE investigating local community preferences in the design of marine protected areas (MPAs) in Senegal. By 2030, the United Nations aims to protect 30 % of the ocean, which requires tripling the global coverage of MPAs, with a significant expansion expected in low-income countries. Social support, which largely depends on stakeholders’ perceptions, is essential for MPAs to achieve their conservation goals. MPAs vary in governance, management, and surrounding development features. In our case, MPA users, who depend on these areas for their livelihoods, identified the development of infrastructure for the fishing sector and basic community needs as the most impactful MPA features. Significant differences were noted between stakeholder groups: men underscored the importance of conflict resolution mechanisms, communication methods, and MPA boundary visibility, while women stated being more affected by specific fishing restrictions. In addition, MPA managers and officers did not fully grasp community members' perceptions. These findings highlight the need for managers to regularly consult local communities within MPAs using appropriate tools in order to ensure their long-term success. Our study allowed us to identify the most relevant attributes and levels in our case. The semi-qualitative approach proposed to DCE design offers a valuable tool for researchers planning to conduct DCEs in low-literate communities, helping them optimise their study design and ensure relevant findings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54698,"journal":{"name":"Ocean & Coastal Management","volume":"269 ","pages":"Article 107840"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ocean & Coastal Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964569125003023","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OCEANOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Discrete choice experiments (DCEs) can help explore stakeholders' preferences in the design of policy interventions, including nature conservation efforts. For a DCE to yield relevant and valid results, the careful selection of attributes and attribute levels is crucial. In this study, we offer a systematic mixed-methods approach to tailor highly pertinent DCEs conducted within low-literate communities, involving the use of a novel pictorial-based scoring tool. We illustrate our approach with a case study, describing how attributes and attribute levels were selected for a future DCE investigating local community preferences in the design of marine protected areas (MPAs) in Senegal. By 2030, the United Nations aims to protect 30 % of the ocean, which requires tripling the global coverage of MPAs, with a significant expansion expected in low-income countries. Social support, which largely depends on stakeholders’ perceptions, is essential for MPAs to achieve their conservation goals. MPAs vary in governance, management, and surrounding development features. In our case, MPA users, who depend on these areas for their livelihoods, identified the development of infrastructure for the fishing sector and basic community needs as the most impactful MPA features. Significant differences were noted between stakeholder groups: men underscored the importance of conflict resolution mechanisms, communication methods, and MPA boundary visibility, while women stated being more affected by specific fishing restrictions. In addition, MPA managers and officers did not fully grasp community members' perceptions. These findings highlight the need for managers to regularly consult local communities within MPAs using appropriate tools in order to ensure their long-term success. Our study allowed us to identify the most relevant attributes and levels in our case. The semi-qualitative approach proposed to DCE design offers a valuable tool for researchers planning to conduct DCEs in low-literate communities, helping them optimise their study design and ensure relevant findings.
为见解而钓鱼:定制一个相关的选择实验,以探索低文化社区在海洋保护区设计中的偏好
离散选择实验(dce)可以帮助探索利益相关者在政策干预设计中的偏好,包括自然保护工作。要使DCE产生相关且有效的结果,仔细选择属性和属性级别是至关重要的。在这项研究中,我们提供了一种系统的混合方法来定制在低文化社区进行的高度相关的dce,包括使用一种新颖的基于图片的评分工具。我们通过一个案例研究说明了我们的方法,描述了如何为未来的DCE选择属性和属性级别,以调查塞内加尔海洋保护区(MPAs)设计中当地社区的偏好。到2030年,联合国的目标是保护30%的海洋,这需要将海洋保护区的全球覆盖范围扩大两倍,预计低收入国家的海洋保护区将大幅扩大。社会支持在很大程度上取决于利益相关者的看法,这对海洋保护区实现其保护目标至关重要。海洋保护区在治理、管理和周边开发特性方面各不相同。在我们的案例中,依靠这些地区维持生计的海洋保护区使用者认为,渔业部门基础设施的发展和基本社区需求是海洋保护区最具影响力的特征。利益相关者群体之间存在显著差异:男性强调冲突解决机制、沟通方法和海洋保护区边界能见度的重要性,而女性则表示受到具体捕鱼限制的影响更大。此外,MPA管理者和官员没有充分了解社区成员的看法。这些发现突出表明,管理人员需要使用适当的工具定期咨询海洋保护区内的当地社区,以确保其长期成功。我们的研究使我们能够确定案例中最相关的属性和级别。对DCE设计提出的半定性方法为计划在低文化水平社区进行DCE的研究人员提供了一个有价值的工具,帮助他们优化研究设计并确保相关结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ocean & Coastal Management
Ocean & Coastal Management 环境科学-海洋学
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
15.20%
发文量
321
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Ocean & Coastal Management is the leading international journal dedicated to the study of all aspects of ocean and coastal management from the global to local levels. We publish rigorously peer-reviewed manuscripts from all disciplines, and inter-/trans-disciplinary and co-designed research, but all submissions must make clear the relevance to management and/or governance issues relevant to the sustainable development and conservation of oceans and coasts. Comparative studies (from sub-national to trans-national cases, and other management / policy arenas) are encouraged, as are studies that critically assess current management practices and governance approaches. Submissions involving robust analysis, development of theory, and improvement of management practice are especially welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信