Minhui Guan , Rong Li , Guangpeng Wang , Ziyan Li , Quan Shen , Enuo Peng , Jia Qu , Jun Lei , Bing Fu
{"title":"Health literacy scale for women with polycystic ovary syndrome (HL-PCO): Instrument development and cross-sectional validation study","authors":"Minhui Guan , Rong Li , Guangpeng Wang , Ziyan Li , Quan Shen , Enuo Peng , Jia Qu , Jun Lei , Bing Fu","doi":"10.1016/j.jpsychores.2025.112200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Health literacy is crucial in shaping health outcomes for individuals with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), influencing their disease perceptions, treatment adherence, and self-management behaviors. Women with PCOS often face challenges due to inadequate health literacy, leading to delayed diagnosis and low treatment compliance. However, there is a lack of specific tools to measure health literacy within the context of PCOS, hindering accurate assessments and targeted interventions.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>To address this gap, a health literacy scale for women with PCOS (HL-PCO) was developed and validated. The initial items were generated through a comprehensive literature review, in-depth interviews, and the Delphi method. A cross-sectional validation study was conducted at a tertiary hospital in Changsha, China, using classical test theory (CTT) and item response theory (IRT) for item selection. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach's α coefficient and split-half reliability, while validity was evaluated through various analyses.</div></div><div><h3>Result</h3><div>The HL-PCO scale retained 17 items across four factors: Acquisition, Understanding, Appraisal, and Application. Confirmatory factor analysis exhibited acceptable goodness-of-fit indices, and the Item Content Validity Index values surpassed 0.833. Robust results were also demonstrated through analyses of convergent validity, discriminant validity, and concurrent validity. The Cronbach's α coefficient for the HL-PCO was 0.930, and the split-half reliability coefficient amounted to 0.836.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The refined HL-PCO scale, comprising 17 items across four factors, has been rigorously validated as a reliable instrument. Its implementation has the potential to enhance health literacy assessment and improvement among women with PCOS, facilitating more effective health education interventions and ultimately improving patient outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50074,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychosomatic Research","volume":"195 ","pages":"Article 112200"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychosomatic Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022399925001643","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Health literacy is crucial in shaping health outcomes for individuals with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), influencing their disease perceptions, treatment adherence, and self-management behaviors. Women with PCOS often face challenges due to inadequate health literacy, leading to delayed diagnosis and low treatment compliance. However, there is a lack of specific tools to measure health literacy within the context of PCOS, hindering accurate assessments and targeted interventions.
Method
To address this gap, a health literacy scale for women with PCOS (HL-PCO) was developed and validated. The initial items were generated through a comprehensive literature review, in-depth interviews, and the Delphi method. A cross-sectional validation study was conducted at a tertiary hospital in Changsha, China, using classical test theory (CTT) and item response theory (IRT) for item selection. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach's α coefficient and split-half reliability, while validity was evaluated through various analyses.
Result
The HL-PCO scale retained 17 items across four factors: Acquisition, Understanding, Appraisal, and Application. Confirmatory factor analysis exhibited acceptable goodness-of-fit indices, and the Item Content Validity Index values surpassed 0.833. Robust results were also demonstrated through analyses of convergent validity, discriminant validity, and concurrent validity. The Cronbach's α coefficient for the HL-PCO was 0.930, and the split-half reliability coefficient amounted to 0.836.
Conclusion
The refined HL-PCO scale, comprising 17 items across four factors, has been rigorously validated as a reliable instrument. Its implementation has the potential to enhance health literacy assessment and improvement among women with PCOS, facilitating more effective health education interventions and ultimately improving patient outcomes.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Psychosomatic Research is a multidisciplinary research journal covering all aspects of the relationships between psychology and medicine. The scope is broad and ranges from basic human biological and psychological research to evaluations of treatment and services. Papers will normally be concerned with illness or patients rather than studies of healthy populations. Studies concerning special populations, such as the elderly and children and adolescents, are welcome. In addition to peer-reviewed original papers, the journal publishes editorials, reviews, and other papers related to the journal''s aims.