Health literacy scale for women with polycystic ovary syndrome (HL-PCO): Instrument development and cross-sectional validation study

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Minhui Guan , Rong Li , Guangpeng Wang , Ziyan Li , Quan Shen , Enuo Peng , Jia Qu , Jun Lei , Bing Fu
{"title":"Health literacy scale for women with polycystic ovary syndrome (HL-PCO): Instrument development and cross-sectional validation study","authors":"Minhui Guan ,&nbsp;Rong Li ,&nbsp;Guangpeng Wang ,&nbsp;Ziyan Li ,&nbsp;Quan Shen ,&nbsp;Enuo Peng ,&nbsp;Jia Qu ,&nbsp;Jun Lei ,&nbsp;Bing Fu","doi":"10.1016/j.jpsychores.2025.112200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Health literacy is crucial in shaping health outcomes for individuals with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), influencing their disease perceptions, treatment adherence, and self-management behaviors. Women with PCOS often face challenges due to inadequate health literacy, leading to delayed diagnosis and low treatment compliance. However, there is a lack of specific tools to measure health literacy within the context of PCOS, hindering accurate assessments and targeted interventions.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>To address this gap, a health literacy scale for women with PCOS (HL-PCO) was developed and validated. The initial items were generated through a comprehensive literature review, in-depth interviews, and the Delphi method. A cross-sectional validation study was conducted at a tertiary hospital in Changsha, China, using classical test theory (CTT) and item response theory (IRT) for item selection. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach's α coefficient and split-half reliability, while validity was evaluated through various analyses.</div></div><div><h3>Result</h3><div>The HL-PCO scale retained 17 items across four factors: Acquisition, Understanding, Appraisal, and Application. Confirmatory factor analysis exhibited acceptable goodness-of-fit indices, and the Item Content Validity Index values surpassed 0.833. Robust results were also demonstrated through analyses of convergent validity, discriminant validity, and concurrent validity. The Cronbach's α coefficient for the HL-PCO was 0.930, and the split-half reliability coefficient amounted to 0.836.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The refined HL-PCO scale, comprising 17 items across four factors, has been rigorously validated as a reliable instrument. Its implementation has the potential to enhance health literacy assessment and improvement among women with PCOS, facilitating more effective health education interventions and ultimately improving patient outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50074,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychosomatic Research","volume":"195 ","pages":"Article 112200"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychosomatic Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022399925001643","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Health literacy is crucial in shaping health outcomes for individuals with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), influencing their disease perceptions, treatment adherence, and self-management behaviors. Women with PCOS often face challenges due to inadequate health literacy, leading to delayed diagnosis and low treatment compliance. However, there is a lack of specific tools to measure health literacy within the context of PCOS, hindering accurate assessments and targeted interventions.

Method

To address this gap, a health literacy scale for women with PCOS (HL-PCO) was developed and validated. The initial items were generated through a comprehensive literature review, in-depth interviews, and the Delphi method. A cross-sectional validation study was conducted at a tertiary hospital in Changsha, China, using classical test theory (CTT) and item response theory (IRT) for item selection. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach's α coefficient and split-half reliability, while validity was evaluated through various analyses.

Result

The HL-PCO scale retained 17 items across four factors: Acquisition, Understanding, Appraisal, and Application. Confirmatory factor analysis exhibited acceptable goodness-of-fit indices, and the Item Content Validity Index values surpassed 0.833. Robust results were also demonstrated through analyses of convergent validity, discriminant validity, and concurrent validity. The Cronbach's α coefficient for the HL-PCO was 0.930, and the split-half reliability coefficient amounted to 0.836.

Conclusion

The refined HL-PCO scale, comprising 17 items across four factors, has been rigorously validated as a reliable instrument. Its implementation has the potential to enhance health literacy assessment and improvement among women with PCOS, facilitating more effective health education interventions and ultimately improving patient outcomes.
多囊卵巢综合征妇女健康素养量表(HL-PCO):工具开发和横断面验证研究
健康素养在塑造多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)患者的健康结果、影响其疾病认知、治疗依从性和自我管理行为方面至关重要。多囊卵巢综合征妇女往往面临挑战,由于健康素养不足,导致延误诊断和治疗依从性低。然而,缺乏具体的工具来衡量多囊卵巢综合征背景下的健康素养,阻碍了准确的评估和有针对性的干预措施。方法为解决这一差距,编制了PCOS女性健康素养量表(HL-PCO)并进行了验证。最初的项目是通过全面的文献回顾,深入访谈和德尔菲法产生的。采用经典测验理论(CTT)和项目反应理论(IRT)进行项目选择,在长沙市某三级医院进行横断面验证研究。信度采用Cronbach’s α系数和劈半信度进行评估,效度采用各种分析进行评估。结果HL-PCO量表在获得、理解、评价和应用四个因素中保留了17个条目。验证性因子分析的拟合优度指标可接受,项目内容效度指标超过0.833。通过对收敛效度、区别效度和并发效度的分析也证明了稳健的结果。HL-PCO的Cronbach's α系数为0.930,劈半信度系数为0.836。结论改进后的HL-PCO量表包含4个因素的17个项目,是一种可靠的量表。它的实施有可能加强对多囊症妇女健康素养的评估和改善,促进更有效的健康教育干预,并最终改善患者的治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
Journal of Psychosomatic Research 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
6.40%
发文量
314
审稿时长
6.2 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Psychosomatic Research is a multidisciplinary research journal covering all aspects of the relationships between psychology and medicine. The scope is broad and ranges from basic human biological and psychological research to evaluations of treatment and services. Papers will normally be concerned with illness or patients rather than studies of healthy populations. Studies concerning special populations, such as the elderly and children and adolescents, are welcome. In addition to peer-reviewed original papers, the journal publishes editorials, reviews, and other papers related to the journal''s aims.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信