Chengyu Zhang , Chuanzhen Su , Shulan Hu , Lei Li , Xian Li
{"title":"Environmental and life cycle assessment of organic Rankine cycle technology for industrial waste heat recovery","authors":"Chengyu Zhang , Chuanzhen Su , Shulan Hu , Lei Li , Xian Li","doi":"10.1016/j.jece.2025.117758","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Industrial waste heat recovery offers a significant opportunity to improve energy efficiency and reduce emissions, supporting carbon neutrality and sustainable development. Among various technologies, the organic Rankine cycle (ORC) stands out as a leading technology to exploit low-to-medium temperature heat sources for power generation. While the technical and economic aspects of ORC technology have been extensively studied, research on its sustainability profiles remains fragmented in the literature. This study provides a structured and comprehensive review of life cycle assessment (LCA) research on ORC systems in industrial applications. By systematically analyzing methodological choices such as functional units, system boundaries, inventory data, and impact assessment approaches, this review identifies key inconsistencies, research gaps, and sources of environmental burden across diverse industrial heat sources. The analysis reveals that component material composition, particularly of turbines and heat exchangers, and the choice of working fluids (e.g., low-GWP alternatives) significantly influence lifecycle impacts. It also emphasizes that cycle layout and system configuration can critically affect environmental outcomes. This work integrates fragmented LCA knowledge on ORC technology and proposes future research directions focused on standardized evaluation frameworks, improved data transparency, and sustainability-oriented system design. The findings offer practical guidance for researchers, policymakers, and engineers to improve the environmental and economic viability of ORC-based waste heat recovery solutions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15759,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering","volume":"13 5","pages":"Article 117758"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213343725024546","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Industrial waste heat recovery offers a significant opportunity to improve energy efficiency and reduce emissions, supporting carbon neutrality and sustainable development. Among various technologies, the organic Rankine cycle (ORC) stands out as a leading technology to exploit low-to-medium temperature heat sources for power generation. While the technical and economic aspects of ORC technology have been extensively studied, research on its sustainability profiles remains fragmented in the literature. This study provides a structured and comprehensive review of life cycle assessment (LCA) research on ORC systems in industrial applications. By systematically analyzing methodological choices such as functional units, system boundaries, inventory data, and impact assessment approaches, this review identifies key inconsistencies, research gaps, and sources of environmental burden across diverse industrial heat sources. The analysis reveals that component material composition, particularly of turbines and heat exchangers, and the choice of working fluids (e.g., low-GWP alternatives) significantly influence lifecycle impacts. It also emphasizes that cycle layout and system configuration can critically affect environmental outcomes. This work integrates fragmented LCA knowledge on ORC technology and proposes future research directions focused on standardized evaluation frameworks, improved data transparency, and sustainability-oriented system design. The findings offer practical guidance for researchers, policymakers, and engineers to improve the environmental and economic viability of ORC-based waste heat recovery solutions.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering (JECE) serves as a platform for the dissemination of original and innovative research focusing on the advancement of environmentally-friendly, sustainable technologies. JECE emphasizes the transition towards a carbon-neutral circular economy and a self-sufficient bio-based economy. Topics covered include soil, water, wastewater, and air decontamination; pollution monitoring, prevention, and control; advanced analytics, sensors, impact and risk assessment methodologies in environmental chemical engineering; resource recovery (water, nutrients, materials, energy); industrial ecology; valorization of waste streams; waste management (including e-waste); climate-water-energy-food nexus; novel materials for environmental, chemical, and energy applications; sustainability and environmental safety; water digitalization, water data science, and machine learning; process integration and intensification; recent developments in green chemistry for synthesis, catalysis, and energy; and original research on contaminants of emerging concern, persistent chemicals, and priority substances, including microplastics, nanoplastics, nanomaterials, micropollutants, antimicrobial resistance genes, and emerging pathogens (viruses, bacteria, parasites) of environmental significance.