The effects of dietary Cordyceps militaris substrate on growth, immunity, gonadal quality, and gut microbiota of the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus intermedius
IF 2.5 2区 农林科学Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Fenglin Tian , Shufeng Li , Haoran Xiao , Weiyan Li , Hao Wang , Yongjie Wang , Lingshu Han , Chong Zhao , Yaqing Chang , Jun Ding
{"title":"The effects of dietary Cordyceps militaris substrate on growth, immunity, gonadal quality, and gut microbiota of the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus intermedius","authors":"Fenglin Tian , Shufeng Li , Haoran Xiao , Weiyan Li , Hao Wang , Yongjie Wang , Lingshu Han , Chong Zhao , Yaqing Chang , Jun Ding","doi":"10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2025.116428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Sea urchin Strongylocentrotus intermedius is a commercially valuable marine species in China. <em>Cordyceps militaris</em> culture (CMC), containing cordycepin, polysaccharides, cordycepic acid, amino acids, trace elements, and vitamins, was tested in varying concentrations (0.5 %, 1.0 %, and 1.5 %) in sea urchin feed to evaluate effects on growth, immunity, gonadal quality, and gut microbiota. Five groups were established: a kelp group, a control group (basic feed), and three feed groups with CMC supplementation for two months. The addition of CMC had no significant effect on survival rate. The weight gain rate in the 0.5 % CMC group was similar to the 1.0 % CMC group but lower than the kelp group. The 0.5 % CMC group had the highest gonad wet weight, comparable to the 1.0 % CMC group, and its gonad index was significantly higher than the kelp and control groups (<em>P</em> < 0.05). In gonad texture, the 0.5 % CMC group showed the highest hardness (not significantly different from 1.0 % CMC), significantly higher springiness, adhesiveness, and chewiness compared to the control group (<em>P</em> < 0.05). Cohesiveness was significantly higher than in the control group (<em>P</em> < 0.05), with no differences among other groups. Brightness in the 0.5 % CMC group was significantly higher than in the kelp group, while redness and yellowness were significantly lower (<em>P</em> < 0.05). CMC significantly enhanced SOD, CAT, and POD activities, with the 0.5 % CMC group showing higher SOD activity than the kelp, control, and 1.5 % CMC groups (<em>P</em> < 0.05). POD and CAT activities in the 0.5 % group were significantly higher than in the control group (<em>P</em> < 0.05). The 0.5 % CMC group exhibited the highest Firmicutes abundance and significantly improved gut microbiota diversity (<em>P</em> < 0.05). In conclusion, added 0.5–1.0 % CMC improved growth, immunity, gonadal quality, and gut microbiota. While 0.5 % CMC showed consistent improvements, some parameters reached peak values at 1.0 %.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7861,"journal":{"name":"Animal Feed Science and Technology","volume":"327 ","pages":"Article 116428"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Feed Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377840125002238","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Sea urchin Strongylocentrotus intermedius is a commercially valuable marine species in China. Cordyceps militaris culture (CMC), containing cordycepin, polysaccharides, cordycepic acid, amino acids, trace elements, and vitamins, was tested in varying concentrations (0.5 %, 1.0 %, and 1.5 %) in sea urchin feed to evaluate effects on growth, immunity, gonadal quality, and gut microbiota. Five groups were established: a kelp group, a control group (basic feed), and three feed groups with CMC supplementation for two months. The addition of CMC had no significant effect on survival rate. The weight gain rate in the 0.5 % CMC group was similar to the 1.0 % CMC group but lower than the kelp group. The 0.5 % CMC group had the highest gonad wet weight, comparable to the 1.0 % CMC group, and its gonad index was significantly higher than the kelp and control groups (P < 0.05). In gonad texture, the 0.5 % CMC group showed the highest hardness (not significantly different from 1.0 % CMC), significantly higher springiness, adhesiveness, and chewiness compared to the control group (P < 0.05). Cohesiveness was significantly higher than in the control group (P < 0.05), with no differences among other groups. Brightness in the 0.5 % CMC group was significantly higher than in the kelp group, while redness and yellowness were significantly lower (P < 0.05). CMC significantly enhanced SOD, CAT, and POD activities, with the 0.5 % CMC group showing higher SOD activity than the kelp, control, and 1.5 % CMC groups (P < 0.05). POD and CAT activities in the 0.5 % group were significantly higher than in the control group (P < 0.05). The 0.5 % CMC group exhibited the highest Firmicutes abundance and significantly improved gut microbiota diversity (P < 0.05). In conclusion, added 0.5–1.0 % CMC improved growth, immunity, gonadal quality, and gut microbiota. While 0.5 % CMC showed consistent improvements, some parameters reached peak values at 1.0 %.
期刊介绍:
Animal Feed Science and Technology is a unique journal publishing scientific papers of international interest focusing on animal feeds and their feeding.
Papers describing research on feed for ruminants and non-ruminants, including poultry, horses, companion animals and aquatic animals, are welcome.
The journal covers the following areas:
Nutritive value of feeds (e.g., assessment, improvement)
Methods of conserving and processing feeds that affect their nutritional value
Agronomic and climatic factors influencing the nutritive value of feeds
Utilization of feeds and the improvement of such
Metabolic, production, reproduction and health responses, as well as potential environmental impacts, of diet inputs and feed technologies (e.g., feeds, feed additives, feed components, mycotoxins)
Mathematical models relating directly to animal-feed interactions
Analytical and experimental methods for feed evaluation
Environmental impacts of feed technologies in animal production.