The association of fluid balance with traumatic brain injury outcomes: A systematic review

Antonis Kalakoutas , Ashley Thomas , Thomas Fisher , Bethany Lane
{"title":"The association of fluid balance with traumatic brain injury outcomes: A systematic review","authors":"Antonis Kalakoutas ,&nbsp;Ashley Thomas ,&nbsp;Thomas Fisher ,&nbsp;Bethany Lane","doi":"10.1016/j.jointm.2025.01.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Fluid balance management is critical in moderate and severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) due to impaired cerebrovascular autoregulation. This study systematically reviews the association of fluid volume management with outcomes in moderate to severe TBI.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a systematic literature search on MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, The Cochrane Database, and bibliographies of included articles. Studies assessing fluid volume management and outcomes in moderate/severe TBI patients were included. Risk of bias, publication bias, and heterogeneity were comprehensively assessed. Primary outcomes were short/long-term mortality and neurological outcomes. Secondary outcomes included the effect on intracranial pressure, development of acute kidney injury (AKI), refractory intracranial hypertension (RIH), pulmonary edema/acute respiratory distress syndrome, length of stay, and length of mechanical ventilation. Fluid balance groups were categorized into restrictive, euvolemic, and liberal.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Out of 2668 studies identified, 12 studies (seven observational and five randomized controlled trials [RCTs]) involving 9184 TBI patients were included. Euvolemic fluid balance was associated with lower odds of mortality compared to restrictive (odds ratio [OR] = 0.39, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.27 to 0.57, <em>P</em> &lt;0.00001) and liberal groups (OR=0.47, 95% CI: 0.31 to 0.70, <em>P</em>=0.0003), and improved odds of favorable neurological outcomes compared to restrictive (OR=2.51, 95% CI: 1.72 to 3.66, <em>P</em> &lt;0.00001) and liberal groups (OR=1.86, 95% CI: 1.18 to 2.92, <em>P</em>=0.007). Euvolemic balance also reduced the odds of AKI and RIH, and shortened the mean length of mechanical ventilation compared to liberal fluid balance groups but not the restrictive ones.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Euvolemic fluid balance may improve key outcomes in TBI patients, including reduced mortality and better neurological outcomes. These findings underscore the need for RCTs to further assess euvolemic fluid management protocols in neurocritical care and their potential to inform clinical guidelines.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73799,"journal":{"name":"Journal of intensive medicine","volume":"5 3","pages":"Pages 276-287"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of intensive medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667100X25000155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Fluid balance management is critical in moderate and severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) due to impaired cerebrovascular autoregulation. This study systematically reviews the association of fluid volume management with outcomes in moderate to severe TBI.

Methods

We conducted a systematic literature search on MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, The Cochrane Database, and bibliographies of included articles. Studies assessing fluid volume management and outcomes in moderate/severe TBI patients were included. Risk of bias, publication bias, and heterogeneity were comprehensively assessed. Primary outcomes were short/long-term mortality and neurological outcomes. Secondary outcomes included the effect on intracranial pressure, development of acute kidney injury (AKI), refractory intracranial hypertension (RIH), pulmonary edema/acute respiratory distress syndrome, length of stay, and length of mechanical ventilation. Fluid balance groups were categorized into restrictive, euvolemic, and liberal.

Results

Out of 2668 studies identified, 12 studies (seven observational and five randomized controlled trials [RCTs]) involving 9184 TBI patients were included. Euvolemic fluid balance was associated with lower odds of mortality compared to restrictive (odds ratio [OR] = 0.39, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.27 to 0.57, P <0.00001) and liberal groups (OR=0.47, 95% CI: 0.31 to 0.70, P=0.0003), and improved odds of favorable neurological outcomes compared to restrictive (OR=2.51, 95% CI: 1.72 to 3.66, P <0.00001) and liberal groups (OR=1.86, 95% CI: 1.18 to 2.92, P=0.007). Euvolemic balance also reduced the odds of AKI and RIH, and shortened the mean length of mechanical ventilation compared to liberal fluid balance groups but not the restrictive ones.

Conclusions

Euvolemic fluid balance may improve key outcomes in TBI patients, including reduced mortality and better neurological outcomes. These findings underscore the need for RCTs to further assess euvolemic fluid management protocols in neurocritical care and their potential to inform clinical guidelines.
液体平衡与外伤性脑损伤结局的关系:系统综述
背景:由于脑血管自身调节功能受损,中重度创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者的体液平衡管理至关重要。本研究系统地回顾了液体容量管理与中重度脑外伤预后的关系。方法对MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL、Cochrane数据库进行系统文献检索,并纳入文献参考书目。研究评估了中/重度脑外伤患者的液量管理和预后。对偏倚风险、发表偏倚风险和异质性进行综合评估。主要结局是短期/长期死亡率和神经预后。次要结局包括对颅内压的影响、急性肾损伤(AKI)的发展、难治性颅内高压(RIH)、肺水肿/急性呼吸窘迫综合征、住院时间和机械通气时间。体液平衡组分为限制性组、大容量组和自由组。结果在2668项研究中,纳入了12项研究(7项观察性试验和5项随机对照试验[rct]),涉及9184例TBI患者。与限制性组(比值比[OR] = 0.39, 95%可信区间[CI]: 0.27至0.57,P <0.00001)和自由组(OR=0.47, 95% CI: 0.31至0.70,P=0.0003)相比,euvolic体液平衡与较低的死亡率相关,与限制性组(OR=2.51, 95% CI: 1.72至3.66,P <0.00001)和自由组(OR=1.86, 95% CI: 1.18至2.92,P=0.007)相比,神经系统预后良好的几率更高。与自由体液平衡组相比,体液平衡组也降低了AKI和RIH的几率,缩短了机械通气的平均时间,但与限制组相比没有。结论血容液平衡可改善TBI患者的关键预后,包括降低死亡率和改善神经系统预后。这些发现强调了rct进一步评估神经危重症护理中容血液管理方案及其为临床指南提供信息的潜力的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of intensive medicine
Journal of intensive medicine Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
58 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信