Hernán Dieguez , Federico Gallego , Gonzalo Camba Sans , Luciana Staiano , Pablo Baldassini , Andrea Ruggia , Verónica Aguerre , José María Paruelo
{"title":"Family farming stands out for its environmental performance in Uruguay's agricultural sector","authors":"Hernán Dieguez , Federico Gallego , Gonzalo Camba Sans , Luciana Staiano , Pablo Baldassini , Andrea Ruggia , Verónica Aguerre , José María Paruelo","doi":"10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104440","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context</h3><div>The environmental performance of family farming is strikingly under-documented, despite its recognized strategic importance within agri-food systems. Determining whether family farming has a distinct environmental footprint or not can provide valuable insights into its potential role in agricultural sustainability.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>We evaluated the environmental performance of family and non-family farms across different production systems and geomorphological regions in Uruguay.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Five locally validated synoptic indicators were assessed to describe aspects related to biodiversity, the supply of various Ecosystem Services (ES) and resilience to habitat loss: the proportion of natural habitats (i.e., natural grasslands and forests), the supply of supporting and regulating ES and its temporal trend, soil conservation and the functional diversity of non-natural habitats. We also calculated a synthetic environmental performance index to reflect overall environmental status across multiple indicators.</div></div><div><h3>Results and conclusions</h3><div>Amidst wide variability, family farms outperformed non-family farms across most indicators, regions, and production systems. Family farming likely fosters virtuous multifunctional landscapes, as our findings suggest that it maintains more natural habitats, supports greater functional diversity, and ensures a higher supply of ES. Family farms also demonstrated greater resilience to disturbances, such as the transformation of natural habitats, compared to non-family farms.</div></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><div>This study integrates nationwide, spatially-detailed remote-sensing indicators within a quantitative, multidimensional framework, providing unprecedented insight into the noteworthy environmental performance of family farming in Uruguay. These findings can guide research into the mechanisms driving this pattern and inform policies to bolster family farming at scales from local communities to regional and national jurisdictions in Uruguay and comparable agricultural contexts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7730,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Systems","volume":"229 ","pages":"Article 104440"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Systems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X25001805","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Context
The environmental performance of family farming is strikingly under-documented, despite its recognized strategic importance within agri-food systems. Determining whether family farming has a distinct environmental footprint or not can provide valuable insights into its potential role in agricultural sustainability.
Objective
We evaluated the environmental performance of family and non-family farms across different production systems and geomorphological regions in Uruguay.
Methods
Five locally validated synoptic indicators were assessed to describe aspects related to biodiversity, the supply of various Ecosystem Services (ES) and resilience to habitat loss: the proportion of natural habitats (i.e., natural grasslands and forests), the supply of supporting and regulating ES and its temporal trend, soil conservation and the functional diversity of non-natural habitats. We also calculated a synthetic environmental performance index to reflect overall environmental status across multiple indicators.
Results and conclusions
Amidst wide variability, family farms outperformed non-family farms across most indicators, regions, and production systems. Family farming likely fosters virtuous multifunctional landscapes, as our findings suggest that it maintains more natural habitats, supports greater functional diversity, and ensures a higher supply of ES. Family farms also demonstrated greater resilience to disturbances, such as the transformation of natural habitats, compared to non-family farms.
Significance
This study integrates nationwide, spatially-detailed remote-sensing indicators within a quantitative, multidimensional framework, providing unprecedented insight into the noteworthy environmental performance of family farming in Uruguay. These findings can guide research into the mechanisms driving this pattern and inform policies to bolster family farming at scales from local communities to regional and national jurisdictions in Uruguay and comparable agricultural contexts.
期刊介绍:
Agricultural Systems is an international journal that deals with interactions - among the components of agricultural systems, among hierarchical levels of agricultural systems, between agricultural and other land use systems, and between agricultural systems and their natural, social and economic environments.
The scope includes the development and application of systems analysis methodologies in the following areas:
Systems approaches in the sustainable intensification of agriculture; pathways for sustainable intensification; crop-livestock integration; farm-level resource allocation; quantification of benefits and trade-offs at farm to landscape levels; integrative, participatory and dynamic modelling approaches for qualitative and quantitative assessments of agricultural systems and decision making;
The interactions between agricultural and non-agricultural landscapes; the multiple services of agricultural systems; food security and the environment;
Global change and adaptation science; transformational adaptations as driven by changes in climate, policy, values and attitudes influencing the design of farming systems;
Development and application of farming systems design tools and methods for impact, scenario and case study analysis; managing the complexities of dynamic agricultural systems; innovation systems and multi stakeholder arrangements that support or promote change and (or) inform policy decisions.