Sex Differences in BP From an Automated Oscillometric Compared With Manual Device.

IF 8.2 1区 医学 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Tan V Bui,James E Sharman,Niamh Chapman,Martin G Schultz,Jennifer S Ringrose,Seana L Gall,Tomas L Bothe,Tammy M Brady,Dean S Picone
{"title":"Sex Differences in BP From an Automated Oscillometric Compared With Manual Device.","authors":"Tan V Bui,James E Sharman,Niamh Chapman,Martin G Schultz,Jennifer S Ringrose,Seana L Gall,Tomas L Bothe,Tammy M Brady,Dean S Picone","doi":"10.1161/hypertensionaha.124.24640","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nAutomated blood pressure (BP) devices may be less accurate in women than men, but this requires further investigation. This study aimed to determine sex differences in automated BP, measured with a single brand and model of device, compared with manual BP, with a focus on cuff sizes and associations with measures of adiposity.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nAutomated (Omron HEM-907XL) and manual BP were taken sequentially in a random order among a subsample of participants attending the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2017 to 2018. Anthropometry and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry were used to record body size and composition. Analyses, including multivariable regression to determine sex differences in BP, by cuff size, followed complex survey statistical principles.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nA total of 3735 participants (49.0% women [95% CI, 46.4-51.6], 45 years [43-46]) were included. In women, automated systolic BP (SBP) incrementally underestimated manual SBP across larger cuffs up to extra-large (-6.4 mm Hg [-8.0 to -4.9]). In men, automated SBP underestimated manual SBP only with extra-large cuffs (-2.4 mm Hg [95% CI-3.9 to -0.9]). Underestimation by automated SBP with extra-large cuffs was independently associated with all measures of body size indicative of increased adiposity in both women and men. Hypertension classification from automated and manual SBP had moderate agreement for adult/large cuffs (weighted kappa range 0.66-0.79) but weak agreement for extra-large cuffs (0.55-0.58) for women and men.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nThe automated device used in this study underestimated manual SBP at larger cuff sizes, which was associated with indices of adiposity. Poorer accuracy of automated BP in larger cuff sizes could contribute to inequitable BP-related health care for women and men and requires further investigation.","PeriodicalId":13042,"journal":{"name":"Hypertension","volume":"637 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/hypertensionaha.124.24640","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Automated blood pressure (BP) devices may be less accurate in women than men, but this requires further investigation. This study aimed to determine sex differences in automated BP, measured with a single brand and model of device, compared with manual BP, with a focus on cuff sizes and associations with measures of adiposity. METHODS Automated (Omron HEM-907XL) and manual BP were taken sequentially in a random order among a subsample of participants attending the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2017 to 2018. Anthropometry and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry were used to record body size and composition. Analyses, including multivariable regression to determine sex differences in BP, by cuff size, followed complex survey statistical principles. RESULTS A total of 3735 participants (49.0% women [95% CI, 46.4-51.6], 45 years [43-46]) were included. In women, automated systolic BP (SBP) incrementally underestimated manual SBP across larger cuffs up to extra-large (-6.4 mm Hg [-8.0 to -4.9]). In men, automated SBP underestimated manual SBP only with extra-large cuffs (-2.4 mm Hg [95% CI-3.9 to -0.9]). Underestimation by automated SBP with extra-large cuffs was independently associated with all measures of body size indicative of increased adiposity in both women and men. Hypertension classification from automated and manual SBP had moderate agreement for adult/large cuffs (weighted kappa range 0.66-0.79) but weak agreement for extra-large cuffs (0.55-0.58) for women and men. CONCLUSIONS The automated device used in this study underestimated manual SBP at larger cuff sizes, which was associated with indices of adiposity. Poorer accuracy of automated BP in larger cuff sizes could contribute to inequitable BP-related health care for women and men and requires further investigation.
自动测血压与手动测血压的性别差异。
背景:自动血压(BP)装置在女性中的准确性可能低于男性,但这需要进一步的研究。本研究旨在确定用单一品牌和型号的仪器测量的自动血压与手动血压的性别差异,重点关注袖带尺寸及其与肥胖测量的关联。方法在2017年至2018年参加美国国家健康与营养检查调查的参与者中按随机顺序依次进行自动(欧姆龙HEM-907XL)和手动BP。采用人体测量仪和双能x线吸收仪记录体型和成分。分析,包括多变量回归,以确定性别差异的血压,袖口大小,遵循复杂的调查统计原则。结果共纳入3735例受试者,其中女性49.0% [95% CI, 46.4-51.6],年龄45岁[43-46]。在女性中,自动收缩压(SBP)逐渐低估了手动收缩压,在更大的袖带上,直到特大号(-6.4 mm Hg[-8.0至-4.9])。在男性中,自动收缩压低于手动收缩压,只有在超大袖口时(-2.4 mm Hg [95% CI-3.9至-0.9])。自动收缩压与超大袖口的低估与所有表明女性和男性肥胖增加的体型测量独立相关。自动收缩压和手动收缩压对成人/大袖带(加权kappa范围为0.66-0.79)的高血压分类有中等一致性,但对女性和男性的超大袖带(0.55-0.58)的一致性较弱。结论:本研究中使用的自动化装置低估了袖带尺寸较大时的手动收缩压,这与肥胖指标有关。袖带尺寸越大,自动血压准确性越差,可能导致男女血压相关医疗保健不公平,需要进一步调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hypertension
Hypertension 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
15.90
自引率
4.80%
发文量
1006
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Hypertension presents top-tier articles on high blood pressure in each monthly release. These articles delve into basic science, clinical treatment, and prevention of hypertension and associated cardiovascular, metabolic, and renal conditions. Renowned for their lasting significance, these papers contribute to advancing our understanding and management of hypertension-related issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信