Differences in Phenotypic and Functional Aging Trajectories Among People Aging with Disability and the U.S. General Population.

Seeun Park,Ivan Molton,Lisa Bratzke
{"title":"Differences in Phenotypic and Functional Aging Trajectories Among People Aging with Disability and the U.S. General Population.","authors":"Seeun Park,Ivan Molton,Lisa Bratzke","doi":"10.1093/gerona/glaf136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nPeople aging with disability (PAwD) may experience distinct life course exposures that impact their aging trajectories, yet the extent to which these trajectories differ from those of the U.S. general population remains understudied. This study aimed to investigate the impact of long-term disability on phenotypic and functional aging trajectories, and assess the role of key demographic and social determinants on those trajectories.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nData from the 2006-2020 waves of the Health and Retirement Study were used. Phenotypic aging was measured by the metabolic dysfunction risk score (MDRS) and functional aging was operationalized through limitations in activities of daily living (ADL) and instrumental activities of daily living (IADL). Growth curve modeling was employed, adjusting for age, birth cohort, gender, race/ethnicity, and educational attainment.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nA total of 7,234 were included in the analysis, comprising 873 PAwD and 6,361 individuals from the general population. Results suggested pronounced disparities in phenotypic and functional aging trajectories between groups, with compounded vulnerabilities among marginalized subgroups. PAwD exhibited significantly higher MDRS and ADL/IADL scores, with more rapid escalation over time, suggesting premature and accelerated aging. Racial/ethnic minorities and individuals with lower education faced intersecting disadvantages in both domains. Woman aging with disability exhibited marginally greater MDRS than men. Cohort-disability interaction revealed that older PAwD cohorts experienced steeper functional decline, while younger cohorts showed accelerated metabolic dysregulation.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nThese findings highlight the imperative for inclusive public policies that address structural inequalities, particularly educational and racial disparities. Implementing preventative, disability-informed rehabilitative interventions is also essential to promote aging equity among PAwD.","PeriodicalId":22892,"journal":{"name":"The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glaf136","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND People aging with disability (PAwD) may experience distinct life course exposures that impact their aging trajectories, yet the extent to which these trajectories differ from those of the U.S. general population remains understudied. This study aimed to investigate the impact of long-term disability on phenotypic and functional aging trajectories, and assess the role of key demographic and social determinants on those trajectories. METHODS Data from the 2006-2020 waves of the Health and Retirement Study were used. Phenotypic aging was measured by the metabolic dysfunction risk score (MDRS) and functional aging was operationalized through limitations in activities of daily living (ADL) and instrumental activities of daily living (IADL). Growth curve modeling was employed, adjusting for age, birth cohort, gender, race/ethnicity, and educational attainment. RESULTS A total of 7,234 were included in the analysis, comprising 873 PAwD and 6,361 individuals from the general population. Results suggested pronounced disparities in phenotypic and functional aging trajectories between groups, with compounded vulnerabilities among marginalized subgroups. PAwD exhibited significantly higher MDRS and ADL/IADL scores, with more rapid escalation over time, suggesting premature and accelerated aging. Racial/ethnic minorities and individuals with lower education faced intersecting disadvantages in both domains. Woman aging with disability exhibited marginally greater MDRS than men. Cohort-disability interaction revealed that older PAwD cohorts experienced steeper functional decline, while younger cohorts showed accelerated metabolic dysregulation. CONCLUSIONS These findings highlight the imperative for inclusive public policies that address structural inequalities, particularly educational and racial disparities. Implementing preventative, disability-informed rehabilitative interventions is also essential to promote aging equity among PAwD.
老龄残疾人和美国普通人群表型和功能衰老轨迹的差异。
残障老年人(PAwD)可能会经历不同的生命历程暴露,影响他们的衰老轨迹,但这些轨迹与美国普通人群的差异程度仍未得到充分研究。本研究旨在探讨长期残疾对表型和功能衰老轨迹的影响,并评估关键的人口和社会决定因素在这些轨迹中的作用。方法采用2006-2020年健康与退休研究的数据。表型衰老通过代谢功能障碍风险评分(MDRS)来衡量,功能性衰老通过日常生活活动(ADL)和日常生活工具活动(IADL)的限制来实现。采用生长曲线模型,调整年龄、出生队列、性别、种族/民族和受教育程度。结果共纳入7234人,其中pad 873人,普通人群6361人。结果表明,不同群体在表型和功能衰老轨迹上存在明显差异,边缘亚群体的脆弱性更为复杂。pwd表现出更高的MDRS和ADL/IADL评分,随着时间的推移,升级速度更快,提示过早和加速衰老。少数民族和受教育程度较低的个人在这两个领域都面临交叉的不利条件。老年残疾女性的MDRS略高于男性。队列-残疾相互作用显示,老年pad队列经历了更陡峭的功能衰退,而年轻队列则表现出加速的代谢失调。结论:这些研究结果强调了制定包容性公共政策解决结构性不平等,特别是教育和种族不平等的必要性。实施预防性的残疾知情康复干预措施对于促进残疾人之间的老龄化公平也是至关重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信