Sex differences in the risk of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of population-based immunoreactivity surveys
IF 25.2 1区 医学Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Hannah M Rickman, Mphatso D Phiri, Helena R A Feasey, Maria Krutikov, Hui Shao, Katherine C Horton, David W Dowdy, Emily S Nightingale, Peter J Dodd, Elizabeth L Corbett, Peter MacPherson
{"title":"Sex differences in the risk of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of population-based immunoreactivity surveys","authors":"Hannah M Rickman, Mphatso D Phiri, Helena R A Feasey, Maria Krutikov, Hui Shao, Katherine C Horton, David W Dowdy, Emily S Nightingale, Peter J Dodd, Elizabeth L Corbett, Peter MacPherson","doi":"10.1016/s2468-2667(25)00120-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Background</h3>Tuberculosis killed 1·25 million people globally in 2023. Men have a 1·7 times higher tuberculosis incidence than women, but it is not known to what extent this discrepancy is driven by greater exposure to <em>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</em>. We aimed to analyse the effect of age and sex on <em>M tuberculosis</em> immunoreactivity.<h3>Methods</h3>In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we reviewed Embase, Global Health databases, Science Citation Index Expanded, and Global Index Medicus for population-based <em>M tuberculosis</em> immunoreactivity (with interferon-γ release assay or skin test) surveys done in high tuberculosis incidence settings from Jan 1, 1993, to Dec 31, 2022, with a sample size of at least 150 people. We included cross-sectional surveys, baseline surveys for interventional or cohort studies, and control groups of case–control studies with population-representative groups. We extracted data on <em>M tuberculosis</em> immunoreactivity prevalence, disaggregated by sex and age group. We constructed Bayesian hierarchical models, first of immunoreactivity prevalence by age and sex and second of the male-to-female (M:F) prevalence ratio by age. We analysed the effect of covariables including region, tuberculosis incidence, and study year. This study was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022360483).<h3>Findings</h3>We screened 26 517 studies, of which 167 met our inclusion criteria. Sex-disaggregated results were available from 80 studies (81 surveys), from 38 different countries, comprising data from 478 968 participants. We found little sex difference in <em>M tuberculosis</em> immunoreactivity in childhood (M:F prevalence ratio for children younger than 10 years was 0·95; 95% credible interval 0·90–1·01). However, from adolescence onwards, men experienced higher immunoreactivity conversion than women (1·4 times higher by age 30 years). This higher conversion rate cumulatively drove a higher immunoreactivity prevalence in men, with a prevalence ratio of 1·07 (95% credible interval 1·01–1·13) in those aged 10–19 years, 1·13 (1·06–1·20) in those aged 20–39 years, and 1·28 (1·19–1·37) for those aged 40 years and older. Adult men had consistently higher <em>M tuberculosis</em> prevalence across different settings, with low between-study heterogeneity in M:F prevalence ratio.<h3>Interpretation</h3>Men have higher <em>M tuberculosis</em> immunoreactivity risk than women, which is likely to be a key driver of the sex differences in global tuberculosis morbidity and mortality. This difference could be due to higher exposure through social and behavioural differences in time spent in congregate indoor spaces where tuberculosis transmission occurs, further amplified by longer duration of infectiousness in men, and age-assortative and sex-assortative mixing. Public health interventions addressing men's determinants of <em>M tuberculosis</em> exposure will be crucial to ending the tuberculosis epidemic.<h3>Funding</h3>Wellcome Trust and UK Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office.","PeriodicalId":56027,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Public Health","volume":"61 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":25.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/s2468-2667(25)00120-3","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Tuberculosis killed 1·25 million people globally in 2023. Men have a 1·7 times higher tuberculosis incidence than women, but it is not known to what extent this discrepancy is driven by greater exposure to Mycobacterium tuberculosis. We aimed to analyse the effect of age and sex on M tuberculosis immunoreactivity.
Methods
In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we reviewed Embase, Global Health databases, Science Citation Index Expanded, and Global Index Medicus for population-based M tuberculosis immunoreactivity (with interferon-γ release assay or skin test) surveys done in high tuberculosis incidence settings from Jan 1, 1993, to Dec 31, 2022, with a sample size of at least 150 people. We included cross-sectional surveys, baseline surveys for interventional or cohort studies, and control groups of case–control studies with population-representative groups. We extracted data on M tuberculosis immunoreactivity prevalence, disaggregated by sex and age group. We constructed Bayesian hierarchical models, first of immunoreactivity prevalence by age and sex and second of the male-to-female (M:F) prevalence ratio by age. We analysed the effect of covariables including region, tuberculosis incidence, and study year. This study was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022360483).
Findings
We screened 26 517 studies, of which 167 met our inclusion criteria. Sex-disaggregated results were available from 80 studies (81 surveys), from 38 different countries, comprising data from 478 968 participants. We found little sex difference in M tuberculosis immunoreactivity in childhood (M:F prevalence ratio for children younger than 10 years was 0·95; 95% credible interval 0·90–1·01). However, from adolescence onwards, men experienced higher immunoreactivity conversion than women (1·4 times higher by age 30 years). This higher conversion rate cumulatively drove a higher immunoreactivity prevalence in men, with a prevalence ratio of 1·07 (95% credible interval 1·01–1·13) in those aged 10–19 years, 1·13 (1·06–1·20) in those aged 20–39 years, and 1·28 (1·19–1·37) for those aged 40 years and older. Adult men had consistently higher M tuberculosis prevalence across different settings, with low between-study heterogeneity in M:F prevalence ratio.
Interpretation
Men have higher M tuberculosis immunoreactivity risk than women, which is likely to be a key driver of the sex differences in global tuberculosis morbidity and mortality. This difference could be due to higher exposure through social and behavioural differences in time spent in congregate indoor spaces where tuberculosis transmission occurs, further amplified by longer duration of infectiousness in men, and age-assortative and sex-assortative mixing. Public health interventions addressing men's determinants of M tuberculosis exposure will be crucial to ending the tuberculosis epidemic.
Funding
Wellcome Trust and UK Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office.
Lancet Public HealthMedicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
55.60
自引率
0.80%
发文量
305
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍:
The Lancet Public Health is committed to tackling the most pressing issues across all aspects of public health. We have a strong commitment to using science to improve health equity and social justice. In line with the values and vision of The Lancet, we take a broad and inclusive approach to public health and are interested in interdisciplinary research.
We publish a range of content types that can advance public health policies and outcomes. These include Articles, Review, Comment, and Correspondence. Learn more about the types of papers we publish.