Sergey Timonin, Tim Adair, Jennifer Welsh, Vladimir Canudas-Romo
{"title":"Socioeconomic inequalities in life expectancy in Australia, 2013–22: an ecological study of trends and contributions of causes of death","authors":"Sergey Timonin, Tim Adair, Jennifer Welsh, Vladimir Canudas-Romo","doi":"10.1016/s2468-2667(25)00138-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Background</h3>Despite having one of the highest life expectancies in the world, Australia has considerable subnational variation in health. Our aim was to examine contemporary trends in area-based socioeconomic inequalities in life expectancy, including age-specific and cause-specific components.<h3>Methods</h3>In this ecological study, we used individual death records and estimated resident population (ERP) to calculate life expectancy and cause-specific life-years lost for each decile of the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Index of Relative Socio-Economic Advantage and Disadvantage (IRSAD) for the whole population in Australia for 2013–22. We used the ABS Death Registrations data in the Person Linked Integrated Data Asset for individual-level records on all deaths that occurred and were registered in Australia, including year of death, age, sex, underlying cause of death, and Statistical Area Level 2 (SA2). We excluded death records in which SA2 was unknown and deaths and ERPs for people living in SA2 where IRSAD could not be defined due to small population counts. We measured inequality by the Slope Index of Inequality (SII) and the absolute gap between the most advantaged (D10) and most disadvantaged (D1) deciles.<h3>Findings</h3>Socioeconomic inequalities in life expectancy widened before reaching a maximum in 2016–18 at SII 4·7 years (95% CI 4·4–5·0) for females and in 2017–19 for males (6·8 years [6·4–7·1]), reflecting little improvement or even deterioration in life expectancy in the more disadvantaged areas. During the COVID-19 pandemic (from 2020) inequalities continued to narrow for males (they had begun to narrow just before the pandemic) but widened for females, largely due to COVID-19 mortality. The effect of other causes of death varied over time and differed by sex, with ischaemic heart disease, lung cancer, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease consistently being the largest contributors to life expectancy inequalities.<h3>Interpretation</h3>Socioeconomic inequalities in life expectancy in Australia were larger in 2020–22 than in 2013–15, despite some reductions just before and during (for males only) the COVID-19 pandemic. Sustained public health efforts to prevent and manage specific chronic conditions, as well as to reduce premature mortality from injuries (particularly suicide and traffic accidents) and substance misuse among populations in the most disadvantaged areas are needed to reduce socioeconomic inequalities in life expectancy and further increase longevity in Australia<h3>Funding</h3>Australian Research Council.","PeriodicalId":56027,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Public Health","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":25.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/s2468-2667(25)00138-0","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Despite having one of the highest life expectancies in the world, Australia has considerable subnational variation in health. Our aim was to examine contemporary trends in area-based socioeconomic inequalities in life expectancy, including age-specific and cause-specific components.
Methods
In this ecological study, we used individual death records and estimated resident population (ERP) to calculate life expectancy and cause-specific life-years lost for each decile of the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Index of Relative Socio-Economic Advantage and Disadvantage (IRSAD) for the whole population in Australia for 2013–22. We used the ABS Death Registrations data in the Person Linked Integrated Data Asset for individual-level records on all deaths that occurred and were registered in Australia, including year of death, age, sex, underlying cause of death, and Statistical Area Level 2 (SA2). We excluded death records in which SA2 was unknown and deaths and ERPs for people living in SA2 where IRSAD could not be defined due to small population counts. We measured inequality by the Slope Index of Inequality (SII) and the absolute gap between the most advantaged (D10) and most disadvantaged (D1) deciles.
Findings
Socioeconomic inequalities in life expectancy widened before reaching a maximum in 2016–18 at SII 4·7 years (95% CI 4·4–5·0) for females and in 2017–19 for males (6·8 years [6·4–7·1]), reflecting little improvement or even deterioration in life expectancy in the more disadvantaged areas. During the COVID-19 pandemic (from 2020) inequalities continued to narrow for males (they had begun to narrow just before the pandemic) but widened for females, largely due to COVID-19 mortality. The effect of other causes of death varied over time and differed by sex, with ischaemic heart disease, lung cancer, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease consistently being the largest contributors to life expectancy inequalities.
Interpretation
Socioeconomic inequalities in life expectancy in Australia were larger in 2020–22 than in 2013–15, despite some reductions just before and during (for males only) the COVID-19 pandemic. Sustained public health efforts to prevent and manage specific chronic conditions, as well as to reduce premature mortality from injuries (particularly suicide and traffic accidents) and substance misuse among populations in the most disadvantaged areas are needed to reduce socioeconomic inequalities in life expectancy and further increase longevity in Australia
Lancet Public HealthMedicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
55.60
自引率
0.80%
发文量
305
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍:
The Lancet Public Health is committed to tackling the most pressing issues across all aspects of public health. We have a strong commitment to using science to improve health equity and social justice. In line with the values and vision of The Lancet, we take a broad and inclusive approach to public health and are interested in interdisciplinary research.
We publish a range of content types that can advance public health policies and outcomes. These include Articles, Review, Comment, and Correspondence. Learn more about the types of papers we publish.