Is the human-wild boar co-survival zone possible? A risk assessment of human-wild boar conflict using a maximum entropy model (MaxEnt)

IF 2.7 Q1 FORESTRY
Yaxin Zhang , Xiaodi Zhao , Lu Wang , Kun Jin
{"title":"Is the human-wild boar co-survival zone possible? A risk assessment of human-wild boar conflict using a maximum entropy model (MaxEnt)","authors":"Yaxin Zhang ,&nbsp;Xiaodi Zhao ,&nbsp;Lu Wang ,&nbsp;Kun Jin","doi":"10.1016/j.tfp.2025.100914","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Human and wild boars were found to coexist within an environment where ecological and socio-economic systems intertwine, leading to conflict. To assess the potential for mutual dependency and constraint between humans and wild boars, the concept of \"co-survival\" was proposed. The study focused on Zixi, Chongyi, and Xiushui in Jiangxi Province, which served as a national pilot area for wild boar damage prevention. A total of 203 human-wild boar conflict points and 15 environmental variables from 2022 were selected to predict the spatial distribution of conflict risk. The results revealed the following: 1) The factors influencing human-wild boar co-survival were found to be closely related to both the behavior of wild boars and the natural and socio-economic conditions of the study area. Specifically, areas characterized by steeper slopes and located farther from residential areas or mountains tended to exhibit a larger co-survival zone. 2) Investment in wild boar invasion prevention infrastructure was positively correlated with the extent of the co-survival zone, indicating that increased investment contributed to the expansion of the shared living space between humans and wild boars. 3) Human-wild boar conflict was most prominent in agro-forestry transition zones, with fewer conflicts reported in high-standard farmland areas. Therefore, co-survival between humans and wild boars was considered feasible in low-risk and medium-risk zones under certain condition, where conflict remained within a manageable range.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36104,"journal":{"name":"Trees, Forests and People","volume":"21 ","pages":"Article 100914"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trees, Forests and People","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666719325001402","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Human and wild boars were found to coexist within an environment where ecological and socio-economic systems intertwine, leading to conflict. To assess the potential for mutual dependency and constraint between humans and wild boars, the concept of "co-survival" was proposed. The study focused on Zixi, Chongyi, and Xiushui in Jiangxi Province, which served as a national pilot area for wild boar damage prevention. A total of 203 human-wild boar conflict points and 15 environmental variables from 2022 were selected to predict the spatial distribution of conflict risk. The results revealed the following: 1) The factors influencing human-wild boar co-survival were found to be closely related to both the behavior of wild boars and the natural and socio-economic conditions of the study area. Specifically, areas characterized by steeper slopes and located farther from residential areas or mountains tended to exhibit a larger co-survival zone. 2) Investment in wild boar invasion prevention infrastructure was positively correlated with the extent of the co-survival zone, indicating that increased investment contributed to the expansion of the shared living space between humans and wild boars. 3) Human-wild boar conflict was most prominent in agro-forestry transition zones, with fewer conflicts reported in high-standard farmland areas. Therefore, co-survival between humans and wild boars was considered feasible in low-risk and medium-risk zones under certain condition, where conflict remained within a manageable range.
人类与野猪的共同生存区可能吗?基于最大熵模型的人与野猪冲突风险评估
人类和野猪共存的环境中,生态和社会经济系统交织在一起,导致冲突。为了评估人类与野猪之间相互依赖和约束的可能性,提出了“共同生存”的概念。以江西省子溪、崇义、秀水为研究对象,开展了全国野猪危害防治试点。选取2022年以来的203个人野猪冲突点和15个环境变量对冲突风险的空间分布进行预测。结果表明:1)影响人-野猪共同生存的因素不仅与野猪的行为有关,还与研究区自然和社会经济条件密切相关。具体而言,坡度更陡、远离居民区或山脉的地区往往表现出更大的共同生存区。2)预防野猪入侵基础设施投资与共同生存区域的范围正相关,表明投资的增加有助于扩大人与野猪的共同生存空间。(3)人野猪冲突在农林业过渡区最为突出,在高标准农田区较少。因此,在一定条件下,在冲突保持在可控范围内的低风险和中风险区域,人与野猪共同生存是可行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Trees, Forests and People
Trees, Forests and People Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
7.40%
发文量
172
审稿时长
56 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信