Integrating Point-of-Care Ultrasound in Hand Clinic: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Q3 Medicine
Jonah W. Perlmutter BSc , Ennie Olajide BS , Adham Elsherbini HBSc , Adam Mosa MD, MSc
{"title":"Integrating Point-of-Care Ultrasound in Hand Clinic: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Jonah W. Perlmutter BSc ,&nbsp;Ennie Olajide BS ,&nbsp;Adham Elsherbini HBSc ,&nbsp;Adam Mosa MD, MSc","doi":"10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is increasingly recognized as a valuable adjunct to physical examination in various clinical settings. Despite this, integration into the routine clinical practice of hand surgeons remains limited. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the diagnostic and clinical utility of POCUS in hand clinics for the assessment and management of common hand pathologies.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, MEDLINE and Embase were searched. Prospective studies evaluating POCUS use in hand pathologies were included. Two reviewers independently screened, extracted, and assessed data. Meta-analysis of diagnostic performance measures was conducted using a bivariate random effects model when appropriate.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Fifteen prospective studies involving 1,217 patients were included. POCUS was most commonly used to assess fractures (76.3%) and tendinous pathologies (20%). For hand fractures, pooled sensitivity and specificity were 81.95% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 78.03% to 85.31%) and 89.39% (95% CI: 87.12% to 91.30%), respectively. Among tendinous pathologies, POCUS demonstrated 100% sensitivity for trigger digits in three of four included studies. Limited evidence also supported high diagnostic performance for nail bed injuries (sensitivity: 97%, specificity: 95%).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>POCUS demonstrates high diagnostic accuracy for evaluating hand fractures and tendinous injuries while showing promise in the evaluation of nail bed trauma. Heterogeneity in study design, operator expertise, and reference standards was noted.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical relevance</h3><div>The incorporation of POCUS into the clinical practice of hand surgeons, supported by formal training and technological advancements such as artificial intelligence integration, may improve diagnostic efficiency, guide management, and enhance care delivery.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36920,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online","volume":"7 5","pages":"Article 100775"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589514125000957","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is increasingly recognized as a valuable adjunct to physical examination in various clinical settings. Despite this, integration into the routine clinical practice of hand surgeons remains limited. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the diagnostic and clinical utility of POCUS in hand clinics for the assessment and management of common hand pathologies.

Methods

Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, MEDLINE and Embase were searched. Prospective studies evaluating POCUS use in hand pathologies were included. Two reviewers independently screened, extracted, and assessed data. Meta-analysis of diagnostic performance measures was conducted using a bivariate random effects model when appropriate.

Results

Fifteen prospective studies involving 1,217 patients were included. POCUS was most commonly used to assess fractures (76.3%) and tendinous pathologies (20%). For hand fractures, pooled sensitivity and specificity were 81.95% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 78.03% to 85.31%) and 89.39% (95% CI: 87.12% to 91.30%), respectively. Among tendinous pathologies, POCUS demonstrated 100% sensitivity for trigger digits in three of four included studies. Limited evidence also supported high diagnostic performance for nail bed injuries (sensitivity: 97%, specificity: 95%).

Conclusions

POCUS demonstrates high diagnostic accuracy for evaluating hand fractures and tendinous injuries while showing promise in the evaluation of nail bed trauma. Heterogeneity in study design, operator expertise, and reference standards was noted.

Clinical relevance

The incorporation of POCUS into the clinical practice of hand surgeons, supported by formal training and technological advancements such as artificial intelligence integration, may improve diagnostic efficiency, guide management, and enhance care delivery.
整合点护理超声在手部诊所:系统回顾和荟萃分析
目的:定点超声(POCUS)越来越被认为是各种临床环境中身体检查的一种有价值的辅助手段。尽管如此,融入常规临床实践的手外科医生仍然有限。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估POCUS在手部诊所的诊断和临床应用,以评估和管理常见的手部病变。方法按照系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)指南的首选报告项目,检索MEDLINE和Embase。前瞻性研究评估POCUS在手部病变中的应用。两名审稿人独立筛选、提取和评估数据。在适当的情况下,采用双变量随机效应模型对诊断绩效指标进行meta分析。结果纳入15项前瞻性研究,涉及1217例患者。POCUS最常用于评估骨折(76.3%)和肌腱病变(20%)。对于手部骨折,合并敏感性和特异性分别为81.95%(95%可信区间[CI]: 78.03% ~ 85.31%)和89.39% (95% CI: 87.12% ~ 91.30%)。在肌腱病变中,在四项纳入的研究中,有三项POCUS对触发指的敏感性为100%。有限的证据也支持对甲床损伤的高诊断性能(敏感性:97%,特异性:95%)。结论spocus对手部骨折和肌腱损伤有较高的诊断准确性,对甲床外伤的诊断有较好的应用前景。注意到研究设计、操作人员专业知识和参考标准的异质性。临床相关性将POCUS纳入手外科医生的临床实践,辅以正规培训和人工智能集成等技术进步,可以提高诊断效率,指导管理,增强护理服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
111
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信