Security movements in extractive spaces: Dispossession, community-level grievance and resource conflicts in Ghana

IF 10.2 2区 经济学 0 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Phil Faanu , Nathan Andrews , Augustine Gyan , Sulemana Alhassan Saaka
{"title":"Security movements in extractive spaces: Dispossession, community-level grievance and resource conflicts in Ghana","authors":"Phil Faanu ,&nbsp;Nathan Andrews ,&nbsp;Augustine Gyan ,&nbsp;Sulemana Alhassan Saaka","doi":"10.1016/j.resourpol.2025.105669","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The African extractive sector is increasingly marked by grievance, conflict, and emerging security challenges. Focused on Ghana, this paper delves into community-level grievances and the concomitant security movements within extractive environments. Its central objective is to critically analyze these novel security movements as integral components of natural resource governance in Ghana's mining industry, elucidating their role in exacerbating or mitigating community-level grievances and dispossession. Additionally, it investigates the influence of security-related policies on other community grievances and security movements within natural resource governance. Our investigation reveals that the militarized policy approach to mineral extraction governance triggers new forms of security movements against mining activities. Secondly, we established that the criminalization of galamsey - illegal mining - breeds significant tension and grievance between citizens and the central government. Thirdly, mining companies’ failure to fulfill compensation and benefits agreements creates animosity, which results in violent confrontations with local communities. Finally, as a result, community members resort to resistance as a counter-hegemonic project against the adverse effects of mining activities and ill-willed government policies to manage mineral extraction. The paper, therefore, sheds light on these ‘new form security movements and their implications for community-level conflicts and grievances in Ghana's mining sector.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20970,"journal":{"name":"Resources Policy","volume":"107 ","pages":"Article 105669"},"PeriodicalIF":10.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420725002119","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The African extractive sector is increasingly marked by grievance, conflict, and emerging security challenges. Focused on Ghana, this paper delves into community-level grievances and the concomitant security movements within extractive environments. Its central objective is to critically analyze these novel security movements as integral components of natural resource governance in Ghana's mining industry, elucidating their role in exacerbating or mitigating community-level grievances and dispossession. Additionally, it investigates the influence of security-related policies on other community grievances and security movements within natural resource governance. Our investigation reveals that the militarized policy approach to mineral extraction governance triggers new forms of security movements against mining activities. Secondly, we established that the criminalization of galamsey - illegal mining - breeds significant tension and grievance between citizens and the central government. Thirdly, mining companies’ failure to fulfill compensation and benefits agreements creates animosity, which results in violent confrontations with local communities. Finally, as a result, community members resort to resistance as a counter-hegemonic project against the adverse effects of mining activities and ill-willed government policies to manage mineral extraction. The paper, therefore, sheds light on these ‘new form security movements and their implications for community-level conflicts and grievances in Ghana's mining sector.
采掘空间的安全运动:加纳的剥夺、社区层面的不满和资源冲突
非洲采掘业日益受到不满、冲突和新出现的安全挑战的影响。本文以加纳为重点,深入研究了采掘环境中社区层面的不满和随之而来的安全运动。其中心目标是批判性地分析这些新的安全运动,将其作为加纳采矿业自然资源治理的组成部分,阐明它们在加剧或减轻社区层面的不满和剥夺方面的作用。此外,它还调查了与安全有关的政策对自然资源治理中其他社区不满和安全运动的影响。我们的调查显示,矿产开采治理的军事化政策方法引发了针对采矿活动的新形式的安全运动。其次,我们确定将非法采矿定为刑事犯罪会在公民和中央政府之间造成严重的紧张和不满。第三,矿业公司未能履行补偿和福利协议造成敌意,从而导致与当地社区的暴力对抗。最后的结果是,社区成员采取抵抗行动,作为反对采矿活动的不利影响和政府管理矿物开采的不良政策的反霸权项目。因此,本文揭示了这些新形式的安全运动及其对加纳矿业部门社区层面冲突和不满的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Resources Policy
Resources Policy ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
13.40
自引率
23.50%
发文量
602
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Resources Policy is an international journal focused on the economics and policy aspects of mineral and fossil fuel extraction, production, and utilization. It targets individuals in academia, government, and industry. The journal seeks original research submissions analyzing public policy, economics, social science, geography, and finance in the fields of mining, non-fuel minerals, energy minerals, fossil fuels, and metals. Mineral economics topics covered include mineral market analysis, price analysis, project evaluation, mining and sustainable development, mineral resource rents, resource curse, mineral wealth and corruption, mineral taxation and regulation, strategic minerals and their supply, and the impact of mineral development on local communities and indigenous populations. The journal specifically excludes papers with agriculture, forestry, or fisheries as their primary focus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信