Risk Factors for Autism Spectrum Disorder in Individuals Born Preterm: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Population-Based Studies

IF 4 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Bo Yang , Nina Zaks , Eero Kajantie , Monica S.M. Persson , Abraham Reichenberg , Mika Gissler , Kari Risnes , Alexander Kolevzon , Ulrika Ådén , Ezra Susser , Martina Persson , Jonas F. Ludvigsson , Kristiina Tammimies , Liona C. Poon , Benjamin Yip , Nora Döring , Sven Sandin , Weiyao Yin
{"title":"Risk Factors for Autism Spectrum Disorder in Individuals Born Preterm: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Population-Based Studies","authors":"Bo Yang ,&nbsp;Nina Zaks ,&nbsp;Eero Kajantie ,&nbsp;Monica S.M. Persson ,&nbsp;Abraham Reichenberg ,&nbsp;Mika Gissler ,&nbsp;Kari Risnes ,&nbsp;Alexander Kolevzon ,&nbsp;Ulrika Ådén ,&nbsp;Ezra Susser ,&nbsp;Martina Persson ,&nbsp;Jonas F. Ludvigsson ,&nbsp;Kristiina Tammimies ,&nbsp;Liona C. Poon ,&nbsp;Benjamin Yip ,&nbsp;Nora Döring ,&nbsp;Sven Sandin ,&nbsp;Weiyao Yin","doi":"10.1016/j.bpsgos.2025.100535","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Preterm children are at an increased risk of autism spectrum disorder (ASD), although the determinants of ASD among them remain unclear. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we summarize the population-based literature on ASD risk factors in preterm-born individuals.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We searched Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science through September 2023 for population-based studies on ASD risk factors in preterm cohorts (&lt;37 weeks’ gestation). From 3921 articles, 19 met inclusion criteria. Registered in PROSPERO and following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, data were extracted and analyzed using fixed and random effects meta-analysis models. Primary outcomes included ASD risk factors, pooled when consistently examined in at least 2 studies.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The qualitative synthesis included 16 cohort studies, 2 case-control studies, and 1 cross-sectional study, while 3 cohort studies were included in the meta-analysis. Sample sizes ranged from 410 to 515,789. Male sex was the only risk factor eligible for meta-analysis and was associated with increased risk of ASD (relative risk 3.04; 95% CI, 2.02–4.57). Low birth weight suggested a potential positive association with ASD, while neonatal jaundice showed no clear link. Pooled estimates were unavailable for these exposures due to heterogeneity in exposure definitions and effect measures. All other risk factors were examined in two or fewer studies.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Significant knowledge gaps remain regarding the risk of ASD in individuals born preterm. The only consistent risk factor identified is male sex, with potential links to low birth weight. To better understand the differences in ASD etiology between preterm and term-born individuals, further research is crucial.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72373,"journal":{"name":"Biological psychiatry global open science","volume":"5 5","pages":"Article 100535"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological psychiatry global open science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667174325000898","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Preterm children are at an increased risk of autism spectrum disorder (ASD), although the determinants of ASD among them remain unclear. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we summarize the population-based literature on ASD risk factors in preterm-born individuals.

Methods

We searched Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science through September 2023 for population-based studies on ASD risk factors in preterm cohorts (<37 weeks’ gestation). From 3921 articles, 19 met inclusion criteria. Registered in PROSPERO and following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, data were extracted and analyzed using fixed and random effects meta-analysis models. Primary outcomes included ASD risk factors, pooled when consistently examined in at least 2 studies.

Results

The qualitative synthesis included 16 cohort studies, 2 case-control studies, and 1 cross-sectional study, while 3 cohort studies were included in the meta-analysis. Sample sizes ranged from 410 to 515,789. Male sex was the only risk factor eligible for meta-analysis and was associated with increased risk of ASD (relative risk 3.04; 95% CI, 2.02–4.57). Low birth weight suggested a potential positive association with ASD, while neonatal jaundice showed no clear link. Pooled estimates were unavailable for these exposures due to heterogeneity in exposure definitions and effect measures. All other risk factors were examined in two or fewer studies.

Conclusions

Significant knowledge gaps remain regarding the risk of ASD in individuals born preterm. The only consistent risk factor identified is male sex, with potential links to low birth weight. To better understand the differences in ASD etiology between preterm and term-born individuals, further research is crucial.
早产儿自闭症谱系障碍的危险因素:基于人群研究的系统回顾和荟萃分析
背景:早产儿患自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)的风险增加,尽管早产儿中ASD的决定因素尚不清楚。在这篇系统综述和荟萃分析中,我们总结了基于人群的早产儿ASD危险因素的文献。方法:我们检索了截至2023年9月的MEDLINE、Embase和Web of Science,检索了早产儿队列(妊娠37周)中基于人群的ASD危险因素研究。在3921篇文章中,有19篇符合纳入标准。在普洛斯彼罗注册并遵循系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)指南的首选报告项目,使用固定效应和随机效应荟萃分析模型提取和分析数据。主要结局包括ASD危险因素,在至少2项研究中一致检查时汇总。结果定性综合纳入16项队列研究、2项病例对照研究和1项横断面研究,meta分析纳入3项队列研究。样本量从410到515,789不等。男性是唯一符合荟萃分析条件的风险因素,与ASD风险增加相关(相对风险3.04;95% ci, 2.02-4.57)。低出生体重提示与自闭症谱系障碍有潜在的正相关,而新生儿黄疸没有明确的联系。由于暴露定义和效应测量的异质性,无法对这些暴露进行汇总估计。所有其他风险因素在两个或更少的研究中进行了检查。结论:关于早产儿患ASD的风险,目前仍存在显著的知识缺口。唯一一致确定的风险因素是男性,与低出生体重有潜在联系。为了更好地了解早产儿和足月出生个体之间ASD病因学的差异,进一步的研究是至关重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biological psychiatry global open science
Biological psychiatry global open science Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
91 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信