Are two networks one too many? Optimal network sizes under uncertain technological progress

IF 4.2 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Martin Quaas , Till Requate
{"title":"Are two networks one too many? Optimal network sizes under uncertain technological progress","authors":"Martin Quaas ,&nbsp;Till Requate","doi":"10.1016/j.econmod.2025.107176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Physical networks are often built under uncertainty about the future benefits of new network technologies. In this paper, we examine the trade-off between the gains from constructing a single, large physical network and the value of maintaining technological flexibility by building multiple, smaller networks. We derive conditions under which either one large network or several smaller networks are socially optimal, finding that socially optimal network allocations can arise as equilibria in a decentralized economy, but suboptimal equilibria may also occur. To address this, we propose a regulatory scheme that combines the auctioning of network licenses with subsidies to network operators, ensuring a socially optimal allocation through a unique equilibrium.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48419,"journal":{"name":"Economic Modelling","volume":"151 ","pages":"Article 107176"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Modelling","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264999325001713","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Physical networks are often built under uncertainty about the future benefits of new network technologies. In this paper, we examine the trade-off between the gains from constructing a single, large physical network and the value of maintaining technological flexibility by building multiple, smaller networks. We derive conditions under which either one large network or several smaller networks are socially optimal, finding that socially optimal network allocations can arise as equilibria in a decentralized economy, but suboptimal equilibria may also occur. To address this, we propose a regulatory scheme that combines the auctioning of network licenses with subsidies to network operators, ensuring a socially optimal allocation through a unique equilibrium.

Abstract Image

两个电视网一个是不是太多了?不确定技术进步下的最优网络规模
物理网络通常是在不确定新网络技术的未来效益的情况下建立的。在本文中,我们研究了构建单个大型物理网络的收益与通过构建多个较小网络来保持技术灵活性的价值之间的权衡。我们推导了一个大网络或几个小网络是社会最优的条件,发现社会最优网络分配可以在分散经济中作为均衡出现,但也可能出现次优均衡。为了解决这个问题,我们提出了一个监管方案,将网络许可证的拍卖与对网络运营商的补贴相结合,通过独特的均衡确保社会最优分配。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Economic Modelling
Economic Modelling ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
10.60%
发文量
295
期刊介绍: Economic Modelling fills a major gap in the economics literature, providing a single source of both theoretical and applied papers on economic modelling. The journal prime objective is to provide an international review of the state-of-the-art in economic modelling. Economic Modelling publishes the complete versions of many large-scale models of industrially advanced economies which have been developed for policy analysis. Examples are the Bank of England Model and the US Federal Reserve Board Model which had hitherto been unpublished. As individual models are revised and updated, the journal publishes subsequent papers dealing with these revisions, so keeping its readers as up to date as possible.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信