Validation of a rapid on-farm culture system for group classification of clinical mastitis-causing pathogens

Fernando J. Guardado Servellon , David L. Renaud , Bruno Joaquin Paredes Osorio , Kelsey L. Spence , Trevor J. DeVries , Rita Couto Serrenho
{"title":"Validation of a rapid on-farm culture system for group classification of clinical mastitis-causing pathogens","authors":"Fernando J. Guardado Servellon ,&nbsp;David L. Renaud ,&nbsp;Bruno Joaquin Paredes Osorio ,&nbsp;Kelsey L. Spence ,&nbsp;Trevor J. DeVries ,&nbsp;Rita Couto Serrenho","doi":"10.3168/jdsc.2024-0738","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The objective of this diagnostic accuracy study was to compare the use of a rapid tube test system (MastDecide [MD]; Quidee GmbH, Homberg, Germany) to aerobic milk culture for group classification of mastitis pathogens in dairy cattle. A total of 204 milk samples from cows with clinical mastitis (CM) were collected across 60 dairy herds in Ontario, Canada. Samples were collected by dairy producers and their staff and transported refrigerated to the University of Guelph Animal Health Laboratory (Guelph, ON, Canada) on the day of collection. Each sample was tested via MD (gram-positive, gram-negative, or “no growth”) and via aerobic milk culture followed by MALDI-TOF (reference method [RM]). The MD and RM results were interpreted at 14 and 24 h after incubation, respectively. An additional assessment was performed regarding the accuracy of intramammary antibiotic treatment decisions (gram-positive: to treat; gram-negative and “no growth” samples: not to treat). Test performance characteristics (overall accuracy, sensitivity [Se], specificity [Sp], and positive [PPV] and negative predictive value [NPV]) as well as Cohen's kappa coefficient (κ) were calculated. The RM results were classified as gram-positive (n = 107, 53%), gram-negative (n = 20, 10%), “no growth” (n = 51, 25%), other pathogens (n = 21, 10%), and mixed growth (gram-positive and gram-negative; n = 5, 3%). The Se of the MD test was 58% (95% CI: 47%–67%), 40% (19%–64%), and 61% (50%–72%) for gram-positive, gram-negative, and “no growth,” respectively. The Sp of the MD test was 73% (63%–81%), 84% (78%–89%), and 75% (66%–82%) for gram-positive, gram-negative, and “no growth,” respectively. The PPV of the MD test was 68% (57%–78%), 22% (10%–39%), and 62% (50%–73%) for gram-positive, gram-negative, and “no growth,” respectively; and the NPV was 63% (54%–72%), 93% (87%–96%), and 74% (65%–82%) for gram-positive, gram-negative, and “no growth,” respectively. The overall test accuracy for Gram stain classification analysis was 57%, with a κ of 0.30. Regarding intramammary antibiotic treatment, the MD test yielded a correct decision relative to the RM for 65% of the cases. Using this on-farm test as a primary guide in CM treatment decisions should be approached with caution, as the risk of false negatives may affect the ability to effectively treat CM cases.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94061,"journal":{"name":"JDS communications","volume":"6 4","pages":"Pages 562-566"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JDS communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266691022500050X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of this diagnostic accuracy study was to compare the use of a rapid tube test system (MastDecide [MD]; Quidee GmbH, Homberg, Germany) to aerobic milk culture for group classification of mastitis pathogens in dairy cattle. A total of 204 milk samples from cows with clinical mastitis (CM) were collected across 60 dairy herds in Ontario, Canada. Samples were collected by dairy producers and their staff and transported refrigerated to the University of Guelph Animal Health Laboratory (Guelph, ON, Canada) on the day of collection. Each sample was tested via MD (gram-positive, gram-negative, or “no growth”) and via aerobic milk culture followed by MALDI-TOF (reference method [RM]). The MD and RM results were interpreted at 14 and 24 h after incubation, respectively. An additional assessment was performed regarding the accuracy of intramammary antibiotic treatment decisions (gram-positive: to treat; gram-negative and “no growth” samples: not to treat). Test performance characteristics (overall accuracy, sensitivity [Se], specificity [Sp], and positive [PPV] and negative predictive value [NPV]) as well as Cohen's kappa coefficient (κ) were calculated. The RM results were classified as gram-positive (n = 107, 53%), gram-negative (n = 20, 10%), “no growth” (n = 51, 25%), other pathogens (n = 21, 10%), and mixed growth (gram-positive and gram-negative; n = 5, 3%). The Se of the MD test was 58% (95% CI: 47%–67%), 40% (19%–64%), and 61% (50%–72%) for gram-positive, gram-negative, and “no growth,” respectively. The Sp of the MD test was 73% (63%–81%), 84% (78%–89%), and 75% (66%–82%) for gram-positive, gram-negative, and “no growth,” respectively. The PPV of the MD test was 68% (57%–78%), 22% (10%–39%), and 62% (50%–73%) for gram-positive, gram-negative, and “no growth,” respectively; and the NPV was 63% (54%–72%), 93% (87%–96%), and 74% (65%–82%) for gram-positive, gram-negative, and “no growth,” respectively. The overall test accuracy for Gram stain classification analysis was 57%, with a κ of 0.30. Regarding intramammary antibiotic treatment, the MD test yielded a correct decision relative to the RM for 65% of the cases. Using this on-farm test as a primary guide in CM treatment decisions should be approached with caution, as the risk of false negatives may affect the ability to effectively treat CM cases.
用于临床乳腺炎致病菌分类的快速农场培养系统的验证
本诊断准确性研究的目的是比较快速试管测试系统(MastDecide [MD];Quidee GmbH, Homberg, Germany)采用有氧乳培养对奶牛乳腺炎病原体进行分组分类。在加拿大安大略省的60个奶牛群中收集了204个临床乳腺炎(CM)奶牛的牛奶样本。样品由乳制品生产商及其工作人员收集,并在收集当天冷藏运送到圭尔夫大学动物卫生实验室(加拿大圭尔夫,ON, Canada)。每个样品通过MD(革兰氏阳性、革兰氏阴性或“无生长”)和有氧乳培养进行检测,然后进行MALDI-TOF(参考方法[RM])。MD和RM结果分别在孵育后14和24 h进行解释。对乳腺内抗生素治疗决策的准确性进行了额外评估(革兰氏阳性:治疗;革兰氏阴性和“无生长”样本:不治疗)。计算试验性能特征(总体准确性、灵敏度[Se]、特异性[Sp]、阳性预测值[PPV]和阴性预测值[NPV])以及科恩kappa系数(κ)。RM结果分为革兰氏阳性(n = 107, 53%)、革兰氏阴性(n = 20, 10%)、“无生长”(n = 51, 25%)、其他病原体(n = 21, 10%)和混合生长(革兰氏阳性和革兰氏阴性;N = 5,3 %)。革兰氏阳性、革兰氏阴性和“无生长”的MD检测Se分别为58% (95% CI: 47%-67%)、40%(19%-64%)和61%(50%-72%)。对于革兰氏阳性、革兰氏阴性和“无生长”,MD试验的Sp分别为73%(63% ~ 81%)、84%(78% ~ 89%)和75%(66% ~ 82%)。对于革兰氏阳性、革兰氏阴性和“无生长”,MD试验的PPV分别为68%(57%-78%)、22%(10%-39%)和62% (50%-73%);革兰氏阳性、革兰氏阴性和“无生长”的净现值分别为63%(54% ~ 72%)、93%(87% ~ 96%)和74%(65% ~ 82%)。革兰氏染色分类分析的总体检测准确率为57%,κ为0.30。关于乳腺内抗生素治疗,相对于RM, MD测试对65%的病例产生了正确的决定。使用这种农场测试作为CM治疗决策的主要指导应谨慎对待,因为假阴性的风险可能影响有效治疗CM病例的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JDS communications
JDS communications Animal Science and Zoology
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信