Evaluating bacterial growth in raw, frozen, and heat-treated colostrum inoculated with fecal Escherichia coli

A.M. McKane, T.A. Westhoff, S. Klaessig, C. Altier, K.E. Bell, P.D. Pavinski Bitar, S. Mann
{"title":"Evaluating bacterial growth in raw, frozen, and heat-treated colostrum inoculated with fecal Escherichia coli","authors":"A.M. McKane,&nbsp;T.A. Westhoff,&nbsp;S. Klaessig,&nbsp;C. Altier,&nbsp;K.E. Bell,&nbsp;P.D. Pavinski Bitar,&nbsp;S. Mann","doi":"10.3168/jdsc.2025-0756","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Providing newborn calves with sufficient high-quality colostrum is a critical calf-management strategy to support health, survival, and future productivity. Unfortunately, colostrum may also serve as a fomite for disease when contaminated with bacteria at harvest, during storage, or during reheating before feeding. Thermal processing, including heat treatment (HT; 60°C for 60 min) and freezing (FR; −20°C), are common strategies to manage bacterial contamination. Although both strategies maintain IgG concentrations, they destroy colostral immune cells, and HT is known to decrease the concentration and activity of certain bioactive factors such as complement and IgA. We hypothesized that HT and FR would influence the inherent antibacterial properties of bovine colostrum compared with unprocessed, refrigerated colostrum (RW). Our objective was thus to compare growth of <em>Escherichia coli</em> in RW, HT, and FR bovine colostrum. Sterile colostrum samples were collected from Holstein cows (n = 11) on a commercial dairy in New York State and divided into 4 aliquots. One aliquot was submitted for bacterial culture to exclude samples with any bacterial growth (n = 4). The remaining 7 samples were used for the experiment. Aliquots were either RW (4°C for 20 h; n = 7), HT (60°C for 60 min, then 4°C for 19 h; n = 7), or FR (−20°C for 20 h; n = 7). Immediately before inoculation of samples for a bacterial kinetics assay, a dried bovine colostrum-based replacer (CR; Ultra Start 150, Sav-A-Calf, Chilton, WI) was prepared from a single bag according to package instructions as a nutrient-rich control (n = 7). The prepared CR aliquots underwent bacterial culture to ascertain the absence of bacterial growth before inoculation. To simulate contamination that may occur on-farm, all samples were inoculated with 10<sup>4</sup> cfu/mL <em>E. coli</em> (WM1; 060913 P0lA, isolated from bovine feces) and tested in a bacterial kinetics assay at 37°C. At 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 h, growth of <em>E. coli</em> was quantified on MacConkey agar plates inoculated at 37°C. Relative to colostrum replacer, growth of <em>E. coli</em> was lower in RW and FR colostrum from 4 to 24 h and lower in HT colostrum at 6 and 8 h. These results demonstrate inherent microbial growth-inhibiting activity in RW colostrum and suggest that FR better preserved this activity than HT. Our study contributes to understanding the effect of thermal processing on antimicrobial properties of colostrum with the goal of helping to inform colostrum-management strategies for dairy producers. Specifically, our data emphasizes the need to practice hygiene during all steps of the colostrum harvest and storage process, including after completion of HT, because this renders colostrum more susceptible to bacterial growth. Similarly, the cooling and heating steps of stored colostrum should be rapid to minimize growth of <em>E. coli</em>.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94061,"journal":{"name":"JDS communications","volume":"6 4","pages":"Pages 552-556"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JDS communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666910225000468","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Providing newborn calves with sufficient high-quality colostrum is a critical calf-management strategy to support health, survival, and future productivity. Unfortunately, colostrum may also serve as a fomite for disease when contaminated with bacteria at harvest, during storage, or during reheating before feeding. Thermal processing, including heat treatment (HT; 60°C for 60 min) and freezing (FR; −20°C), are common strategies to manage bacterial contamination. Although both strategies maintain IgG concentrations, they destroy colostral immune cells, and HT is known to decrease the concentration and activity of certain bioactive factors such as complement and IgA. We hypothesized that HT and FR would influence the inherent antibacterial properties of bovine colostrum compared with unprocessed, refrigerated colostrum (RW). Our objective was thus to compare growth of Escherichia coli in RW, HT, and FR bovine colostrum. Sterile colostrum samples were collected from Holstein cows (n = 11) on a commercial dairy in New York State and divided into 4 aliquots. One aliquot was submitted for bacterial culture to exclude samples with any bacterial growth (n = 4). The remaining 7 samples were used for the experiment. Aliquots were either RW (4°C for 20 h; n = 7), HT (60°C for 60 min, then 4°C for 19 h; n = 7), or FR (−20°C for 20 h; n = 7). Immediately before inoculation of samples for a bacterial kinetics assay, a dried bovine colostrum-based replacer (CR; Ultra Start 150, Sav-A-Calf, Chilton, WI) was prepared from a single bag according to package instructions as a nutrient-rich control (n = 7). The prepared CR aliquots underwent bacterial culture to ascertain the absence of bacterial growth before inoculation. To simulate contamination that may occur on-farm, all samples were inoculated with 104 cfu/mL E. coli (WM1; 060913 P0lA, isolated from bovine feces) and tested in a bacterial kinetics assay at 37°C. At 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 h, growth of E. coli was quantified on MacConkey agar plates inoculated at 37°C. Relative to colostrum replacer, growth of E. coli was lower in RW and FR colostrum from 4 to 24 h and lower in HT colostrum at 6 and 8 h. These results demonstrate inherent microbial growth-inhibiting activity in RW colostrum and suggest that FR better preserved this activity than HT. Our study contributes to understanding the effect of thermal processing on antimicrobial properties of colostrum with the goal of helping to inform colostrum-management strategies for dairy producers. Specifically, our data emphasizes the need to practice hygiene during all steps of the colostrum harvest and storage process, including after completion of HT, because this renders colostrum more susceptible to bacterial growth. Similarly, the cooling and heating steps of stored colostrum should be rapid to minimize growth of E. coli.
评估接种粪便大肠杆菌的生的、冷冻的和热处理的初乳中的细菌生长情况
为新生牛犊提供足够的高质量初乳是一项重要的小牛管理策略,以支持其健康、生存和未来的生产力。不幸的是,当初乳在收获、储存或喂养前加热过程中被细菌污染时,也可能成为疾病的病原体。热处理,包括热处理(HT;60°C 60分钟)和冷冻(FR;−20°C),是控制细菌污染的常用策略。虽然这两种策略都维持IgG浓度,但它们破坏了初乳免疫细胞,并且已知HT会降低某些生物活性因子(如补体和IgA)的浓度和活性。我们假设HT和FR会影响牛初乳与未加工的冷藏初乳(RW)的固有抗菌性能。因此,我们的目的是比较大肠杆菌在RW、HT和FR牛初乳中的生长情况。从纽约州一家商业奶牛场的荷斯坦奶牛(n = 11)中采集无菌初乳样品,分成4份。其中一份样品进行细菌培养,以排除任何细菌生长的样品(n = 4)。剩余7份样品用于实验。等分分别为RW(4°C) 20 h;n = 7),高温(60°C 60 min,然后4°C 19 h;n = 7),或FR(- 20°C, 20 h;N = 7)。在接种样品进行细菌动力学试验之前,立即使用基于干牛初乳的替代品(CR;Ultra Start 150, Sav-A-Calf, Chilton, WI)根据包装说明从一个袋子中制备,作为营养丰富的对照(n = 7)。制备的CR等分液在接种前进行细菌培养以确定没有细菌生长。为了模拟农场可能发生的污染,所有样品接种104 cfu/mL大肠杆菌(WM1;060913 P0lA,从牛粪便中分离),并在37°C的细菌动力学试验中进行测试。在0、2、4、6、8和24 h,在37℃接种的MacConkey琼脂板上定量大肠杆菌的生长。与替代初乳相比,RW和FR初乳在4 ~ 24 h期间的大肠杆菌生长较低,HT初乳在6和8 h时的生长较低。这些结果表明,RW初乳具有内在的微生物生长抑制活性,FR比HT更能保持这种活性。我们的研究有助于了解热加工对初乳抗菌特性的影响,目的是帮助乳品生产商提供初乳管理策略。具体来说,我们的数据强调在初乳收获和储存过程的所有步骤中,包括完成高温处理后,都需要实践卫生,因为这使得初乳更容易受到细菌生长的影响。同样,储存初乳的冷却和加热步骤应迅速,以尽量减少大肠杆菌的生长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JDS communications
JDS communications Animal Science and Zoology
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信