Exploring co-production through engagement between scientists and producers in an agricultural living lab: A case study in Canada

IF 5.1 1区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Patrick James, Brooke McWherter, Alana R. Westwood
{"title":"Exploring co-production through engagement between scientists and producers in an agricultural living lab: A case study in Canada","authors":"Patrick James,&nbsp;Brooke McWherter,&nbsp;Alana R. Westwood","doi":"10.1016/j.jrurstud.2025.103777","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Agricultural living labs are initiatives where agricultural researchers work with commercial producers to test innovations and management practices under real world scenarios. In Canada, living labs across aim to use a co-production model across the research design and implementation cycle. This model is meant to combine the knowledge and experiences of producers, researchers, and key industry stakeholders. While a key component of co-production is engagement between producers and scientists, this process has not been widely studied in living labs. We developed a concept map for researcher-producer engagement based on identified success factors for living labs and used this to interview participants in Living Lab New Brunswick (11 agricultural producers and 3 scientists). Our results highlight the trade-offs of high trust in producer engagement in living labs and the influence of programmatic design features in informing engagement. Ultimately, our results showcase the challenges of building early engagement in co-production processes and how structural processes such as project scale and institutional incentives can complicate collaborative research. Living labs represent a collaborative research approach that aims to co-develop, test, and evaluate relevant practices to producers. Our results showcase the design and institutional opportunities and challenges in building engagement for co-production, providing considerations for other practitioners building engagement in co-production processes with rural agricultural communities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17002,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Studies","volume":"119 ","pages":"Article 103777"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0743016725002189","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Agricultural living labs are initiatives where agricultural researchers work with commercial producers to test innovations and management practices under real world scenarios. In Canada, living labs across aim to use a co-production model across the research design and implementation cycle. This model is meant to combine the knowledge and experiences of producers, researchers, and key industry stakeholders. While a key component of co-production is engagement between producers and scientists, this process has not been widely studied in living labs. We developed a concept map for researcher-producer engagement based on identified success factors for living labs and used this to interview participants in Living Lab New Brunswick (11 agricultural producers and 3 scientists). Our results highlight the trade-offs of high trust in producer engagement in living labs and the influence of programmatic design features in informing engagement. Ultimately, our results showcase the challenges of building early engagement in co-production processes and how structural processes such as project scale and institutional incentives can complicate collaborative research. Living labs represent a collaborative research approach that aims to co-develop, test, and evaluate relevant practices to producers. Our results showcase the design and institutional opportunities and challenges in building engagement for co-production, providing considerations for other practitioners building engagement in co-production processes with rural agricultural communities.

Abstract Image

通过科学家和生产者在农业生活实验室的参与探索合作生产:以加拿大为例
农业生活实验室是农业研究人员与商业生产者合作,在现实世界场景下测试创新和管理实践的举措。在加拿大,生活实验室的目标是在整个研究设计和实施周期中使用合作生产模式。该模型旨在结合生产者、研究人员和关键行业利益相关者的知识和经验。虽然合作生产的一个关键组成部分是生产者和科学家之间的参与,但这一过程尚未在活体实验室中得到广泛研究。我们根据已确定的生活实验室成功因素,开发了研究人员-生产者参与的概念图,并利用该概念图采访了新不伦瑞克省生活实验室的参与者(11名农业生产者和3名科学家)。我们的研究结果强调了在生活实验室中对生产者参与的高度信任和程序化设计特征对信息参与的影响之间的权衡。最终,我们的结果展示了在合作生产过程中建立早期参与的挑战,以及项目规模和制度激励等结构性过程如何使合作研究复杂化。生活实验室代表了一种合作研究方法,旨在共同开发、测试和评估与生产者相关的实践。我们的研究结果展示了在建立合作生产参与方面的设计和制度机遇与挑战,为其他实践者在与农村农业社区的合作生产过程中建立参与提供了考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
9.80%
发文量
286
期刊介绍: The Journal of Rural Studies publishes research articles relating to such rural issues as society, demography, housing, employment, transport, services, land-use, recreation, agriculture and conservation. The focus is on those areas encompassing extensive land-use, with small-scale and diffuse settlement patterns and communities linked into the surrounding landscape and milieux. Particular emphasis will be given to aspects of planning policy and management. The journal is international and interdisciplinary in scope and content.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信