Delayed cardiac tamponade resulting from left ventricular free wall perforation caused by a right ventricular septal pacemaker lead: A case report

Q4 Medicine
Ryo Nishinarita MD, PhD , Kenshiro Arao MD, PhD, FJCC , Kei Akiyoshi MD , Uiri Ohki MD , Yae Ota MD , Hisashi Sato MD , Yusuke Tamanaha MD , Takaaki Mase MD , Yuichiro Kitada MD , Yonosuke Wada MD , Homare Okamura MD, PhD
{"title":"Delayed cardiac tamponade resulting from left ventricular free wall perforation caused by a right ventricular septal pacemaker lead: A case report","authors":"Ryo Nishinarita MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Kenshiro Arao MD, PhD, FJCC ,&nbsp;Kei Akiyoshi MD ,&nbsp;Uiri Ohki MD ,&nbsp;Yae Ota MD ,&nbsp;Hisashi Sato MD ,&nbsp;Yusuke Tamanaha MD ,&nbsp;Takaaki Mase MD ,&nbsp;Yuichiro Kitada MD ,&nbsp;Yonosuke Wada MD ,&nbsp;Homare Okamura MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jccase.2025.03.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A 70-year-old man underwent dual-chamber pacemaker implantation for symptomatic tachycardia–bradycardia syndrome. The right ventricular (RV) lead was screwed into the RV high septum with a nondeflectable delivery catheter. Two months after implantation, the RV lead perforated through the left ventricular free wall (LVFW) and was identified via computed tomography. The patient underwent open chest surgery. The RV lead was extracted, and a new lead was reinserted at the RV apex after suturing the perforated wounds. Intraoperatively, the extracted lead perforated LVFW beside the first diagonal branch of the left anterior descending artery through the RV septum and the left intraventricular wall instead of the LV cavity. These findings support that the bloody pericardial effusion due to LV perforation in this case originated from RV venous blood but not LV arterial blood and resulted in cardiac perforation of the oozing type instead of the blowout type. The patient was discharged on day 15 post operation, and the patient's situation has been uneventful for a year.</div></div><div><h3>Learning objective</h3><div>This is a rare case of delayed cardiac tamponade from left ventricular (LV) free wall perforation by a right ventricular (RV) septal lead involving both the RV septum and left intraventricular wall. Appropriate lead management and anatomical understanding are necessary to avoid such complications. If LV free wall perforation and cardiac tamponade are noted, an open surgical procedure for lead removal should be considered as the preferred therapeutic option.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":52092,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiology Cases","volume":"32 1","pages":"Pages 1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiology Cases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878540925000210","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A 70-year-old man underwent dual-chamber pacemaker implantation for symptomatic tachycardia–bradycardia syndrome. The right ventricular (RV) lead was screwed into the RV high septum with a nondeflectable delivery catheter. Two months after implantation, the RV lead perforated through the left ventricular free wall (LVFW) and was identified via computed tomography. The patient underwent open chest surgery. The RV lead was extracted, and a new lead was reinserted at the RV apex after suturing the perforated wounds. Intraoperatively, the extracted lead perforated LVFW beside the first diagonal branch of the left anterior descending artery through the RV septum and the left intraventricular wall instead of the LV cavity. These findings support that the bloody pericardial effusion due to LV perforation in this case originated from RV venous blood but not LV arterial blood and resulted in cardiac perforation of the oozing type instead of the blowout type. The patient was discharged on day 15 post operation, and the patient's situation has been uneventful for a year.

Learning objective

This is a rare case of delayed cardiac tamponade from left ventricular (LV) free wall perforation by a right ventricular (RV) septal lead involving both the RV septum and left intraventricular wall. Appropriate lead management and anatomical understanding are necessary to avoid such complications. If LV free wall perforation and cardiac tamponade are noted, an open surgical procedure for lead removal should be considered as the preferred therapeutic option.
右室间隔起搏器导联引起左心室游离壁穿孔导致的迟发性心包填塞1例
一名70岁男性因症状性心动过速-心动过缓综合征接受双腔起搏器植入。将右心室(RV)导联用一根不可偏转的输送导管旋入右心室高间隔。植入两个月后,左心室导联穿过左心室游离壁(LVFW),并通过计算机断层扫描发现。病人接受了开胸手术。取出右心室导联,缝合穿孔创口后在右心室尖部重新插入新的导联。术中取出的导联穿过左室间隔和左室壁,在左前降支第一斜支旁的左室外壁穿孔,而不是左室腔。这些结果支持本例左室穿孔引起的心包积血起源于左室静脉血,而不是左室动脉血,并导致渗出型而不是爆裂型心脏穿孔。患者术后15天出院,一年来病情平平。学习目的:这是一例罕见的由左室(LV)游离壁穿孔引起的迟发性心包填塞,右室(RV)间隔导联累及左室间隔和左室内壁。适当的铅管理和解剖学的理解是必要的,以避免此类并发症。如果注意到左室游离壁穿孔和心包填塞,应考虑开放手术去除铅作为首选治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cardiology Cases
Journal of Cardiology Cases Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
177
审稿时长
59 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信