{"title":"Longitudinal seismic response of non-circular shield tunnels passing through soft-hard stratum","authors":"Lei Liu , Chengshun Xu , Xiuli Du , Daniel Dias","doi":"10.1016/j.soildyn.2025.109640","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>With the continuous development of shield tunneling technology, more and more shield tunnels with non-circular cross-section are appearing in the urban transportation system. The seismic performance of these non-circular cross-section shield tunnels should be paid high attention to, especially when they pass through soft-hard stratum commonly seen in engineering. This study conducted a series of numerical calculation cases to analyze the longitudinal seismic response differences between two typical non-circular cross-section shield tunnels, a horseshoe shaped one and a quasi-rectangular one, and a traditional circular cross-section shield tunnel based on a developed 3D full dynamic numerical model. The model described the interaction between segmental ring and straight bolt by using a type of connector element, greatly reducing element quantities and decreasing computational costs. The results show that the soft-hard stratum exhibit non-negligible local site effects under seismic loading; cross-section type of the shield tunnels has a great impact on segmental ring internal force distribution and ring joint opening width; the dynamic responses of the shield tunnel with horseshoe shaped cross-section are always greater than those of the other two shield tunnels; the maximum bolt response always occurs at the crown and invert of ring joints under longitudinal seismic excitation, therefore, these two critical positions should be prioritized for seismic reinforcement.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49502,"journal":{"name":"Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering","volume":"198 ","pages":"Article 109640"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0267726125004336","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
With the continuous development of shield tunneling technology, more and more shield tunnels with non-circular cross-section are appearing in the urban transportation system. The seismic performance of these non-circular cross-section shield tunnels should be paid high attention to, especially when they pass through soft-hard stratum commonly seen in engineering. This study conducted a series of numerical calculation cases to analyze the longitudinal seismic response differences between two typical non-circular cross-section shield tunnels, a horseshoe shaped one and a quasi-rectangular one, and a traditional circular cross-section shield tunnel based on a developed 3D full dynamic numerical model. The model described the interaction between segmental ring and straight bolt by using a type of connector element, greatly reducing element quantities and decreasing computational costs. The results show that the soft-hard stratum exhibit non-negligible local site effects under seismic loading; cross-section type of the shield tunnels has a great impact on segmental ring internal force distribution and ring joint opening width; the dynamic responses of the shield tunnel with horseshoe shaped cross-section are always greater than those of the other two shield tunnels; the maximum bolt response always occurs at the crown and invert of ring joints under longitudinal seismic excitation, therefore, these two critical positions should be prioritized for seismic reinforcement.
期刊介绍:
The journal aims to encourage and enhance the role of mechanics and other disciplines as they relate to earthquake engineering by providing opportunities for the publication of the work of applied mathematicians, engineers and other applied scientists involved in solving problems closely related to the field of earthquake engineering and geotechnical earthquake engineering.
Emphasis is placed on new concepts and techniques, but case histories will also be published if they enhance the presentation and understanding of new technical concepts.