Testate amoebae as paleoenvironmental indicators in peatlands: calibration-dataset synthesis and assessment of modern analogues using the Neotoma Paleoecology Database

IF 3.2 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL
Robert K. Booth, Alexis Stansfield, Erica Cowper, Jared M. Kodero
{"title":"Testate amoebae as paleoenvironmental indicators in peatlands: calibration-dataset synthesis and assessment of modern analogues using the Neotoma Paleoecology Database","authors":"Robert K. Booth,&nbsp;Alexis Stansfield,&nbsp;Erica Cowper,&nbsp;Jared M. Kodero","doi":"10.1016/j.quascirev.2025.109491","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Testate amoebae are widely used paleoindicators of past environmental conditions, particularly in peatlands where they have been used as surface-moisture proxies. Modern ecological studies of the past several decades inform the interpretation of stratigraphic records, and increasingly both modern surface-sample datasets and stratigraphic records are being added to publicly available databases like the Neotoma Paleoecology Database. In this paper, we broadly synthesize results of calibration studies during the past ∼35 years, and then use data from the Neotoma Paleoecology Database to examine morphospecies-environment relationships in calibration datasets from the northern hemisphere and directly compare subfossil and modern testate amoeba communities to assess the strength of modern analogues for subfossil samples in North American stratigraphic records. Results confirm the consistent and central importance of surface-moisture in controlling testate amoeba communities in peatlands, with similar community-moisture relationships across the Northern Hemisphere. However, many subfossil communities have few good modern analogues, likely due to a combination of factors including differential decomposition of taxa extending beyond the well-documented poor preservation of weakly idiosomic tests. Many subfossil samples contain high abundances and unusual combinations of taxa that are not well represented in modern datasets, and the causes and implications of subfossil communities with poor modern analogues deserve greater attention by the research community. The Neotoma Paleoecology Database is a valuable shared resource, and its continued development will enable the examination of research questions focused on understanding the variability and structure of modern and subfossil testate amoeba communities, as well as moisture reconstructions in both time and space.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20926,"journal":{"name":"Quaternary Science Reviews","volume":"366 ","pages":"Article 109491"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quaternary Science Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277379125003117","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Testate amoebae are widely used paleoindicators of past environmental conditions, particularly in peatlands where they have been used as surface-moisture proxies. Modern ecological studies of the past several decades inform the interpretation of stratigraphic records, and increasingly both modern surface-sample datasets and stratigraphic records are being added to publicly available databases like the Neotoma Paleoecology Database. In this paper, we broadly synthesize results of calibration studies during the past ∼35 years, and then use data from the Neotoma Paleoecology Database to examine morphospecies-environment relationships in calibration datasets from the northern hemisphere and directly compare subfossil and modern testate amoeba communities to assess the strength of modern analogues for subfossil samples in North American stratigraphic records. Results confirm the consistent and central importance of surface-moisture in controlling testate amoeba communities in peatlands, with similar community-moisture relationships across the Northern Hemisphere. However, many subfossil communities have few good modern analogues, likely due to a combination of factors including differential decomposition of taxa extending beyond the well-documented poor preservation of weakly idiosomic tests. Many subfossil samples contain high abundances and unusual combinations of taxa that are not well represented in modern datasets, and the causes and implications of subfossil communities with poor modern analogues deserve greater attention by the research community. The Neotoma Paleoecology Database is a valuable shared resource, and its continued development will enable the examination of research questions focused on understanding the variability and structure of modern and subfossil testate amoeba communities, as well as moisture reconstructions in both time and space.
作为泥炭地古环境指标的遗存变形虫:基于Neotoma古生态数据库的校准-数据集综合和现代类似物评估
遗存变形虫被广泛用于过去环境条件的古指示物,特别是在泥炭地,它们被用作地表湿度的代用物。过去几十年的现代生态学研究为地层记录的解释提供了信息,而且越来越多的现代地表样本数据集和地层记录都被添加到公开可用的数据库中,如Neotoma古生态学数据库。在本文中,我们综合了过去~ 35年的校准研究结果,然后使用来自Neotoma古生态数据库的数据来检查北半球校准数据集中的形态-物种-环境关系,并直接比较亚化石和现代遗存阿米巴群落,以评估北美地层记录中亚化石样品中现代类似物的强度。结果证实了地表湿度在控制泥炭地的无性系阿米巴群落中的一致性和核心重要性,整个北半球的群落湿度关系相似。然而,许多亚化石群落几乎没有好的现代类似物,这可能是由于多种因素的结合,包括分类群的差异分解,而这些分类群的差异分解超出了对弱独特体测试的良好保存。许多亚化石样品含有高丰度和不寻常的分类群组合,这些分类群在现代数据集中没有很好地代表,亚化石群落与现代类似物较差的原因和含义值得研究界更多的关注。Neotoma古生态数据库是一个宝贵的共享资源,它的持续发展将使研究问题集中在理解现代和亚化石的变异性和结构,以及时间和空间上的水分重建。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Quaternary Science Reviews
Quaternary Science Reviews 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
15.00%
发文量
388
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Quaternary Science Reviews caters for all aspects of Quaternary science, and includes, for example, geology, geomorphology, geography, archaeology, soil science, palaeobotany, palaeontology, palaeoclimatology and the full range of applicable dating methods. The dividing line between what constitutes the review paper and one which contains new original data is not easy to establish, so QSR also publishes papers with new data especially if these perform a review function. All the Quaternary sciences are changing rapidly and subject to re-evaluation as the pace of discovery quickens; thus the diverse but comprehensive role of Quaternary Science Reviews keeps readers abreast of the wider issues relating to new developments in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信