Bibliotherapy for adverse childhood experience: A systematic review

IF 1.7 Q2 Medicine
Luana Lenzi , Jack Adlard , Grace Rosina Pangrazi , Saima Bashir , Elaine Bousfield , Alexander Thompson
{"title":"Bibliotherapy for adverse childhood experience: A systematic review","authors":"Luana Lenzi ,&nbsp;Jack Adlard ,&nbsp;Grace Rosina Pangrazi ,&nbsp;Saima Bashir ,&nbsp;Elaine Bousfield ,&nbsp;Alexander Thompson","doi":"10.1016/j.aimed.2025.100492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This systematic review aims to identify, describe, and evaluate the available evidence regarding the effectiveness of bibliotherapy in supporting individuals to overcome adverse childhood experiences (ACE).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic search was performed using Medline, Embase, APA PsycInfo and PubMed. Studies were included if they involved participants of any age who had experienced any form of ACE during childhood and had received bibliotherapy as a form of treatment or support. Risk of bias was assesses using RoB 2 and ROBINS-I as appropriate and results were narratively synthesised (PROSPERO CRD42023404418).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Out of the 606 studies identified, only five met the inclusion criteria, comprising four RCTs and one non-RCT. The interventions included superhero and affective bibliotherapy, a community-based initiative designed to foster a love for reading among children while creating a safe and engaging environment, explicit bibliotherapy, a support group integrating indigenous stories with cognitive behavioural therapy components, and poetry therapy. These interventions were compared against alternative interventions or waitlist controls. Although the evidence was limited and of moderate to low quality, the findings suggest that bibliotherapy may help reduce ACE-related outcomes such as anxiety, grief, and PTSD, enhances emotional competence, provides a higher sense of support compared to waitlist. The included studies were not directly comparable due to high heterogeneity in study design, intervention methods ad outcomes assessment.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This systematic review highlights the need for further research into the use of bibliotherapy for managing ACE. Cautious implementation of bibliotherapy as an adjunct treatment to complement traditional therapy may enhance and prolong positive outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7343,"journal":{"name":"Advances in integrative medicine","volume":"12 4","pages":"Article 100492"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in integrative medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212958825000515","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This systematic review aims to identify, describe, and evaluate the available evidence regarding the effectiveness of bibliotherapy in supporting individuals to overcome adverse childhood experiences (ACE).

Methods

A systematic search was performed using Medline, Embase, APA PsycInfo and PubMed. Studies were included if they involved participants of any age who had experienced any form of ACE during childhood and had received bibliotherapy as a form of treatment or support. Risk of bias was assesses using RoB 2 and ROBINS-I as appropriate and results were narratively synthesised (PROSPERO CRD42023404418).

Results

Out of the 606 studies identified, only five met the inclusion criteria, comprising four RCTs and one non-RCT. The interventions included superhero and affective bibliotherapy, a community-based initiative designed to foster a love for reading among children while creating a safe and engaging environment, explicit bibliotherapy, a support group integrating indigenous stories with cognitive behavioural therapy components, and poetry therapy. These interventions were compared against alternative interventions or waitlist controls. Although the evidence was limited and of moderate to low quality, the findings suggest that bibliotherapy may help reduce ACE-related outcomes such as anxiety, grief, and PTSD, enhances emotional competence, provides a higher sense of support compared to waitlist. The included studies were not directly comparable due to high heterogeneity in study design, intervention methods ad outcomes assessment.

Conclusions

This systematic review highlights the need for further research into the use of bibliotherapy for managing ACE. Cautious implementation of bibliotherapy as an adjunct treatment to complement traditional therapy may enhance and prolong positive outcomes.
不良童年经历的阅读疗法:系统回顾
目的:本系统综述旨在识别、描述和评估关于阅读疗法在支持个体克服不良童年经历(ACE)方面有效性的现有证据。方法采用Medline、Embase、APA PsycInfo、PubMed等软件进行系统检索。研究包括任何年龄的参与者,他们在童年时期经历过任何形式的ACE,并接受过阅读疗法作为一种治疗或支持。适当时使用rob2和ROBINS-I评估偏倚风险,并对结果进行叙述性综合(PROSPERO CRD42023404418)。结果在606项研究中,只有5项符合纳入标准,包括4项随机对照试验和1项非随机对照试验。干预措施包括超级英雄和情感阅读疗法,一个以社区为基础的倡议,旨在培养孩子们对阅读的热爱,同时创造一个安全和吸引人的环境,明确的阅读疗法,一个将土著故事与认知行为疗法相结合的支持小组,以及诗歌疗法。将这些干预措施与其他干预措施或候补名单对照进行比较。尽管证据有限,质量中等到低,但研究结果表明,阅读疗法可能有助于减少与ace相关的结果,如焦虑、悲伤和创伤后应激障碍,增强情绪能力,与等候名单相比,提供更高的支持感。由于研究设计、干预方法和结果评估的高度异质性,纳入的研究没有直接可比性。结论本系统综述强调了进一步研究阅读疗法治疗ACE的必要性。谨慎实施阅读疗法作为补充传统疗法的辅助治疗可以增强和延长积极的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in integrative medicine
Advances in integrative medicine INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
11.80%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Integrative Medicine (AIMED) is an international peer-reviewed, evidence-based research and review journal that is multi-disciplinary within the fields of Integrative and Complementary Medicine. The journal focuses on rigorous quantitative and qualitative research including systematic reviews, clinical trials and surveys, whilst also welcoming medical hypotheses and clinically-relevant articles and case studies disclosing practical learning tools for the consulting practitioner. By promoting research and practice excellence in the field, and cross collaboration between relevant practitioner groups and associations, the journal aims to advance the practice of IM, identify areas for future research, and improve patient health outcomes. International networking is encouraged through clinical innovation, the establishment of best practice and by providing opportunities for cooperation between organisations and communities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信