Understanding of exact equality emerges after and builds on symbolic number knowledge1

IF 2.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Chi-Chuan Chen , Daniel C. Hyde
{"title":"Understanding of exact equality emerges after and builds on symbolic number knowledge1","authors":"Chi-Chuan Chen ,&nbsp;Daniel C. Hyde","doi":"10.1016/j.cognition.2025.106226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Establishing whether two sets of objects have the same number of objects turns out to be surprisingly challenging for children even if they have some basic number word and counting knowledge. Here we study the relationship between understanding of exact equality of sets and symbolic number knowledge in preschool children (<em>N</em> = 208, Age = 2.89–5.09 years) at various stages of symbolic number word acquisition. We gave children two classic verbal symbolic number word knowledge tasks (Give-N, How Many?) and two comparable but non-verbal set-matching tasks in which they were asked to produce a set of objects that numerically matched a target set. We find strong evidence that symbolic number knowledge is related to but precedes set-matching for exact equality, both replicating and extending recent findings. Specifically, set-matching accuracy was better for children who understood symbolic number cardinality compared to those who did not, even after accounting for age and executive functions. Furthermore, this effect was seen across the range of set sizes tested (1–8), including smaller set sizes (1–4) typically thought to be within the cognitive limits to be compared for exact equality non-verbally. Finally, set-matching performance was below ceiling even at set sizes corresponding to individual children's specific level of symbolic number knowledge (N) as well as the preceding quantity (N-1). Together these results suggest that understanding of exact equality builds on symbolic number knowledge. More broadly, our results support the emerging view that understanding symbolic number cardinality is only one early step towards understanding the symbolic number system.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48455,"journal":{"name":"Cognition","volume":"264 ","pages":"Article 106226"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010027725001660","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Establishing whether two sets of objects have the same number of objects turns out to be surprisingly challenging for children even if they have some basic number word and counting knowledge. Here we study the relationship between understanding of exact equality of sets and symbolic number knowledge in preschool children (N = 208, Age = 2.89–5.09 years) at various stages of symbolic number word acquisition. We gave children two classic verbal symbolic number word knowledge tasks (Give-N, How Many?) and two comparable but non-verbal set-matching tasks in which they were asked to produce a set of objects that numerically matched a target set. We find strong evidence that symbolic number knowledge is related to but precedes set-matching for exact equality, both replicating and extending recent findings. Specifically, set-matching accuracy was better for children who understood symbolic number cardinality compared to those who did not, even after accounting for age and executive functions. Furthermore, this effect was seen across the range of set sizes tested (1–8), including smaller set sizes (1–4) typically thought to be within the cognitive limits to be compared for exact equality non-verbally. Finally, set-matching performance was below ceiling even at set sizes corresponding to individual children's specific level of symbolic number knowledge (N) as well as the preceding quantity (N-1). Together these results suggest that understanding of exact equality builds on symbolic number knowledge. More broadly, our results support the emerging view that understanding symbolic number cardinality is only one early step towards understanding the symbolic number system.
对精确相等的理解是在符号数知识之后产生并建立在符号数知识的基础上的
即使孩子们有一些基本的数字单词和计数知识,确定两组物体是否有相同数量的物体对他们来说也是一个惊人的挑战。本研究研究了学龄前儿童(N = 208,年龄= 2.89-5.09岁)在符号数单词习得的不同阶段对集合精确等式的理解与符号数知识的关系。我们给孩子们两个经典的口头符号数字单词知识任务(给出n,有多少?)和两个可比较但非口头的集合匹配任务,他们被要求产生一组在数字上与目标集合匹配的对象。我们发现了强有力的证据,证明符号数知识与精确相等的集合匹配相关,但先于集合匹配,既复制又扩展了最近的发现。具体来说,即使在考虑了年龄和执行功能之后,理解符号数字基数的儿童比不理解符号数字基数的儿童的集合匹配准确性更好。此外,这种效应在测试的集合大小范围(1-8)中都可以看到,包括较小的集合大小(1-4),通常被认为是在认知限制范围内,以非语言方式进行精确的平等比较。最后,即使在与个体儿童特定的符号数知识水平(N)和前面的数量(N-1)相对应的集合大小上,集合匹配表现也低于上限。这些结果表明,对精确等式的理解建立在符号数知识的基础上。更广泛地说,我们的结果支持了新兴的观点,即理解符号数基数只是理解符号数系统的一个早期步骤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cognition
Cognition PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
283
期刊介绍: Cognition is an international journal that publishes theoretical and experimental papers on the study of the mind. It covers a wide variety of subjects concerning all the different aspects of cognition, ranging from biological and experimental studies to formal analysis. Contributions from the fields of psychology, neuroscience, linguistics, computer science, mathematics, ethology and philosophy are welcome in this journal provided that they have some bearing on the functioning of the mind. In addition, the journal serves as a forum for discussion of social and political aspects of cognitive science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信