A Longitudinal Assessment of Anterior Cingulate Cortex Gamma-aminobutyric Acid in Antipsychotic Medication-naïve First Episode Psychosis Patients

IF 5.3 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Genelle D Samson, Jose O Maximo, Eric A Nelson, Nina V Kraguljac, William P Armstrong, Branden Benningfield, Seyedeh Nasim Adnani, Adil Bashir, Adrienne C Lahti
{"title":"A Longitudinal Assessment of Anterior Cingulate Cortex Gamma-aminobutyric Acid in Antipsychotic Medication-naïve First Episode Psychosis Patients","authors":"Genelle D Samson, Jose O Maximo, Eric A Nelson, Nina V Kraguljac, William P Armstrong, Branden Benningfield, Seyedeh Nasim Adnani, Adil Bashir, Adrienne C Lahti","doi":"10.1093/schbul/sbaf079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Hypothesis Converging evidence from animal and human studies has implicated gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-ergic dysfunction in the pathophysiology of psychosis spectrum disorders. However, little is known about GABA’s role in the early illness stages. Based on prior research, we hypothesized that GABA levels would already be altered in first episode psychosis patients (FEP), and that they would be associated with patients’ cognitive function and response to treatment. Study Design We used magnetic resonance spectroscopy with a MEGA-PRESS sequence to quantify GABA in the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) at baseline and over the course of antipsychotic treatment with risperidone. We compared GABA levels between 79 medication-naïve FEP and 113 healthy controls (HC) longitudinally over a period of 16 weeks and examined their relationships to cognition and treatment response. Study Results We found significantly lower GABA levels in FEP compared to HC at all 3 time points (baseline, 6 weeks, 16 weeks), but did not observe a significant main effect of time or an interaction of group by time. We found no significant correlations between GABA and cognitive scores. Baseline GABA levels of patients considered treatment nonresponders significantly differed from HC, whereas responders did not. Conclusions Our findings suggest that GABA dysfunction in the ACC may be an important feature of the core pathophysiology of psychosis. This dysfunction does not appear to be attenuated by conventional antipsychotic treatment, though baseline levels may be indicative of clinical prognosis in FEP.","PeriodicalId":21530,"journal":{"name":"Schizophrenia Bulletin","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Schizophrenia Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbaf079","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Hypothesis Converging evidence from animal and human studies has implicated gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-ergic dysfunction in the pathophysiology of psychosis spectrum disorders. However, little is known about GABA’s role in the early illness stages. Based on prior research, we hypothesized that GABA levels would already be altered in first episode psychosis patients (FEP), and that they would be associated with patients’ cognitive function and response to treatment. Study Design We used magnetic resonance spectroscopy with a MEGA-PRESS sequence to quantify GABA in the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) at baseline and over the course of antipsychotic treatment with risperidone. We compared GABA levels between 79 medication-naïve FEP and 113 healthy controls (HC) longitudinally over a period of 16 weeks and examined their relationships to cognition and treatment response. Study Results We found significantly lower GABA levels in FEP compared to HC at all 3 time points (baseline, 6 weeks, 16 weeks), but did not observe a significant main effect of time or an interaction of group by time. We found no significant correlations between GABA and cognitive scores. Baseline GABA levels of patients considered treatment nonresponders significantly differed from HC, whereas responders did not. Conclusions Our findings suggest that GABA dysfunction in the ACC may be an important feature of the core pathophysiology of psychosis. This dysfunction does not appear to be attenuated by conventional antipsychotic treatment, though baseline levels may be indicative of clinical prognosis in FEP.
抗精神病药物Medication-naïve首发精神病患者前扣带皮层γ -氨基丁酸的纵向评估
来自动物和人类研究的越来越多的证据表明,γ -氨基丁酸(GABA)-能量功能障碍在精神病谱系障碍的病理生理中起着重要作用。然而,人们对GABA在疾病早期的作用知之甚少。基于先前的研究,我们假设GABA水平在首发精神病患者(FEP)中已经改变,并且它们与患者的认知功能和对治疗的反应有关。研究设计我们使用磁共振波谱和MEGA-PRESS序列来量化基线和利培酮抗精神病治疗过程中背前扣带皮层(ACC)中的GABA。我们比较了79名medication-naïve FEP和113名健康对照(HC)在16周内的GABA水平,并检查了它们与认知和治疗反应的关系。研究结果:我们发现在所有3个时间点(基线、6周、16周),FEP患者的GABA水平明显低于HC,但没有观察到时间的显著主要影响或各组间的相互作用。我们发现GABA和认知评分之间没有显著的相关性。治疗无反应的患者的基线GABA水平与HC有显著差异,而有反应的患者则无显著差异。结论:前扣带GABA功能障碍可能是精神病核心病理生理的一个重要特征。尽管基线水平可能指示FEP的临床预后,但这种功能障碍似乎并没有通过常规抗精神病药物治疗而减轻。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Schizophrenia Bulletin
Schizophrenia Bulletin 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
6.10%
发文量
163
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Schizophrenia Bulletin seeks to review recent developments and empirically based hypotheses regarding the etiology and treatment of schizophrenia. We view the field as broad and deep, and will publish new knowledge ranging from the molecular basis to social and cultural factors. We will give new emphasis to translational reports which simultaneously highlight basic neurobiological mechanisms and clinical manifestations. Some of the Bulletin content is invited as special features or manuscripts organized as a theme by special guest editors. Most pages of the Bulletin are devoted to unsolicited manuscripts of high quality that report original data or where we can provide a special venue for a major study or workshop report. Supplement issues are sometimes provided for manuscripts reporting from a recent conference.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信