Correction to “Not a border crisis, but a labor market crisis: The often overlooked “pull” factor of U.S. border crossings”

IF 2.4 3区 管理学 Q2 ECONOMICS
{"title":"Correction to “Not a border crisis, but a labor market crisis: The often overlooked “pull” factor of U.S. border crossings”","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/pam.70015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Bahar, D. (2025). Not a border crisis, but a labor market crisis: The often overlooked “pull” factor of U.S. border crossings. <i>Journal of Policy Analysis and Management</i>, 44, 674–680. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.22665</p><p>Due to a coding error in the statistical software, some variables measuring year-over-year differences were incorrectly computed. After correcting the code and re-estimating all results—both in the main manuscript and the supplementary materials—the overall findings and conclusions of the study remain unchanged. The figures and tables affected by the correction are reproduced below. The author apologizes for this error and any confusion it may have caused.</p><p><b>Corrections to the Manuscript</b></p><p><b><i>Correction to Figure 1(c)</i></b>: <i>The corrected version of the figure reflecting the updated year-over-year calculations, is reproduced below</i>.</p><p>Figure 1(c): Southwest Border Encounters and Labor Market Tightness, y-o-y</p><p></p><p><b><i>Correction of values in text, page 677</i></b>:</p><p><i>The following text contained incorrect elasticity values</i>:</p><p>When using year-over-year differences, estimating an Auto Regressive Distributed Lag model, the elasticity is about <i>0.35</i>. This elasticity is smaller in magnitudes, but it is based on changes and not on levels. As such, it implies that a 10 percent increase in labor market tightness levels from a year ago is associated with an increase in border crossings of <i>3.5</i> percent relative to a year before.</p><p><i>It should be replaced with</i>:</p><p>When using year-over-year differences, estimating an Auto Regressive Distributed Lag model, the elasticity is about <i>0.46</i>. This elasticity is smaller in magnitudes, but it is based on changes and not on levels. As such, it implies that a 10 percent increase in labor market tightness levels from a year ago is associated with an increase in border crossings of <i>4.6</i> percent relative to a year before.</p><p><b><i>Correction to Figure 3(b)</i></b>: <i>The corrected version of the figure reflecting the updated year-over-year calculations, is reproduced below</i>.</p><p>Figure 3(b): Estimated Elasticity per Presidential Term, y-o-y</p><p></p><p><b><i>Correction to Table B1</i></b>: <i>The second column has been updated to reflect corrected year-over-year elasticity estimates following the resolution of a coding error. The full corrected table is reproduced below</i>.</p><p>Table B1: Elasticity of crossings to labor market tightness\n\n </p><p><b><i>Correction of values in text, page OA-3</i></b>:</p><p><b><i>Correction to Table B2</i></b>: <i>Columns 3 and 4 have been updated to reflect corrected year-over-year elasticity estimates following the resolution of a coding error. The full corrected table is reproduced below</i>.</p><p>Table B2: Elasticity of crossings to labor market tightness, by presidential term.\n\n </p><p><b><i>Correction to Figure C1(b)</i></b>:</p><p><i>The corrected version of the figure reflecting the updated year-over-year calculations, is reproduced below</i>.</p><p>Figure C1(b): Southwest border encounters and labor market tightness (2018-2024), y-o-y</p><p></p><p><b><i>Correction to Table E1</i></b>: <i>All columns in Panel B have been updated to reflect corrected year-over-year elasticity estimates following the resolution of a coding error. The full corrected table is reproduced below</i>.</p><p>Table E1: Elasticity of crossings to labor market tightness, by crossing point.</p><p> \n </p><p>In addition to the year-over-year results, several quarterly data estimates were affected by the same coding error and have been revised. The corrected tables and figures are reproduced below.</p><p><b><i>Correction to Figure F1(c)</i></b>: <i>The corrected version of the figure reflecting the year-over-year calculations, is reproduced below</i>.</p><p>Figure F1(c): Southwest Border Encounters and Labor Market Tightness, quarterly data, y-o-y</p><p></p><p><b><i>Correction to Table F1</i></b>: <i>Column 2 has been updated to reflect corrected year-over-year elasticity estimates following the resolution of a coding error. The full corrected table is reproduced below</i>.</p><p>Table F1: Elasticity of crossings to labor market tightness (quarterly data).\n\n </p><p><b><i>Correction to Table F2</i></b>: <i>Columns 3 and 4 have been updated to reflect corrected year-over-year elasticity estimates following the resolution of a coding error. The full corrected table is reproduced below</i>.</p><p>Table F2: Elasticity of crossings to labor market tightness, by Presidential Term (quarterly data).\n\n </p><p>The author regrets this minor coding error and appreciates the opportunity to correct the record. As noted, despite the changes outlined above, the overall findings and conclusions of the study remain unchanged.</p>","PeriodicalId":48105,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Policy Analysis and Management","volume":"44 4","pages":"1509-1514"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/pam.70015","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Policy Analysis and Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pam.70015","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bahar, D. (2025). Not a border crisis, but a labor market crisis: The often overlooked “pull” factor of U.S. border crossings. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 44, 674–680. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.22665

Due to a coding error in the statistical software, some variables measuring year-over-year differences were incorrectly computed. After correcting the code and re-estimating all results—both in the main manuscript and the supplementary materials—the overall findings and conclusions of the study remain unchanged. The figures and tables affected by the correction are reproduced below. The author apologizes for this error and any confusion it may have caused.

Corrections to the Manuscript

Correction to Figure 1(c): The corrected version of the figure reflecting the updated year-over-year calculations, is reproduced below.

Figure 1(c): Southwest Border Encounters and Labor Market Tightness, y-o-y

Correction of values in text, page 677:

The following text contained incorrect elasticity values:

When using year-over-year differences, estimating an Auto Regressive Distributed Lag model, the elasticity is about 0.35. This elasticity is smaller in magnitudes, but it is based on changes and not on levels. As such, it implies that a 10 percent increase in labor market tightness levels from a year ago is associated with an increase in border crossings of 3.5 percent relative to a year before.

It should be replaced with:

When using year-over-year differences, estimating an Auto Regressive Distributed Lag model, the elasticity is about 0.46. This elasticity is smaller in magnitudes, but it is based on changes and not on levels. As such, it implies that a 10 percent increase in labor market tightness levels from a year ago is associated with an increase in border crossings of 4.6 percent relative to a year before.

Correction to Figure 3(b): The corrected version of the figure reflecting the updated year-over-year calculations, is reproduced below.

Figure 3(b): Estimated Elasticity per Presidential Term, y-o-y

Correction to Table B1: The second column has been updated to reflect corrected year-over-year elasticity estimates following the resolution of a coding error. The full corrected table is reproduced below.

Table B1: Elasticity of crossings to labor market tightness

Correction of values in text, page OA-3:

Correction to Table B2: Columns 3 and 4 have been updated to reflect corrected year-over-year elasticity estimates following the resolution of a coding error. The full corrected table is reproduced below.

Table B2: Elasticity of crossings to labor market tightness, by presidential term.

Correction to Figure C1(b):

The corrected version of the figure reflecting the updated year-over-year calculations, is reproduced below.

Figure C1(b): Southwest border encounters and labor market tightness (2018-2024), y-o-y

Correction to Table E1: All columns in Panel B have been updated to reflect corrected year-over-year elasticity estimates following the resolution of a coding error. The full corrected table is reproduced below.

Table E1: Elasticity of crossings to labor market tightness, by crossing point.

In addition to the year-over-year results, several quarterly data estimates were affected by the same coding error and have been revised. The corrected tables and figures are reproduced below.

Correction to Figure F1(c): The corrected version of the figure reflecting the year-over-year calculations, is reproduced below.

Figure F1(c): Southwest Border Encounters and Labor Market Tightness, quarterly data, y-o-y

Correction to Table F1: Column 2 has been updated to reflect corrected year-over-year elasticity estimates following the resolution of a coding error. The full corrected table is reproduced below.

Table F1: Elasticity of crossings to labor market tightness (quarterly data).

Correction to Table F2: Columns 3 and 4 have been updated to reflect corrected year-over-year elasticity estimates following the resolution of a coding error. The full corrected table is reproduced below.

Table F2: Elasticity of crossings to labor market tightness, by Presidential Term (quarterly data).

The author regrets this minor coding error and appreciates the opportunity to correct the record. As noted, despite the changes outlined above, the overall findings and conclusions of the study remain unchanged.

Abstract Image

更正“不是边境危机,而是劳动力市场危机:经常被忽视的美国边境过境的“拉动”因素”
巴哈尔,D.(2025)。不是边境危机,而是劳动力市场危机:这是经常被忽视的美国边境过境的“拉动”因素。政策分析与管理,44,674-680。https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.22665Due由于统计软件中的编码错误,一些衡量年度差异的变量被错误地计算出来。在修改了代码并重新估计了所有结果(包括主要手稿和补充材料)之后,研究的总体发现和结论保持不变。受更正影响的数字和表格转载如下。作者对这个错误及其可能造成的任何混乱表示歉意。对手稿的更正图1(c)的更正:该数字的更正反映了更新的逐年计算,现转载如下。图1(c):西南边境碰撞和劳动力市场紧缩,y-o-y文本值的更正,第677页:以下文本包含不正确的弹性值:当使用年比差异,估计一个自动回归分布滞后模型,弹性约为0.35。这种弹性在量级上较小,但它是基于变化而不是水平。因此,这意味着劳动力市场紧缩水平比一年前增加10%,与过境人数比一年前增加3.5%有关。当使用年际差异,估计Auto Regressive Distributed Lag模型时,弹性约为0.46。这种弹性在量级上较小,但它是基于变化而不是水平。因此,这意味着劳动力市场紧缩水平比一年前增加10%,与边境过境人数比一年前增加4.6%有关。对图3(b)的更正:以下转载了反映逐年更新计算结果的订正数字。图3(b):每个总统任期的估计弹性,y-o-y表B1的更正:第二列已更新,以反映在解决编码错误后更正的年度弹性估计。完整的订正表转载如下。对OA-3页文本值的修正:对表B2的修正:第3列和第4列已更新,以反映在解决编码错误后修正的同比弹性估计。完整的订正表转载如下。表B2:按总统任期划分的劳动力市场紧张程度的弹性。对图C1(b)的更正:订正的数字反映了最新的逐年计算,转载如下。图C1(b):西南边境遭遇和劳动力市场紧张(2018-2024),y-o-y表E1的更正:面板b中的所有列都已更新,以反映编码错误解决后修正的同比弹性估计。完整的订正表转载如下。表E1:按交叉点划分的对劳动力市场紧缩的交叉弹性。除了同比结果外,几个季度的数据估计也受到相同编码错误的影响,并已进行了修订。更正后的表格和数字转载如下。对图F1(c)的更正:反映逐年计算的数字的订正如下。图F1(c):西南边境遭遇和劳动力市场紧缩,季度数据,y-o-y表F1的修正:第2列已更新,以反映在解决编码错误后修正的年度同比弹性估计。完整的订正表转载如下。表F1:劳动力市场紧缩的交叉弹性(季度数据)。对表F2的更正:第3列和第4列已更新,以反映在解决编码错误后更正的年度同比弹性估计值。完整的订正表转载如下。表F2:按总统任期划分的劳动力市场紧缩的交叉弹性(季度数据)。作者对这个小的编码错误表示遗憾,并感谢有机会纠正记录。如上所述,尽管有上述变化,但研究的总体结果和结论仍未改变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: This journal encompasses issues and practices in policy analysis and public management. Listed among the contributors are economists, public managers, and operations researchers. Featured regularly are book reviews and a department devoted to discussing ideas and issues of importance to practitioners, researchers, and academics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信