Novel enzyme-based reduced representation method for DNA methylation profiling with low inputs

IF 16.6 2区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Qianli Liu, Kathryn A Helmin, Zachary D Dortzbach, Carla P Reyes Flores, Manuel A Torres Acosta, Jonathan K Gurkan, Anthony M Joudi, Nurbek Mambetsariev, Luisa Morales-Nebreda, Mengjia Kang, Luke Rasmussen, Xóchitl G Pérez-Leonor, Hiam Abdala-Valencia, Benjamin D Singer
{"title":"Novel enzyme-based reduced representation method for DNA methylation profiling with low inputs","authors":"Qianli Liu, Kathryn A Helmin, Zachary D Dortzbach, Carla P Reyes Flores, Manuel A Torres Acosta, Jonathan K Gurkan, Anthony M Joudi, Nurbek Mambetsariev, Luisa Morales-Nebreda, Mengjia Kang, Luke Rasmussen, Xóchitl G Pérez-Leonor, Hiam Abdala-Valencia, Benjamin D Singer","doi":"10.1093/nar/gkaf558","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Commonly used bisulfite-based procedures for DNA methylation sequencing can degrade DNA, worsening signal-to-noise ratios in samples with low DNA input. Enzymatic methylation sequencing (EM-seq) has been proposed as a less biased alternative for methylation profiling with greater genome coverage. Reduced representation approaches enrich samples for CpG-rich genomic regions, thereby enhancing throughput and cost effectiveness. We hypothesized that enzyme-based technology could be adapted for reduced representation methylation sequencing to enable DNA methylation profiling of low-input samples. We leveraged the well-established differences in methylation profile between mouse CD4+ T cell populations to compare the performance of our reduced representation EM-seq (RREM-seq) procedure against an established reduced representation bisulfite sequencing (RRBS) protocol. While the RRBS method failed to generate reliable DNA libraries when using <2 ng of DNA, the RREM-seq method successfully generated reliable DNA libraries from 1–25 ng of mouse and human DNA. Low-input (≤2-ng) RREM-seq libraries demonstrated superior regulatory genomic element coverage compared with RRBS libraries with >10-fold higher DNA input. RREM-seq also successfully detected lineage-defining methylation differences between alveolar conventional T and regulatory T cells obtained from patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia. Our RREM-seq method enables single-nucleotide resolution methylation profiling using low-input samples, including from clinical sources.","PeriodicalId":19471,"journal":{"name":"Nucleic Acids Research","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":16.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nucleic Acids Research","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkaf558","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Commonly used bisulfite-based procedures for DNA methylation sequencing can degrade DNA, worsening signal-to-noise ratios in samples with low DNA input. Enzymatic methylation sequencing (EM-seq) has been proposed as a less biased alternative for methylation profiling with greater genome coverage. Reduced representation approaches enrich samples for CpG-rich genomic regions, thereby enhancing throughput and cost effectiveness. We hypothesized that enzyme-based technology could be adapted for reduced representation methylation sequencing to enable DNA methylation profiling of low-input samples. We leveraged the well-established differences in methylation profile between mouse CD4+ T cell populations to compare the performance of our reduced representation EM-seq (RREM-seq) procedure against an established reduced representation bisulfite sequencing (RRBS) protocol. While the RRBS method failed to generate reliable DNA libraries when using <2 ng of DNA, the RREM-seq method successfully generated reliable DNA libraries from 1–25 ng of mouse and human DNA. Low-input (≤2-ng) RREM-seq libraries demonstrated superior regulatory genomic element coverage compared with RRBS libraries with >10-fold higher DNA input. RREM-seq also successfully detected lineage-defining methylation differences between alveolar conventional T and regulatory T cells obtained from patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia. Our RREM-seq method enables single-nucleotide resolution methylation profiling using low-input samples, including from clinical sources.
基于酶的低输入DNA甲基化谱简化表示新方法
通常使用的基于亚硫酸氢盐的DNA甲基化测序程序可以降解DNA,在低DNA输入的样品中恶化信噪比。酶甲基化测序(EM-seq)被认为是一种偏差较小的替代甲基化分析方法,具有更大的基因组覆盖率。减少表征方法丰富了富含cpg的基因组区域的样本,从而提高了吞吐量和成本效益。我们假设基于酶的技术可以适用于减少代表性甲基化测序,以实现低输入样本的DNA甲基化分析。我们利用小鼠CD4+ T细胞群之间甲基化谱的既定差异来比较我们的减少表征EM-seq (RREM-seq)程序与建立的减少表征亚硫酸氢盐测序(RRBS)方案的性能。RRBS方法在使用&;lt;2 ng的DNA时无法生成可靠的DNA文库,而RREM-seq方法则成功地从1-25 ng的小鼠和人类DNA中生成可靠的DNA文库。与DNA输入高10倍的RRBS文库相比,低输入(≤2-ng)的RREM-seq文库显示出更好的调控基因组元件覆盖率。RREM-seq还成功检测了重症SARS-CoV-2肺炎患者肺泡常规T细胞和调节性T细胞之间具有谱系定义的甲基化差异。我们的rem -seq方法能够使用低输入样本(包括临床来源)进行单核苷酸分辨率甲基化分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nucleic Acids Research
Nucleic Acids Research 生物-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
27.10
自引率
4.70%
发文量
1057
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Nucleic Acids Research (NAR) is a scientific journal that publishes research on various aspects of nucleic acids and proteins involved in nucleic acid metabolism and interactions. It covers areas such as chemistry and synthetic biology, computational biology, gene regulation, chromatin and epigenetics, genome integrity, repair and replication, genomics, molecular biology, nucleic acid enzymes, RNA, and structural biology. The journal also includes a Survey and Summary section for brief reviews. Additionally, each year, the first issue is dedicated to biological databases, and an issue in July focuses on web-based software resources for the biological community. Nucleic Acids Research is indexed by several services including Abstracts on Hygiene and Communicable Diseases, Animal Breeding Abstracts, Agricultural Engineering Abstracts, Agbiotech News and Information, BIOSIS Previews, CAB Abstracts, and EMBASE.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信