Demewoz Haile, Kassandra L. Harding, Susan A. McLaughlin, Charlie Ashbaugh, Vanessa Garcia, Nora M. Gilbertson, Hewan Kifle, Marie C. Parent, Reed J. D. Sorensen, Simon I. Hay, Aleksandr Y. Aravkin, Peng Zheng, Jeffrey D. Stanaway, Christopher J. L. Murray, Michael Brauer
{"title":"Health effects associated with consumption of processed meat, sugar-sweetened beverages and trans fatty acids: a Burden of Proof study","authors":"Demewoz Haile, Kassandra L. Harding, Susan A. McLaughlin, Charlie Ashbaugh, Vanessa Garcia, Nora M. Gilbertson, Hewan Kifle, Marie C. Parent, Reed J. D. Sorensen, Simon I. Hay, Aleksandr Y. Aravkin, Peng Zheng, Jeffrey D. Stanaway, Christopher J. L. Murray, Michael Brauer","doi":"10.1038/s41591-025-03775-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Previous research suggests detrimental health effects associated with consuming processed foods, including processed meats, sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) and trans fatty acids (TFAs). However, systematic characterization of the dose–response relationships between these foods and health outcomes is limited. Here, using Burden of Proof meta-regression methods, we evaluated the associations between processed meat, SSBs and TFAs and three chronic diseases: type 2 diabetes, ischemic heart disease (IHD) and colorectal cancer. We conservatively estimated that—relative to zero consumption—consuming processed meat (at 0.6–57 g d<sup>−1</sup>) was associated with at least an 11% average increase in type 2 diabetes risk and a 7% (at 0.78–55 g d<sup>−1</sup>) increase in colorectal cancer risk. SSB intake (at 1.5–390 g d<sup>−1</sup>) was associated with at least an 8% average increase in type 2 diabetes risk and a 2% (at 0–365 g d<sup>−1</sup>) increase in IHD risk. TFA consumption (at 0.25–2.56% of daily energy intake) was associated with at least a 3% average increase in IHD risk. These associations each received two-star ratings reflecting weak relationships or inconsistent input evidence, highlighting both the need for further research and—given the high burden of these chronic diseases—the merit of continuing to recommend limiting consumption of these foods.</p>","PeriodicalId":19037,"journal":{"name":"Nature Medicine","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":58.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-025-03775-8","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Previous research suggests detrimental health effects associated with consuming processed foods, including processed meats, sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) and trans fatty acids (TFAs). However, systematic characterization of the dose–response relationships between these foods and health outcomes is limited. Here, using Burden of Proof meta-regression methods, we evaluated the associations between processed meat, SSBs and TFAs and three chronic diseases: type 2 diabetes, ischemic heart disease (IHD) and colorectal cancer. We conservatively estimated that—relative to zero consumption—consuming processed meat (at 0.6–57 g d−1) was associated with at least an 11% average increase in type 2 diabetes risk and a 7% (at 0.78–55 g d−1) increase in colorectal cancer risk. SSB intake (at 1.5–390 g d−1) was associated with at least an 8% average increase in type 2 diabetes risk and a 2% (at 0–365 g d−1) increase in IHD risk. TFA consumption (at 0.25–2.56% of daily energy intake) was associated with at least a 3% average increase in IHD risk. These associations each received two-star ratings reflecting weak relationships or inconsistent input evidence, highlighting both the need for further research and—given the high burden of these chronic diseases—the merit of continuing to recommend limiting consumption of these foods.
先前的研究表明,食用加工食品(包括加工肉类、含糖饮料和反式脂肪酸)会对健康产生有害影响。然而,这些食物与健康结果之间的剂量-反应关系的系统表征是有限的。本研究采用举证责任元回归方法,评估了加工肉类、SSBs和tfa与三种慢性疾病(2型糖尿病、缺血性心脏病(IHD)和结直肠癌)之间的关系。我们保守估计,相对于零消费,食用加工肉类(0.6-57 g d - 1)与2型糖尿病风险平均增加至少11%和结直肠癌风险平均增加7% (0.78-55 g d - 1)相关。SSB摄入量(1.5-390 g d - 1)与2型糖尿病风险平均增加至少8%和IHD风险平均增加2% (0-365 g d - 1)相关。TFA摄入量(每日能量摄入的0.25-2.56%)与IHD风险平均增加至少3%相关。这些关联都获得了两颗星的评级,这反映了两者之间的微弱关系或不一致的输入证据,强调了进一步研究的必要性,以及考虑到这些慢性疾病的高负担,继续建议限制食用这些食物的优点。
期刊介绍:
Nature Medicine is a monthly journal publishing original peer-reviewed research in all areas of medicine. The publication focuses on originality, timeliness, interdisciplinary interest, and the impact on improving human health. In addition to research articles, Nature Medicine also publishes commissioned content such as News, Reviews, and Perspectives. This content aims to provide context for the latest advances in translational and clinical research, reaching a wide audience of M.D. and Ph.D. readers. All editorial decisions for the journal are made by a team of full-time professional editors.
Nature Medicine consider all types of clinical research, including:
-Case-reports and small case series
-Clinical trials, whether phase 1, 2, 3 or 4
-Observational studies
-Meta-analyses
-Biomarker studies
-Public and global health studies
Nature Medicine is also committed to facilitating communication between translational and clinical researchers. As such, we consider “hybrid” studies with preclinical and translational findings reported alongside data from clinical studies.