Large, double‐stranded DNA viruses tend to suppress phytoplankton populations more effectively than small viruses of diverse genome type

IF 5.1 2区 地球科学 Q1 LIMNOLOGY
Kyle F. Edwards, Kelsey A. McBeain, Christopher R. Schvarcz, Grieg F. Steward
{"title":"Large, double‐stranded DNA viruses tend to suppress phytoplankton populations more effectively than small viruses of diverse genome type","authors":"Kyle F. Edwards, Kelsey A. McBeain, Christopher R. Schvarcz, Grieg F. Steward","doi":"10.1002/lol2.70035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Viruses infecting aquatic microbes vary immensely in size, but the ecological consequences of virus size are poorly understood. Here we used a unique suite of diverse phytoplankton strains and their viruses, all isolated from waters around Hawai'i, to assess whether virus size affects the suppression of host populations. We found that small viruses of diverse genome type (3–24 kb genome size, 23–70 nm capsid diameter) have very similar effects on host populations, suppressing hosts less strongly and for a shorter period of time compared to large double‐stranded DNA viruses (214–1380 kb, 112–386 nm). Suppressive effects of larger viruses were more heterogeneous, but most isolates reduced host populations by many orders of magnitude, without recovery over the ~ 25‐d experiments. Our results suggest that disparate lineages of viruses may have ecological consequences that are predictable in part based on size, and that ecosystem impacts of viral infection may vary with the size structure of the viral community.","PeriodicalId":18128,"journal":{"name":"Limnology and Oceanography Letters","volume":"656 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Limnology and Oceanography Letters","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/lol2.70035","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LIMNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Viruses infecting aquatic microbes vary immensely in size, but the ecological consequences of virus size are poorly understood. Here we used a unique suite of diverse phytoplankton strains and their viruses, all isolated from waters around Hawai'i, to assess whether virus size affects the suppression of host populations. We found that small viruses of diverse genome type (3–24 kb genome size, 23–70 nm capsid diameter) have very similar effects on host populations, suppressing hosts less strongly and for a shorter period of time compared to large double‐stranded DNA viruses (214–1380 kb, 112–386 nm). Suppressive effects of larger viruses were more heterogeneous, but most isolates reduced host populations by many orders of magnitude, without recovery over the ~ 25‐d experiments. Our results suggest that disparate lineages of viruses may have ecological consequences that are predictable in part based on size, and that ecosystem impacts of viral infection may vary with the size structure of the viral community.
大的双链DNA病毒往往比不同基因组类型的小病毒更有效地抑制浮游植物种群
感染水生微生物的病毒在大小上差别很大,但人们对病毒大小的生态后果知之甚少。在这里,我们使用了一套独特的不同的浮游植物菌株和它们的病毒,都是从夏威夷周围的水域分离出来的,来评估病毒的大小是否会影响宿主种群的抑制。我们发现,不同基因组类型的小病毒(基因组大小3-24 kb,衣壳直径23-70 nm)对宿主种群的影响非常相似,与大双链DNA病毒(214-1380 kb, 112-386 nm)相比,对宿主的抑制较弱,持续时间较短。较大的病毒的抑制作用更具有异质性,但大多数分离株减少了许多数量级的宿主种群,在25天的实验中没有恢复。我们的研究结果表明,不同的病毒谱系可能会产生生态后果,这在一定程度上是基于大小来预测的,病毒感染对生态系统的影响可能会随着病毒群落的大小结构而变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
3.80%
发文量
63
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊介绍: Limnology and Oceanography Letters (LO-Letters) serves as a platform for communicating the latest innovative and trend-setting research in the aquatic sciences. Manuscripts submitted to LO-Letters are expected to present high-impact, cutting-edge results, discoveries, or conceptual developments across all areas of limnology and oceanography, including their integration. Selection criteria for manuscripts include their broad relevance to the field, strong empirical and conceptual foundations, succinct and elegant conclusions, and potential to advance knowledge in aquatic sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信