Poonam R. Kulkarni , Nicolette E. Andrzejczyk , Arun Gavaskar , Abigail Cartwright , David T. Adamson , John Cook , Charles J. Newell
{"title":"Characteristics of aqueous film forming foam (AFFF) sites impacted with per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS): A 37-site study","authors":"Poonam R. Kulkarni , Nicolette E. Andrzejczyk , Arun Gavaskar , Abigail Cartwright , David T. Adamson , John Cook , Charles J. Newell","doi":"10.1016/j.watres.2025.124124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A meta-analysis of 37 military aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF) sites was conducted to gain insights into the fate and transport of seven key perfluoroalkyl acids (PFAAs): PFOS, PFOA, PFHxS, PFHxA, PFBS, PFBA, and PFNA. Specifically, this study aims to examine occurrence of the seven PFAAs in soil and groundwater at AFFF source zones and understand PFAA plume characteristics as well as estimate plume lengths. Based on an evaluation of these PFAAs in soil samples collected in the source zone, the highest concentrations predominantly occur within the top one meter (m) below ground surface (bgs). PFOS and PFOA are the major PFAA contributors in soil at source zones, whereas groundwater exhibits a more diverse concentration distribution. Inferred Current Plume Lengths are presented for the seven PFAAs, with median plume lengths ranging from 220 to 800 m. Finally, an exceedance magnitude assessment was conducted to evaluate the potential contribution of each studied PFAA to the exceedance of groundwater regional screening levels (RSLs) or maximum contaminant levels (MCLs). Results indicate that at typical AFFF sites, PFOS, PFOA, and PFHxS generally contribute 99 % of the estimated exceedance magnitude, whereas short-chained PFAAs (PFHxA, PFBS, and PFBA) contribute <1 %.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":443,"journal":{"name":"Water Research","volume":"285 ","pages":"Article 124124"},"PeriodicalIF":12.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0043135425010310","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
A meta-analysis of 37 military aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF) sites was conducted to gain insights into the fate and transport of seven key perfluoroalkyl acids (PFAAs): PFOS, PFOA, PFHxS, PFHxA, PFBS, PFBA, and PFNA. Specifically, this study aims to examine occurrence of the seven PFAAs in soil and groundwater at AFFF source zones and understand PFAA plume characteristics as well as estimate plume lengths. Based on an evaluation of these PFAAs in soil samples collected in the source zone, the highest concentrations predominantly occur within the top one meter (m) below ground surface (bgs). PFOS and PFOA are the major PFAA contributors in soil at source zones, whereas groundwater exhibits a more diverse concentration distribution. Inferred Current Plume Lengths are presented for the seven PFAAs, with median plume lengths ranging from 220 to 800 m. Finally, an exceedance magnitude assessment was conducted to evaluate the potential contribution of each studied PFAA to the exceedance of groundwater regional screening levels (RSLs) or maximum contaminant levels (MCLs). Results indicate that at typical AFFF sites, PFOS, PFOA, and PFHxS generally contribute 99 % of the estimated exceedance magnitude, whereas short-chained PFAAs (PFHxA, PFBS, and PFBA) contribute <1 %.
期刊介绍:
Water Research, along with its open access companion journal Water Research X, serves as a platform for publishing original research papers covering various aspects of the science and technology related to the anthropogenic water cycle, water quality, and its management worldwide. The audience targeted by the journal comprises biologists, chemical engineers, chemists, civil engineers, environmental engineers, limnologists, and microbiologists. The scope of the journal include:
•Treatment processes for water and wastewaters (municipal, agricultural, industrial, and on-site treatment), including resource recovery and residuals management;
•Urban hydrology including sewer systems, stormwater management, and green infrastructure;
•Drinking water treatment and distribution;
•Potable and non-potable water reuse;
•Sanitation, public health, and risk assessment;
•Anaerobic digestion, solid and hazardous waste management, including source characterization and the effects and control of leachates and gaseous emissions;
•Contaminants (chemical, microbial, anthropogenic particles such as nanoparticles or microplastics) and related water quality sensing, monitoring, fate, and assessment;
•Anthropogenic impacts on inland, tidal, coastal and urban waters, focusing on surface and ground waters, and point and non-point sources of pollution;
•Environmental restoration, linked to surface water, groundwater and groundwater remediation;
•Analysis of the interfaces between sediments and water, and between water and atmosphere, focusing specifically on anthropogenic impacts;
•Mathematical modelling, systems analysis, machine learning, and beneficial use of big data related to the anthropogenic water cycle;
•Socio-economic, policy, and regulations studies.