The Job Embeddedness Scale: A Test of Its Reliability and Validity in Chinese Perioperative Settings

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q2 MANAGEMENT
Tso-kuang Wu, Hung-da Dai, Shu Yu
{"title":"The Job Embeddedness Scale: A Test of Its Reliability and Validity in Chinese Perioperative Settings","authors":"Tso-kuang Wu,&nbsp;Hung-da Dai,&nbsp;Shu Yu","doi":"10.1155/jonm/9311215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><b>Aims:</b> This study aimed to translate, validate, and implement the Job Embeddedness Scale (JES) in perioperative settings in Taiwan.</p>\n <p><b>Background:</b> Job embeddedness is an important determinant of predicting job turnover; however, no tool exists to measure among perioperative nurses in Taiwan.</p>\n <p><b>Methods:</b> A cross-sectional research design was employed using self-administered questionnaires in this study. The JES was forward-translated through group discussions and back-translated by two bilingual translators. Six experts evaluated content validity. A total of 344 perioperative registered nurses from three medical centers were invited to assess the construct validity of the Chinese version of the Job Embeddedness Scale (C-JES), and a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted. Reliability analyses were also performed.</p>\n <p><b>Results:</b> Based on CFA, our results supported a six-factor version of 31-item C-JES with goodness-of-fit indices that model fit was acceptable. The C-JES presented a high content validity with a CVI of 0.98. Additionally, the 31-item C-JES was highly correlated to the original 40-item JES (Pearson’s <i>r</i> = 0.98). Cronbach’s <i>α</i> for the C-JES was 0.91, and test–retest reliability over a 2-week interval showed an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.82.</p>\n <p><b>Conclusion:</b> The C-JES is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing job embeddedness among perioperative nurses in Taiwan. This study presents a concise, theoretically grounded 31-item measure that preserves the original scale’s full content coverage, demonstrates a strong correlation with the 40-item version (<i>r</i> = 0.98), and maintains high internal consistency (<i>α</i> = 0.91). Its results can be applied to human resource management and policymaking and then to increase nurses’ retention rates. Additionally, this scale can help in understanding different cross-cultural job embeddedness as well as explaining its relationship with nurse retention globally.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":49297,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing Management","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/jonm/9311215","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/jonm/9311215","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: This study aimed to translate, validate, and implement the Job Embeddedness Scale (JES) in perioperative settings in Taiwan.

Background: Job embeddedness is an important determinant of predicting job turnover; however, no tool exists to measure among perioperative nurses in Taiwan.

Methods: A cross-sectional research design was employed using self-administered questionnaires in this study. The JES was forward-translated through group discussions and back-translated by two bilingual translators. Six experts evaluated content validity. A total of 344 perioperative registered nurses from three medical centers were invited to assess the construct validity of the Chinese version of the Job Embeddedness Scale (C-JES), and a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted. Reliability analyses were also performed.

Results: Based on CFA, our results supported a six-factor version of 31-item C-JES with goodness-of-fit indices that model fit was acceptable. The C-JES presented a high content validity with a CVI of 0.98. Additionally, the 31-item C-JES was highly correlated to the original 40-item JES (Pearson’s r = 0.98). Cronbach’s α for the C-JES was 0.91, and test–retest reliability over a 2-week interval showed an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.82.

Conclusion: The C-JES is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing job embeddedness among perioperative nurses in Taiwan. This study presents a concise, theoretically grounded 31-item measure that preserves the original scale’s full content coverage, demonstrates a strong correlation with the 40-item version (r = 0.98), and maintains high internal consistency (α = 0.91). Its results can be applied to human resource management and policymaking and then to increase nurses’ retention rates. Additionally, this scale can help in understanding different cross-cultural job embeddedness as well as explaining its relationship with nurse retention globally.

Abstract Image

工作嵌入度量表在围手术期的信效度检验
摘要目的:本研究旨在探讨工作嵌入性量表(JES)在台湾围手术期的翻译、验证与应用。背景:工作嵌入性是预测员工离职的重要决定因素;然而,台湾地区围手术期护士并无测量工具。方法:本研究采用自填问卷,采用横断面研究设计。JES通过小组讨论进行前译,并由两名双语翻译人员进行后译。6位专家评估了内容效度。邀请3个医疗中心的344名围手术期注册护士对中文版工作嵌入度量表(C-JES)进行构效度评估,并进行验证性因子分析(CFA)。进行了可靠性分析。结果:基于CFA,我们的结果支持六因素版本的31项C-JES的拟合优度指数,模型拟合可接受。C-JES具有较高的内容效度,CVI为0.98。此外,31项C-JES与原来的40项JES高度相关(Pearson’s r = 0.98)。C-JES的Cronbach’s α为0.91,2周的重测信度显示类内相关系数(ICC)为0.82。结论:C-JES是评估围手术期护士工作嵌入性的有效、可靠的工具。本研究提出了一个简洁的、基于理论的31项测量,保留了原始量表的全部内容覆盖,与40项版本具有很强的相关性(r = 0.98),并保持了高内部一致性(α = 0.91)。其结果可以应用于人力资源管理和政策制定,从而提高护士的保留率。此外,该量表可以帮助理解不同的跨文化工作嵌入性,并解释其与全球护士保留的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
14.50%
发文量
377
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nursing Management is an international forum which informs and advances the discipline of nursing management and leadership. The Journal encourages scholarly debate and critical analysis resulting in a rich source of evidence which underpins and illuminates the practice of management, innovation and leadership in nursing and health care. It publishes current issues and developments in practice in the form of research papers, in-depth commentaries and analyses. The complex and rapidly changing nature of global health care is constantly generating new challenges and questions. The Journal of Nursing Management welcomes papers from researchers, academics, practitioners, managers, and policy makers from a range of countries and backgrounds which examine these issues and contribute to the body of knowledge in international nursing management and leadership worldwide. The Journal of Nursing Management aims to: -Inform practitioners and researchers in nursing management and leadership -Explore and debate current issues in nursing management and leadership -Assess the evidence for current practice -Develop best practice in nursing management and leadership -Examine the impact of policy developments -Address issues in governance, quality and safety
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信