Suitability of Strip-Tillage and Undersowing in Maize Crops to Control Runoff, Soil Erosion and Herbicide Loss: Field Trials and Modelling

IF 2.9 3区 地球科学 Q1 Environmental Science
Timothée Clement, Charles L. Bielders, Aurore Degré, Gilles Manssens, Guy Foucart, Olivier Pigeon, Alodie Blondel, Bruno Huyghebaert
{"title":"Suitability of Strip-Tillage and Undersowing in Maize Crops to Control Runoff, Soil Erosion and Herbicide Loss: Field Trials and Modelling","authors":"Timothée Clement,&nbsp;Charles L. Bielders,&nbsp;Aurore Degré,&nbsp;Gilles Manssens,&nbsp;Guy Foucart,&nbsp;Olivier Pigeon,&nbsp;Alodie Blondel,&nbsp;Bruno Huyghebaert","doi":"10.1002/hyp.70170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>In Western Europe, the silt loam belt is highly vulnerable to erosion, especially in spring on fields cultivated with spring crops such as maize. Identifying conservation farming practices that reconcile agricultural production with soil and water protection is therefore critical. To this end, we evaluated the suitability of red fescue or white clover undersowing as well as strip-tillage to control runoff, soil loss, and herbicide surface loss in maize under natural rainfall conditions. Results were compared to a sole-maize control. The treatments were implemented in triplicate across six trial sites, distributed over three cropping seasons from 2021 to 2023. Weed control in the undersowing treatment proved particularly challenging due to herbicide constraints. Furthermore, no mitigation effect was observed on water, sediment, and herbicide surface flows, while maize yields were reduced by 11% on average compared to the control treatment. Although strip-tillage also resulted in an 11% loss in maize yields on average, it significantly decreased runoff (−31%) and soil loss (−60%) compared to the control. Based on the measured runoff and soil losses for the control and strip-tillage treatments, the process-based CREHDYS model was calibrated using a parsimonious approach. It was then used to conduct scenario analyses across a range of soil, rainfall and slope conditions found across the Belgian loess belt. On average across all scenarios, pluvial flood hazard was reduced by about half. Modelling of soil losses in strip-tillage proved insufficiently reliable, highlighting the need for improved characterisation of sediment fluxes in such systems. In spite of the disappointing results of undersowing in terms of yields and reduction in surface flows, future research could focus on other environmental benefits of this technique. For strip-tillage, strategies should be investigated to promote its adoption by farmers as a stepping stone towards no-till systems.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":13189,"journal":{"name":"Hydrological Processes","volume":"39 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hydrological Processes","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hyp.70170","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Western Europe, the silt loam belt is highly vulnerable to erosion, especially in spring on fields cultivated with spring crops such as maize. Identifying conservation farming practices that reconcile agricultural production with soil and water protection is therefore critical. To this end, we evaluated the suitability of red fescue or white clover undersowing as well as strip-tillage to control runoff, soil loss, and herbicide surface loss in maize under natural rainfall conditions. Results were compared to a sole-maize control. The treatments were implemented in triplicate across six trial sites, distributed over three cropping seasons from 2021 to 2023. Weed control in the undersowing treatment proved particularly challenging due to herbicide constraints. Furthermore, no mitigation effect was observed on water, sediment, and herbicide surface flows, while maize yields were reduced by 11% on average compared to the control treatment. Although strip-tillage also resulted in an 11% loss in maize yields on average, it significantly decreased runoff (−31%) and soil loss (−60%) compared to the control. Based on the measured runoff and soil losses for the control and strip-tillage treatments, the process-based CREHDYS model was calibrated using a parsimonious approach. It was then used to conduct scenario analyses across a range of soil, rainfall and slope conditions found across the Belgian loess belt. On average across all scenarios, pluvial flood hazard was reduced by about half. Modelling of soil losses in strip-tillage proved insufficiently reliable, highlighting the need for improved characterisation of sediment fluxes in such systems. In spite of the disappointing results of undersowing in terms of yields and reduction in surface flows, future research could focus on other environmental benefits of this technique. For strip-tillage, strategies should be investigated to promote its adoption by farmers as a stepping stone towards no-till systems.

Abstract Image

玉米带状耕作和地下播种控制径流、土壤侵蚀和除草剂流失的适宜性:田间试验和模拟
在西欧,粉砂壤土带极易受到侵蚀,特别是在种植玉米等春季作物的田地。因此,确定使农业生产与水土保护相协调的保护性耕作方法至关重要。为此,我们评估了在自然降雨条件下,红羊茅或白三叶草下播和带状耕作对控制玉米径流、土壤流失和除草剂表面流失的适宜性。结果与单玉米对照比较。这些处理在六个试验点分三次实施,分布在2021年至2023年的三个种植季节。由于除草剂的限制,深播处理的杂草控制特别具有挑战性。此外,在水、沉积物和除草剂表面流动方面没有观察到缓解效果,而玉米产量与对照处理相比平均减少了11%。尽管带状耕作也导致玉米产量平均损失11%,但与对照相比,它显著减少了径流量(- 31%)和土壤流失量(- 60%)。基于控制和条带耕作处理的径流量和土壤流失量,基于过程的CREHDYS模型使用一种简约的方法进行了校准。然后,它被用于对比利时黄土带的一系列土壤、降雨和斜坡条件进行情景分析。在所有情景中,洪积洪水的危害平均减少了约一半。对带状耕作土壤流失的模拟证明不够可靠,突出表明需要改进这种系统中沉积物通量的特征。尽管就产量和减少地表流量而言,深播的结果令人失望,但未来的研究可以集中在这项技术的其他环境效益上。对于条带耕作,应研究促进农民采用条带耕作作为免耕制度的垫脚石的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hydrological Processes
Hydrological Processes 环境科学-水资源
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
313
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Hydrological Processes is an international journal that publishes original scientific papers advancing understanding of the mechanisms underlying the movement and storage of water in the environment, and the interaction of water with geological, biogeochemical, atmospheric and ecological systems. Not all papers related to water resources are appropriate for submission to this journal; rather we seek papers that clearly articulate the role(s) of hydrological processes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信