The Role of Reproductive Injustice in the Access of Motherhood for Women With Intellectual Disabilities: A Narrative Literature Review

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL
Coralie Mercerat, Laura Pacheco, Marjorie Aunos, Marie-Marthe Cousineau, Ami Goulden, Michelle Swab, Bethany Brenton, Sibusiso Moyo
{"title":"The Role of Reproductive Injustice in the Access of Motherhood for Women With Intellectual Disabilities: A Narrative Literature Review","authors":"Coralie Mercerat,&nbsp;Laura Pacheco,&nbsp;Marjorie Aunos,&nbsp;Marie-Marthe Cousineau,&nbsp;Ami Goulden,&nbsp;Michelle Swab,&nbsp;Bethany Brenton,&nbsp;Sibusiso Moyo","doi":"10.1111/jar.70086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Even though becoming a parent and forming meaningful relationships are considered fundamental rights, research shows that there are significant barriers for people with intellectual disabilities within these social roles, as they are still seen as unfit for parenthood. Given limited research knowledge about the reproductive trajectories of women with intellectual disabilities, this paper presents the results of a narrative literature review on reproductive injustices against women with intellectual disabilities.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted in-depth research within the scientific literature to better understand the reproductive injustice experienced by women with intellectual disabilities.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Thirty-two publications were included in this narrative literature review. The main results are related to the nature and actors involved in the reproductive injustice and six types of discourses underpinning the non-consensual contraception, including sterilisation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The findings have implications for future community-based research and intersectoral policies and practices that promote agency and relational autonomy of women with intellectual disabilities.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51403,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities","volume":"38 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jar.70086","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jar.70086","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Even though becoming a parent and forming meaningful relationships are considered fundamental rights, research shows that there are significant barriers for people with intellectual disabilities within these social roles, as they are still seen as unfit for parenthood. Given limited research knowledge about the reproductive trajectories of women with intellectual disabilities, this paper presents the results of a narrative literature review on reproductive injustices against women with intellectual disabilities.

Methods

We conducted in-depth research within the scientific literature to better understand the reproductive injustice experienced by women with intellectual disabilities.

Results

Thirty-two publications were included in this narrative literature review. The main results are related to the nature and actors involved in the reproductive injustice and six types of discourses underpinning the non-consensual contraception, including sterilisation.

Conclusion

The findings have implications for future community-based research and intersectoral policies and practices that promote agency and relational autonomy of women with intellectual disabilities.

Abstract Image

生殖不公平在智障妇女获得母性中的作用:一项叙事文献综述
尽管为人父母和建立有意义的人际关系被认为是基本权利,但研究表明,在这些社会角色中,智障人士面临着重大障碍,因为他们仍然被视为不适合为人父母。鉴于对智障女性生殖轨迹的研究有限,本文介绍了对智障女性生殖不公正的叙述文献综述的结果。方法通过对相关科学文献的深入研究,更好地了解智障女性生殖不公平现象。结果本研究纳入32篇文献。主要结果与生殖不公正的性质和参与者以及支持包括绝育在内的非自愿避孕的六种话语有关。结论研究结果对未来以社区为基础的研究和促进智障妇女的代理和关系自主的部门间政策和实践具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
79
期刊介绍: JARID is an international, peer-reviewed journal which draws together findings derived from original applied research in intellectual disabilities. The journal is an important forum for the dissemination of ideas to promote valued lifestyles for people with intellectual disabilities. It reports on research from the UK and overseas by authors from all relevant professional disciplines. It is aimed at an international, multi-disciplinary readership. Topics covered include community living, quality of life, challenging behaviour, communication, sexuality, medication, ageing, supported employment, family issues, mental health, physical health, autism, economic issues, social networks, staff stress, staff training, epidemiology and service provision.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信