{"title":"SCLRAD: Semi-supervised contrastive learning using random replacement of adjacent depths for lithology identification","authors":"Fengda Zhao , Haobing Zhai , Zihan Zhou , Pengwei Zhang , Xianshan Li","doi":"10.1016/j.jappgeo.2025.105795","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Lithological identification is significant in logging interpretation work, as it is the foundation for evaluating reservoirs and describing reservoirs and basins. In lithological identification, due to the difficulty in obtaining lithological data and the high cost of labeling, there is often a situation of needing labels. How to fully utilize the lithological data with missing labels is a problem that needs to be solved. Therefore, this paper introduces a semi-supervised contrastive learning model, SCLRAD (Semi-supervised contrastive learning using random replacement of adjacent depths), aiming to fully utilize lithology data, extract better feature representations, and improve the accuracy of lithology recognition. Lithological data exhibits a discernible pattern of variation in depth. Sample pairs for contrastive learning are constructed by harnessing depth information to unearth deeper features within the data. The loss function weights for various proxy tasks are fine-tuned through a semi-supervised joint training framework. The combined effects of contrast loss and classification loss act on the encoder, enabling it to learn the intrinsic characteristics of the lithological data and capture its inherent differences and similarities, thus enhancing the classifier’s performance. Accordingly, the experimental approach presented in this study is grounded in blind wells testing. The lithology identification accuracy on the China Daqing Fields datasets and Hugoton and Panoma Fields datasets reached 82.02% and 68.55%, respectively. By manipulating the ratio of unlabeled data on the Hugoton and Panoma Fields dataset, even when the labeling ratio is below 60%, comparing favorably with the 1D-CNN, the accuracy improves by 2.77% to 4.22%.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54882,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Geophysics","volume":"241 ","pages":"Article 105795"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Geophysics","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0926985125001764","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Lithological identification is significant in logging interpretation work, as it is the foundation for evaluating reservoirs and describing reservoirs and basins. In lithological identification, due to the difficulty in obtaining lithological data and the high cost of labeling, there is often a situation of needing labels. How to fully utilize the lithological data with missing labels is a problem that needs to be solved. Therefore, this paper introduces a semi-supervised contrastive learning model, SCLRAD (Semi-supervised contrastive learning using random replacement of adjacent depths), aiming to fully utilize lithology data, extract better feature representations, and improve the accuracy of lithology recognition. Lithological data exhibits a discernible pattern of variation in depth. Sample pairs for contrastive learning are constructed by harnessing depth information to unearth deeper features within the data. The loss function weights for various proxy tasks are fine-tuned through a semi-supervised joint training framework. The combined effects of contrast loss and classification loss act on the encoder, enabling it to learn the intrinsic characteristics of the lithological data and capture its inherent differences and similarities, thus enhancing the classifier’s performance. Accordingly, the experimental approach presented in this study is grounded in blind wells testing. The lithology identification accuracy on the China Daqing Fields datasets and Hugoton and Panoma Fields datasets reached 82.02% and 68.55%, respectively. By manipulating the ratio of unlabeled data on the Hugoton and Panoma Fields dataset, even when the labeling ratio is below 60%, comparing favorably with the 1D-CNN, the accuracy improves by 2.77% to 4.22%.
岩性识别是评价储层、描述储层和盆地的基础,在测井解释工作中具有重要意义。在岩性识别中,由于岩性资料获取难度大、标注成本高,经常出现需要标注的情况。如何充分利用缺少标签的岩性资料是一个需要解决的问题。为此,本文引入了一种半监督对比学习模型SCLRAD (semi-supervised contrast learning using random replacement of邻深),旨在充分利用岩性数据,提取更好的特征表示,提高岩性识别的准确率。岩性资料显示出可识别的深度变化模式。对比学习的样本对是通过利用深度信息来挖掘数据中更深层次的特征来构建的。通过半监督联合训练框架对各种代理任务的损失函数权值进行微调。对比损失和分类损失的联合作用作用于编码器,使其能够学习岩性数据的内在特征,并捕捉其内在的异同,从而提高分类器的性能。因此,本研究提出的实验方法是基于盲井测试的。在中国大庆油田数据集、Hugoton油田和Panoma油田数据集上的岩性识别精度分别达到82.02%和68.55%。通过操纵Hugoton和Panoma Fields数据集上未标记数据的比例,即使标记比例低于60%,与1D-CNN相比,准确率也提高了2.77%至4.22%。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Applied Geophysics with its key objective of responding to pertinent and timely needs, places particular emphasis on methodological developments and innovative applications of geophysical techniques for addressing environmental, engineering, and hydrological problems. Related topical research in exploration geophysics and in soil and rock physics is also covered by the Journal of Applied Geophysics.